Originally posted by UnOrthOdOx
I have three concerns on him. None are about his abrasive conduct.
I have three concerns on him. None are about his abrasive conduct.
Originally posted by UnOrthOdOx
First: He has expressed a desire to win by any means. This is so whole heartedly against our philosophy I find it hard to believe he'ld accept our stance.
First: He has expressed a desire to win by any means. This is so whole heartedly against our philosophy I find it hard to believe he'ld accept our stance.
Which again brings up the same problem with us as he had with Sarantium; everyone here has a RL, and while people might dedicate a good portion of time to the game, they cannot be held away from RL if it starts taking up more time.
Originally posted by UnOrthOdOx
Second: I would very much like to set us up to our traditional 'first one who can play the save, does' philosophy reguarding turnplaying. Gives everyone a chance if they want to play. An anything to win attitude is not the person I want playing saves.
Second: I would very much like to set us up to our traditional 'first one who can play the save, does' philosophy reguarding turnplaying. Gives everyone a chance if they want to play. An anything to win attitude is not the person I want playing saves.
Originally posted by UnOrthOdOx
Third: He mentions in his PM he sees himself as needed to 'balance out' the 'disney' teams. I don't need someone with grudges on the team.
Third: He mentions in his PM he sees himself as needed to 'balance out' the 'disney' teams. I don't need someone with grudges on the team.
Originally posted by UnOrthOdOx
That said, I would be for allowing him so long as he understands our position and accepts that Kloreep or myself could remove his authorization if we deem him getting out of line.
That said, I would be for allowing him so long as he understands our position and accepts that Kloreep or myself could remove his authorization if we deem him getting out of line.
Comment