France issues 'please explain' to US

[Whaleboy]

There were no attacks, they found ricin in apartments in North London. Presumably for use in attacks, but there were no attacks using ricin in Britain since that ambassador guy was killed in the 70's (memory like a sieve today.)

[Whaleboy]

If you're talking about corruption, look at the Oregan Open Source Bill. Despite the fact that it would have given better performance at a cheaper cost, Microsoft complained to their friends in the US Admin. and the bill was swiftly dropped. Plenty of examples like that... although I'm most familiar with the linux examples.

[Sandman]

A few months ago, IIRC. I can get you links if you really want them. However, you should know better than I abuot these attacks. What I heard, though, is that the Brits believed the ricin involved in those attacks was made in Iraq.

You'll have trouble finding links for attacks which never happened.

[Ned]

Originally posted by HershOstropoler
I don't think the tax cuts are primatily bribes motivated. The awarding of contracts to Bechtel is either corruption or cronyism. Like all of Bush's business "career".

I had heard that there are only two companies in the world that could do the job, Bechtel and a French company. If this is true, it simply is not corruption to choose Bechtel.

[Whaleboy]

https://www.cantdistinguishfromdreamsandreality.com

Like the attacks, that website doesnt actually exist btw

[HershOstropoler]

Originally posted by Ned


I had heard that there are only two companies in the world that could do the job, Bechtel and a French company.

For Bechtel's consulting and engineering jobs? Please.

[Cruddy]

Originally posted by Ned


A few months ago, IIRC. I can get you links if you really want them. However, you should know better than I abuot these attacks. What I heard, though, is that the Brits believed the ricin involved in those attacks was made in Iraq.

Sorry Ned. No ricin attacks in the UK. What happened was a small kitchen lab was found in the UK making VERY low grade ricin for potential attacks.

If this had continued, well, attacks were possible - maybe a couple years down the line when they had enough and had refined it.

But honestly folks, no ricin attacks in the UK.

The culprits involved are probably going to do a STACK of time for their piddly efforts - which will probably mean the next bunch has more sophisticated methods.

[DinoDoc]

Originally posted by HershOstropoler
"Eh?"

Your SC is a political joke.

Are you refering to something that recently happened because I can point out more than a few amusing decisions that predate the Bush era which seems to be the source of much of your criticism?

[Ned]

Originally posted by HershOstropoler


For Bechtel's consulting and engineering jobs? Please.

OK, name another US company that could put out the oil well fires and perform the other jobs for which Bechtell was hired?

[SlowwHand]

Red Adair.

[Ned]

And do the things that Bechtel was hired to do.

[Spiffor]

Originally posted by Ned
So, in your terms, the French left sees French idealism and messianism as a colossal failure and opposes American idealism and messianism for the same reason.

Yes, but it's not the only point. The left mobilizes many people through slogans about the US as uber-capitalist, uber-imperialistic (reputation which isn't helped by the hyperpower status of the US) and fundamentalist. These slogans are in used pretty much in every left-wing demonstration in the world, I assume. The trauma about the repetition of the 'white man's burden' is especially important to me, but I have heard several friends thinking about it too. But I think it mostly adresses to educated people, and hence isn't massively used by the politicians.

The French right still sees France in the role moving the world toward a better future.

A bit of that, but the French right also often considers France deserves to be a power, in a Gaullist tradition (De Gaulle wanted to restore France as an independant power).
As such, the attempt to become powerful again, through a European bloc led by France and Germany belongs to the Gaullist tradition.
Right-wingers aren't necessarily nationalists, and even are rarely so (nationalism is mostly a feature of the far-right), I mean, there is little hatred / dislike for other countries, even though many jokes or prejudices exist towards our neighbours.

