Indictment by grand jury is no big deal as an indicator of if/how well you'll do at trial. A grand jury only considers what the prosecution brings, so it's a one sided, minimal view to see if there's enough to even charge you.
Indicting you on a lot of counts is also generally (unless you really got caught with your hands in a lot of cookie jars) a tactic to lead into plea bargain. "We've got maybe one low end charge we can stick him with, and maybe, just maybe, we'll sell the jury on one or two more, if we're lucky. Let's see if we can find a way to charge him with half a dozen things, and plea him down to two. That's better than we know we could get at trial."
What you have to consider is what kind of jury pool are you likely to draw in your county, and how do you think you'd be seen by them? How is the prosecutor usually perceived by them? The problem with all trials, civil or criminal, is that unless the case is open and shut, one way or another, you're gambling on human psychology, so you have to have a good idea about the humans you're gambling your life on.
Indicting you on a lot of counts is also generally (unless you really got caught with your hands in a lot of cookie jars) a tactic to lead into plea bargain. "We've got maybe one low end charge we can stick him with, and maybe, just maybe, we'll sell the jury on one or two more, if we're lucky. Let's see if we can find a way to charge him with half a dozen things, and plea him down to two. That's better than we know we could get at trial."
What you have to consider is what kind of jury pool are you likely to draw in your county, and how do you think you'd be seen by them? How is the prosecutor usually perceived by them? The problem with all trials, civil or criminal, is that unless the case is open and shut, one way or another, you're gambling on human psychology, so you have to have a good idea about the humans you're gambling your life on.
Comment