Radical Idea

[vulture]

Regarding Vox troops already in our territory, would we rather have them around to attack and try to go for a leader, of have Vox disband them as part of a peace treaty? I'd be loath to sign any kind of peace deal that in any way let them heal their units, group them into one big stack, and come at us again (and retake Elipolis before we can get a significant defence in it), so I think that disbanding any undamaged troops in our territory is a must (and we kill off the damaged ones). But I really, really doubt they'd go for that.

[Shiber]

No, I think it's best if they don't disband their troops. That way we can bombard them down to 1hp and take them out with minimal losses, and get promotions and chances for another GL.

[alva]

Besides, having them in our territory, they pose les of a threat as we can keep an eye on them.
-
Shiber: maybe include this one.
" Any city flipping (back) to them is to returned immediately."

[zeit]

Like I said, I like the terms, and some proposal from us could throw them of guard in some sense. I don't think we should show our cards outright. Waiting a few turns could work for our advantage, but what we want is not peace, but Vox's surrender- giving us about half of what was their territory and Iron monopoly. We have to show them we want to end their war, but we have to stand behind our demand that they pay the price of their agression. In order to manage that we have to have a real advantage- and ability to threaten them.

Once again- the terms are good, and leave them almost no chance of seriously attacking us again.

Edit: grammar

[Shiber]

Originally posted by alva
Shiber: maybe include this one.
" Any city flipping (back) to them is to returned immediately."