France's messianism is much more subtle than the US one, because it isn't actively promoted by the State. Rather, it comes from the Revolution + Napoleon legacy, and by an important role of history classes at school (everybody in France knows France has been a major power, that France was a trailblazer in establishing Democracy etc.). These history classes are quite France-centered, except for the covering of ancient times and 20st century. As such, the French sure feel special when compared to the rest of the world. History classes aren't the main reason of anti-americanism, very far from it (rather, they're the most important reason of pro-americanism, thanks to the extensive teachings on WW2), but they partly explain why the French feel so special.

Thus their leading role in the formation of the European Union for example. They resent that America has taken over the leadership position in spreading "enlightened" civilization to a relatively uncivilized world.

I think it is indeed one of the reasons why some right-wingers are anti-American. But then again, right wingers are mostly pro-American, and I have witnessed rightwinged Antiamericanism only during the diplomatic crisis. Whereas, all the people I've talked to who say "we should support the US for once, because of what they done during WW2" are right wingers or right-oriented. Here, the few who supported the war did so out of pro-Americanism, and the belief the US were a great Nation that will bring freedom to Iraq.

There is a mistake that you must not make, Ned. The French support towards Chirac wasn't purely antiamerican. As a matter of fact, antiamericanism was far from being even the main reason. The main reason was that, to us, war should have been avoided until all other methods have been exhausted. To many of us, the inspection regime seemed to be working. Chirac and Bush have both tried to get the moral high ground : Chirac was promoting peace, and Bush was promoting democracy. To the French, peace was a higher moral ground, especially since the US motivations were obviously not that noble.

There has been a use of antiamericanism in the campaign though :
- to mobilize the far left and far right (LePenites tend to hate anything out of our borders, even though it is a tad more complex).
- to have the French population think the US didn't give a rat's ass about democracy in Iraq. The emphasis on the links between Bush and christian fundamentalists, as well as the use of the 'crusade' word were used to further the support for peace.

But most French believe the new "cowboys" in charge of the American government are repeating the mistakes that the French and other Europeans made in the 19th and 20th centuries during their colonial periods. Is this a correct summary?

I wouldn't say "Most French", because most French don't think about it. But it is true that most people who think about the 'white man's burden' aspect of colonization think it was a mistake, and can link it to what the US is doing.

I personally sure do, and am appalled.

[Spiffor]

Originally posted by Ned
Spiffor, welcome to the world. The US media has a long history of uncovering the dirty on dirty politics. Right now, FOX and its allied media are on the warpath against the French. There is nothing the US government can do about it, and you should know that.

Yes, and I assume De Villepin knows that too.

De Villepin's thesis seem to be that the US government is behind FOX's assault. I really doubt that. But if you or anyone has any evidence that the US government has fed FOX false information about France, I may change my tune here.

I think De Villepin's thesis is that the US government is collaborating with FOX' smear campain, even if it is not masterminding it. This collaboration takes the form of rumors spread by anonymous sources from the US government (notably the intelligence services), which are denied by the French. An example that has been used in Le Monde's article was the smuggled passports affair.

I'm sure De Villepin would love to shut the FOX up, but knows it is impossible. So, he attempts to end the Gov's collaboration with this smear campaign.

I don't know if these collaborations are proven, and nobody here can know that. However, it is not unlikely that some services within the US gov do give information opposed to France's image to the media. I don't think it is a big conspiracy of the US gov as a whole, but I'm sure there are some anti-French officials who use their services to have anti-French crap spout on TV.

[Worthingtons]

I think it's much of a situation whereby Certain factions of the Media are very much into French Bashing (who blames them?) and while the US are not directly collaborating with them, they are not actively trying to put a stop to it.
I dont blame the US govt for laying idle on this issue though. For France to get away totally scot-free would be an Injustice.

[GePap]

Originally posted by Rothy
I think it's much of a situation whereby Certain factions of the Media are very much into French Bashing (who blames them?) and while the US are not directly collaborating with them, they are not actively trying to put a stop to it.
I dont blame the US govt for laying idle on this issue though. For France to get away totally scot-free would be an Injustice.

Scot free with what? excersising their soverign rights to an independent foreing policy? Wow, silly foreigners! they should know only US (and maybe Uk) positions matter......