Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Oppositions to Arabs

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Most players play most games on new maps, so the geographic argument against the Arabs is meaningless for the basic civ game, which ahs always been centered around brand new maps, since on a world map, you know where everything is at the start.
    The Arabs re a great addition to the civ game. The problem is not too mnay, but too few. Its too bad the graphics are getting to a point that it is difficualt for most players to add new things sinc ethye lack the computer graphics skills to add all the necessary paraphenalia.
    If you don't like reality, change it! me
    "Oh no! I am bested!" Drake
    "it is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong" Voltaire
    "Patriotism is a pernecious, psychopathic form of idiocy" George Bernard Shaw

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Gangerolf
      actually we should have more middle eastern civs, like the Assyrians, Hittites and a couple more i can't remember right now
      Yeah, like the Phoenicians too.
      Liberty or death, what we so proudly hail. Once you provoke her, rattling of her tail.
      Never begins it, never, but once engaged. Never surrenders, showing the fangs of rage.
      -Metallica, 'Don't Tread On Me'

      Comment


      • #33
        I don't play on the world maps so a crowded Europe doesn't bother me too much (Something about the British Isle appearing to be off the coast of spain that puts me off). New civs shouldn't be chosen based on how they will fit on a world map but by what impact they had on the world.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Ikarus


          Yeah, like the Phoenicians too.
          Thats more mediterranean, stupid
          "I bet Ikarus eats his own spunk..."
          - BLACKENED from America's Army: Operations
          Kramerman - Creator and Author of The Epic Tale of Navalon in the Civ III Stories Forum

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by Kramerman


            Thats more mediterranean, stupid
            It could be argued both.

            The name-calling is unneccessary.
            Liberty or death, what we so proudly hail. Once you provoke her, rattling of her tail.
            Never begins it, never, but once engaged. Never surrenders, showing the fangs of rage.
            -Metallica, 'Don't Tread On Me'

            Comment


            • #36
              actually, a great way of putting it would be a canaanite civilization. . Both Hebrews and Phoenicians are a part of the canaanite people that had common heritage language group ( the languages ,are very similar, and one could probably get confused between them ). The hebrews were the one part of those group of people that first raised the level of their primary deity to a monotheistic god., while the phoenicians dominated trade. there are several less known , and much smaller kingdom.

              The cities of this civilization would be ancient cities of Israel, and what is now Jordan and Lebanon, The Carthaginian cities ( because Cathargo is basically a phoenician city-state ) , Cities that the phoenicians had all around the middle east , and the new Israeli cities.

              If firaxis could do this by lumping all mesapotamic civilizations into a 'Babylon' , I think that it could be done to the nations that lived and still live in the East Med , Including the ones that , for some reason, call themselves arabs.
              urgh.NSFW

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by rob.derosa
                England is 5000 years old, may not be the oldest, but certainly older than America with only a few centuries. Why not replace the Americans with the Inca, much better.
                1) america influence(d/s) the world a lot more than inca, iroquois, maya, sioux, etc... even though it only exists since a few centuries.

                2) civ3 is primarily programmed for western countries and mainly for america. by including the americans they could sell it better ...

                i could bet you, that most (non-hardcore) players play mainly their own civ
                - Artificial Intelligence usually beats real stupidity
                - Atheism is a nonprophet organization.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by sabrewolf


                  1) america influence(d/s) the world a lot more than inca, iroquois, maya, sioux, etc... even though it only exists since a few centuries.

                  2) civ3 is primarily programmed for western countries and mainly for america. by including the americans they could sell it better ...

                  i could bet you, that most (non-hardcore) players play mainly their own civ
                  I was doing pointless ranting

                  Being kinda patriotic

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by sabrewolf
                    1) america influence(d/s) the world a lot more than inca, iroquois, maya, sioux, etc... even though it only exists since a few centuries.
                    I'm thinking that the world influenced America even more ...
                    A horse! A horse! Mingapulco for a horse! Someone must give chase to Brave Sir Robin and get those missing flags ...
                    Project Lead of Might and Magic Tribute

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by Ribannah
                      I'm thinking that the world influenced America even more ...
                      presently TRYING to, but not really successful
                      - Artificial Intelligence usually beats real stupidity
                      - Atheism is a nonprophet organization.

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by sabrewolf


                        presently TRYING to, but not really successful
                        LOL.

                        I think it isn't necessarily about "what civs influenced the world the most" as opposed "what civs are interesting/neat." Which just naturally includes the civs of their customers (or maybe that part is just patriotism).

                        Though, if I was going to vote on what civilization influenced the world the most....I'd go with the Greeks (I think they probably win hands down).
                        May reason keep you,

                        Blue Moose

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Originally posted by Blue Moose
                          Though, if I was going to vote on what civilization influenced the world the most....I'd go with the Greeks (I think they probably win hands down).
                          haha,
                          totally off-topic, but your post reminded me of "a big fat greek wedding" ... it's a must-see
                          whoever saw this one will understand, what made me laugh

                          but to bring it back on-topic:
                          i honestly can't decide which civ had the biggest influence.

                          you could group it by categories (e.g.)
                          scientificly: greeks (philosophy)
                          militaristically: romans, maybe also chinese

                          or by time
                          or geographicly...

                          but i really can't think of THE most influentual civilization.
                          - Artificial Intelligence usually beats real stupidity
                          - Atheism is a nonprophet organization.

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Originally posted by panag
                            hi ,

                            if they go for N-africa its fine , .....

                            but they should only be in if the Israeli are in , ....

                            Firaxis , please include them !

                            have a nice day
                            My sentiments exactly. I would've really like to have seen the Israelites/Israelis in PTW, especially since the Arabs are now in. They're an ancient Civ and have contributed greatly to the culture of the world.

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Originally posted by sabrewolf

                              but i really can't think of THE most influentual civilization.
                              I would say Romans, as they sread their culture all through Europe/Asia.

                              of course, they were influenced by the Greeks...
                              I'm going to rub some stakes on my face and pour beer on my chest while I listen Guns'nRoses welcome to the jungle and watch porno. Lesbian porno.
                              Supercitzen Pekka

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Yes, the Romans indeed... according to Western history

                                I think the answer depends entirely on how you define the different 'civilizations'... I hate to sound like a smart-ass, but I believe that's true.

                                I might say that the most influential civilizations in their respective parts of the world have been the Chinese, the Greeks ('Hellenistic' civ), the Indians, and the Arabs.

                                On a more worldwide level, I think I must acknowledge that the most influential civilization of all has been the 'Western' one. In second place, the Arabs again... consider how widely Islamic civilization has spread, and thus impacted the regional cultures (the Mid-East, most of Africa, the Balkans, Central Asia, India, and South-east Asia).

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X