Keep the other thread, started by Epik, clean...
Keep using this thread for game organisation, rules, etc but use Epik's WHEMDD thread for the diplo stories.
---
With tech stealing I think it's really important that it be seen as an act of war and needs to be part of the civs stories.
So, if Epik has stolen from Makeo it makes sense for there to be a greater chance of war between these two civs.
Ie, Dangimes warning about 'friendly tech stealing' in a 'no tech trade' game is very important for us to guard against. We need to trust each other and work it in to the stories. War must make some sense.
Likewise with no alliances. It is expected that the first civ you meet is likely to be a 'friend' and that a peace treaty would most likely be signed but there should be no collusion, no co-ordinating of tactics etc. We are 6 civs AGAINST each other.
Are we all on the same page? Have I got it right?
Keep using this thread for game organisation, rules, etc but use Epik's WHEMDD thread for the diplo stories.
---
With tech stealing I think it's really important that it be seen as an act of war and needs to be part of the civs stories.
So, if Epik has stolen from Makeo it makes sense for there to be a greater chance of war between these two civs.
Ie, Dangimes warning about 'friendly tech stealing' in a 'no tech trade' game is very important for us to guard against. We need to trust each other and work it in to the stories. War must make some sense.
Likewise with no alliances. It is expected that the first civ you meet is likely to be a 'friend' and that a peace treaty would most likely be signed but there should be no collusion, no co-ordinating of tactics etc. We are 6 civs AGAINST each other.
Are we all on the same page? Have I got it right?
Comment