Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Stop the America-bashing!

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Re: Eh? What you chatting 'bout?

    Originally posted by Big Crunch
    Further, with the EU's integration we feel stronger as an economic bloc.
    Crunch,
    I agree with the rest of your post but I thought all this talk of EU "integration" was funny coming from a guy who's avatar shows the "dis-integration" of a British flag into an English one.

    Just my little attempt at irony...
    Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

    Comment


    • #17
      ok, i'm not sure if you were supporting us or not, but i'm thinking not:

      Originally posted by Trifna


      So I'll try to put some distinctive stuff...

      it is the culture of:
      fast-food
      fast-everything
      free market
      comsumption society


      All this seems pretty representative of what they think, how they think, who they are: representative of their culture. It's a culture of "as a person, do what you desire in the limit of the laws". the generalities of American culture seems pretty distinctive to me. The mix of culture they are made a long way from what it was originally, the whole is bigger enough from the sum of the parts.
      (bold, mine)

      that part in bold, it's called freedom
      Prince of...... the Civ Mac Forum

      Comment


      • #18
        Er, no. It's called ego-centrism, rather.
        The laws define the extent of a citizen's freedom.

        Trifna is correct, the USA is the ultimate consumption society.
        A horse! A horse! Mingapulco for a horse! Someone must give chase to Brave Sir Robin and get those missing flags ...
        Project Lead of Might and Magic Tribute

        Comment


        • #19
          Civilization III uses "civilizations" from different periods/groupings:

          I: Ancient Times
          Egyptians
          Babylonians
          Greeks
          Romans
          Persians

          II: Cultural Perpetuations
          Chinese
          Indians

          III: Indigenous Tribes
          Aztecs
          Zulus
          Iroquois

          IV: Colonial Times
          English
          French
          Russians

          V: Nation-States
          Germans
          Japanese

          VI: Modern Times
          Americans

          Please correct me on any of the above. It's just a rough grouping I did in a couple of minutes. No flaming, please!

          The point is that they're all from different periods of time or groupings. Thus, the Americans are not in the same category of "civilization" as the English, who are not the same category of civilization as the Chinese or the Greeks.

          By the way, has anyone completed the mathematics on the number of turns for each civilization in its height?
          "I've spent more time posting than playing."

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Oerdin
            No doubt he typed this while wearing blue jeans, eating a Big Mac, and possibly even listening to rock and roll. Cheers.
            jeans - traditional workwear. Was it invented in the US?

            Big Mac - hamburgers are definitely not an US invention.

            Rock and Roll - don't think that's a US invention, either.
            (\__/) 07/07/1937 - Never forget
            (='.'=) "Claims demand evidence; extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence." -- Carl Sagan
            (")_(") "Starting the fire from within."

            Comment


            • #21
              Simple fact checking would make you look a lot less silly, UR:
              jeans - traditional workwear. Was it invented in the US?
              Yes, it was invented in the U.S. 1872, Levi Strauss brings it to the scene in a profound way. Prior to that: Immigrant weavers from Yorkshire, England, produced heavy cotton fustians -- cotton-twill jeans -- from a cloth mill in Massachusetts as early as 1638. In 1789 George Washington toured a mill in Massachusetts that was weaving both denim and jean. By 1849 a New York manufacturer was advertising topcoats, vests and short jackets in blue jean.
              Big Mac - hamburgers are definitely not an US invention.
              Dude, nobody is talking about the inventing but the marketing and mass recognition of a CERTAIN and AMERICAN hamburger.
              Rock and Roll - don't think that's a US invention, either
              I guess this is just a troll, but: African musical traits were brought to the U.S. beginning in 1619 and fused with the European music brought by the colonists. Hard to believe you are A) this ignorant B) this hard up for a troll and/or C)this lazy not to look up basic facts.
              I've been on these boards for a long time and I still don't know what to think when it comes to you -- FrantzX, December 21, 2001

              "Yin": Your friendly, neighborhood negative cosmic force.

              Comment


              • #22
                Time-triggers

                It would be great if Civilization III could have time-triggers that allow Civs like the Americans to "emerge" after a certain point in history or an event (like a certain civilization advance).

                For example, the English civilization falls into disarray after its capital is conquered by the Russians. So, a few cities declare independence and change their city names to American ones.

                This would be kind of like in Civilization II. Has anyone seen this happen in Civilization III yet? I don't think it does any more.

                Also, in Civilization II new Civs would emerge when a Civ was destroyed. These would catch up very quickly, too. This could be a way to introduce Civs like the Americans in the latter part of the game. This doesn't happen either does it?
                "I've spent more time posting than playing."

                Comment


                • #23
                  Actually, to get this straight, some of you are calling BigMacs(TM), Blue jeans and Rock'n'Roll "cultural achievements"????? Mon dieu...

                  USA should be (and is) in for one reason:

                  It's the worlds largest gaming software market. That's all.

