Tweet
And that's followed by an offer from GoW, which I'm also dismissing in-game since we have some serious ambassadorial negotiations to take care of first.
-
-
I forgot that the worker "3" from EotS is mining, not roading, since I hadn't been planning the chop quite yet at the time he got his orders. So I have to use the worker who's been mining for Tornado next to the forest to start the chop right now. That may possibly cost us a couple gold, but food and shields won't be problems.Comment
-
Score information:
130 (+3) Gathering Storm
137 (+3) Demogyptica
115 (+2) Glory of War
144 (+3) Role Play
101 (+2) Vox Controli
150 (+2) Legoland
Vox broke 100!Comment
-
Turn and screenshots sent. I won't have time to start a thread for next turn until this evening U.S. time.Comment
-
For what it's worth, I like Aeson's plan better. We will lose a tiny bit of gain from settling a hill instead of a desert, but the defensive advantage, and settling the city on the river without taking any fps is enough for me.Originally posted by nbarclay
I don't think we've really made a final decision between your city placement plan and DeepO's (with the border treaty adjustments) yet, and that's something we need to do in a hurry so we can build our road network accordingly. Your plan is definitely nice from a defense perspective, but I haven't seen or gotten around to doing enough economic analysis to be sure its economics are as good.
Up North, there might be one change needed (IIRC), but that won't make any difference on improvements... and I have to look at the screenies again to see if I was not mistaken.
DeepOComment
Comment