Originally posted by vulture
If we need a good name for the maneouver, how about "operation cross dresser", given the importance of the trannies involved (or were they secretely DDs dressed up as transports), it seems appropriate.
If we need a good name for the maneouver, how about "operation cross dresser", given the importance of the trannies involved (or were they secretely DDs dressed up as transports), it seems appropriate.
Might it be worth saving the bombers for attacking tanks as and when they are exposed. With 8 attack, they aren't that great odds vs the infantry, but can do more damage vs the tanks (defence 8.8). That might increase the no. of hps damage done by bombers, although to tanks rather than infantry. Not sure if that would make a difference, but if the problem is being 3 or 4 attackers short, you never know.
Doesn't that gets down to same problem? We have less hps on the tanks, but more on the infs. And as these are harder, we end up losing more units on them again.
I'm thinking on tanks, and retreating. And also on how we can maximize the hp we've got on those marines. All the marines can be lost, if every single hp was used to its fullest extent, meanwhile trying to keep the chances of promotions down.
DeepO
Comment