The Altera Centauri collection has been brought up to date by Darsnan. It comprises every decent scenario he's been able to find anywhere on the web, going back over 20 years.
25 themes/skins/styles are now available to members. Check the select drop-down at the bottom-left of each page.
Call To Power 2 Cradle 3+ mod in progress: https://apolyton.net/forum/other-games/call-to-power-2/ctp2-creation/9437883-making-cradle-3-fully-compatible-with-the-apolyton-edition
Originally posted by DeepO
Nathan, did you post the 'what to research?' message to Vox already? It's not in the logs, but I thought you mentioned somewhere that you were sending it... can't find the thread, and can't remember exactly neither (I know, I've been living in a dream state lately, my memory is abandoning me )
I just sent out my revised version reflecting our latest communication with RP. (My plans to send the original version yesterday were disrupted when NYE showed up with some concerns, but it looks like the consensus to go for Republic is still solid.)
nathan - I remembered math - it is on the table - but forgot contact with Lux. Diss or I will make sure it is there next turn. Have you heard how they are doing? From everything I have read it doesn't look like they are going to make it.
This comes from a message to Nathan from BH, and to me proves that proves they don't "forget" to include/deliver on time, but are doing purposely....
Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing?
Then why call him God? - Epicurus
It appears that Nathan did not reply to Beta's enquiry as to why we wanted contact with Lux. I can't say I blame them for 'forgetting'.
They were working on a deal and did not want us to upset it. Without their assurances that we would not, would we have done any different if the roles were reversed?
(\__/)
(='.'=)
(")_(") This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your signature to help him gain world domination.
Have we lied? Have we "forgotten" agreed upon items?
Let's burn'em.
The greatest delight for man is to inflict defeat on his enemies, to drive them before him, to see those dear to them with their faces bathed in tears, to bestride their horses, to crush in his arms their daughters and wives.
The greatest delight for man is to inflict defeat on his enemies, to drive them before him, to see those dear to them with their faces bathed in tears, to bestride their horses, to crush in his arms their daughters and wives.
Voxes last message reads like I approved the move of Lux. This is not correct. Shiber had called me in the chat, and all I said there is, that this matter needs to be discussed and ratified in the team and that I will post a thread.
Just for correction. I'm still against, and should they have done it, I'd even consider to take the city with a lone warrior and gift it back to Vox.
If Lux doesn't pop rush a defender next turn, they won't be able to hold onto the city if we force the issue unless Vox is willing to attack Hack to stop him (and they'd have to win the fight). Possible exception: if Lux could build a city and give it away with troops inside, that would teleport the troops to our continent (I think), but they'd have to get the timing right to complete the deal in time. We need to decide whether, if the city is still size 2 when our next turn comes, we want to try to take Lux out. (And we may also have a diplomatic crisis if Vox or Lux notices the possibility.)
I'd even consider to take the city with a lone warrior and gift it back to Vox.
I agree on this matter, (well I should, since I mentioned it earlier ). The least we should is threaten them with it.
Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing?
Then why call him God? - Epicurus
Comment