Green city!

[TORARADICAL]

Here is the Fiscal Worksheet for our city. Thanks to Uber KruX for the format. Addit:There is also a downloadable version of it at the bottom of the post.

[Inverse Icarus]

I made the format, not GF

[TORARADICAL]

Oops. My bad, I'll change it. Sorry. I owe you a couple drinks for that.

[GhengisFarbâ„¢]

Originally posted by Uber KruX
I made the format, not GF

First they steal your tile.


Then steal you spreadsheet.


Bad day for Uber.

[conmcb25]

Originally posted by GhengisFarb

First they steal your tile.

There is no "they", only "me" in that statement, muhahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

[Aeson]

My Mountain gives a shield, not commerce.

[TORARADICAL]

Ya, I had just thought of that actually. I typed the commerce and production backwards. Sorry. I'm correcting it now, and will have a correct one up soon.

[TORARADICAL]

This one should be correct. And a new attachement of it as well.

[TORARADICAL]

In case each city is to decide for themselves, I would suggest we use the equal price, as I have found it to be a lot more relaible.

[Jonny]

I prefer the equal price method as well.

[GhengisFarbâ„¢]

Guild Pricing:
Equal Split


Equal Price
Toraradical
Jonny

Yet to vote:
Aeson
Makahlua

Have you decided on your City's leadership yet?

[Aeson]

I don't really care which method. Equal price will screw me a bit more than the other way... but I choose the tile knowing it was one of the worst. Someone(s) were going to get left out and it's more fun playing from a weak start.

Are we setting everything forever? Or just for this trading turn? I think we should each give a vote of the percentage for each good for each trading session (no vote means equal split... or last known split?), then average those together to get a total.

So I would give 100% to shields (as that's all I have represented)... and the rest of you would give your ideal splits. That would mean shields are at .25 from me if no one else wants to give anything to shields, as there are 4 of us. This would give us a lot of extra negotiating opportunities, and extra strategic decisions, which should be fun.

[GhengisFarbâ„¢]

I think the plan is to set distribution before each trading session so it isn't set for all time.

[TORARADICAL]

Have you decided on your City's leadership yet?

Well, GF, I said I'd do it, if they wanted, and then Jonny said he wanted to do it, so it is pretty much him.

Are we setting everything forever? Or just for this trading turn?

I think we should set up everything forever, or at least until a majority decides we want to change it. That way we won't end up wasting time each session on a new vote.

I think we should each give a vote of the percentage for each good for each trading session (no vote means equal split... or last known split?), then average those together to get a total.

So I would give 100% to shields (as that's all I have represented)... and the rest of you would give your ideal splits. That would mean shields are at .25 from me if no one else wants to give anything to shields, as there are 4 of us. This would give us a lot of extra negotiating opportunities, and extra strategic decisions, which should be fun.

This would have each of us currently getting $75 no matter what. Very Communist and therefore something I frown on. In some cities they are giving certain members bonus's in auctions on the first settler. I would not be adverse to doing this for you.
Okay y'all, we still need to decide what the worker is doing. I would suggest that we road each of our squares, and then mine each of them.

[TORARADICAL]

I think the plan is to set distribution before each trading session so it isn't set for all time.

Well if such is going to be the case I would be for equal split this session as it gives me more money.
So if we are deciding each session then I change my vote.