Yes, it's irrelevant. A marriage is a thing unto itself, and the only people it need concern are the two people involved. If one couple feels their marriage is somehow rendered less by another couple being married, then it is the first couple whose relationship I question.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Attention gay folks!
Collapse
X
-
The primary benefits are not monetary, but protection: hospital visitation rights, funerary planning, estate planning, inheritance rights, etc. Even gay couples who individually had these granted via individual legal documents have had those overturned by courts at the behest of other family members.
The monetary rights could be considered benefits rights, such as Social Security, medicare, pensions, as well as health insurance coverage.
I think it has been estimated there are 1,049 benefits of marriage, great and small. However, I don't know about there being any significant monetary advantage, at least in the U.S., as we have the much-discussed "marriage penalty" tax.Tutto nel mondo è burla
Comment
-
think you can handle your grandchildren exchanging vows with farm animals?"I work in IT so I'd be buggered without a computer" - Words of wisdom from Provost Harrison
"You can be wrong AND jewish" - Wiglaf :love:
Comment
-
I don't think many people who make such a reference realize how deeply hurtful it is to a homosexual to compare his relationship to someone he loves and who loves him to raping a child or buggering a farm animal. If someone made the same allusion to a man's relationship with his wife, I can't imagine his outrage.Tutto nel mondo è burla
Comment
-
ok
I'm sorry, that was insensitive. It came of my inability to understand homosexual love, and exaggeration of definition. I just don't know if I'll ever be able to understand, because to tell you the truth - looking at a picture like the one featured in this article, makes me giggle
Comment
Comment