                  And... I don't really feel quite comfortable with all that USA bashing either... don't you think it's time to move on? If you don't like USA, don't use em (even change the BIC file so they are not in the game anyway).

                  But stop doing this, it's tiresome...

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by Oerdin
                    I agree with the rest of your post but I thought all this talk of EU "integration" was funny coming from a guy who's avatar shows the "dis-integration" of a British flag into an English one.
                    Well the sooner the whole of Europe becomes English the better.
                    One day Canada will rule the world, and then we'll all be sorry.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by YefeiPi
                      I don't know, but when I think of America, distinctive culture does not come to mind.
                      When I think of Canada, a distinctive culture doesnt come to mind either. We have a bunch of Frenchies and English speakers 99.9999999% of the world population mistake for Americans.

                      In anycase, read my post

                      AI:C3C Debug Game Report (Part1) :C3C Debug Game Report (Part2)
                      Strategy:The Machiavellian Doctrine
                      Visit my WebsiteMonkey Dew

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Why does the discussion always revert to Big Macs?

                        As far as I know, McDonald's is more popular in Beijing than in New York.

                        Anyhow, let's get back to a real discussion.

                        Any thoughts on the ideas that I have proposed?

                        Thanks.
                        "I've spent more time posting than playing."

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          I've lived in the third world, and to them, eating out at Mcdonalds and KFC are a sign of affluence. Only the small middle class and even smaller upper class can afford to eat at those places.

                          It is infact something poorer people strive for. To be able to get a peice of the American dream and eat out at an American restaurant.
                          AI:C3C Debug Game Report (Part1) :C3C Debug Game Report (Part2)
                          Strategy:The Machiavellian Doctrine
                          Visit my WebsiteMonkey Dew

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            It's also the case that a lot of middle to low-level chains in the States make MUCH nicer facilities when they open abroad. For example, Coco's Restraurant, which is just 'o.k.' in the U.S. is built like some kind of almost luxury restaurant here in Korea. The same, to some degree, for fast food places. I suppose this is because they are catering to a middle to upper class group and built accordingly.

                            At any rate, American culture can often take 'upgraded' forms in other countries that make Americans (or other Westerners) think: "Why do they think Coco's is such a big deal? Gee, they must be really hard up."
                            I've been on these boards for a long time and I still don't know what to think when it comes to you -- FrantzX, December 21, 2001

                            "Yin": Your friendly, neighborhood negative cosmic force.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Re: Why does the discussion always revert to Big Macs?

                              Originally posted by siredgar
                              As far as I know, McDonald's is more popular in Beijing than in New York.

                              Anyhow, let's get back to a real discussion.

                              Any thoughts on the ideas that I have proposed?

                              Thanks.
                              I've just started CivIII, and am not up on all the details yet, but you have aroused my curiosity. Do you know when in the game the turns shorten? I'll start working on the math.

                              My thoughts towards having America as a civ are this: IT'S A GAME!!! Not meant to be historically accurate! Otherwise, carriers wouldn't be in danger from Man-O-War's, and tanks would roll over almost all opposition save other modern era units.

                              I love America. I've lived here all my life. And for those of you who say that "Doing whatever you want within the limits of the law is 'ego-centrasism'", I pity your limited understanding and ask that if you do not understand something...then do not criticize it.

                              As for American arrogance...this might be a shocker, but not all Amercans are arrogant. That is like saying all French are rude (which is not true. The few French people that I've known so far were very nice). Again I ask you to reserve your criticism until you actually know what you are talking about.

                              But, I digress...Siredgar has a point. For those who must see the reasoning, let's work together. I'll start trying to do the math, but if any of you are willing to help, it would be welcome.

                              siredgar, I'll see what I can figure out, but any info you could give me would be useful. Thank you.
                              Why did I join the Army?
                              Free Food
                              Free Bullets
                              And it sure beats working for a living...

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                ntyatecafe,

                                A big welcome to you! While I've been playing the Civilization series since the original computer version, I am relatively new to the site, too.

                                Anyhow, I'm glad to see your enthusiasm! This would be a more scientific approach, I would think, than just talking about Big Macs and blue jeans.

                                Does anybody have the breakdown of how many years it takes for one turn during different parts of the game? That would help a lot!

                                Regardless, I'll take a stab starting with the Egyptians and Americans:

                                Supposedly, they flourished for 3,000 years. This only equals 60 turns!

                                However, I think before we debate this issue, it's important to determine whether it should be the civilization's "height" or the period they existed. For example, the Americans have existed for about 225 years (that's 225 turns!) However, they have had significant power for only about 100 years, that is 100 turns.

                                Nevertheless, that is still more turns than the Egyptians!

                                Interesting, hmmm?

                                What do you people think?

                                Thanks.

                                Edgar
                                "I've spent more time posting than playing."

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X