Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

1000 civgroup members

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by alva
    What a creative and legal way to get +1's j/k

    Good work Gramphs

    Oh is this really legal?

    Anyway,
    Be good, and if at first you don't succeed, perhaps failure will be back in fashion soon. -- teh Spamski

    Grapefruit Garden

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Skanky Burns
      Is that 1000 unique members? Or are people in more than 1 civgroup counted multiple times?
      Are DLs included?
      Be good, and if at first you don't succeed, perhaps failure will be back in fashion soon. -- teh Spamski

      Grapefruit Garden

      Comment


      • #18
        Do civgroups include nationstates and galciv?

        Comment


        • #19
          Do civgroups include nationstates and galciv?
          Yes.

          Is that 1000 unique members? Or are people in more than 1 civgroup counted multiple times?
          To the best of my knowledge, 1K unique. Otherwise, we would be around 5K, with people like Trip, Apoc, and those who are in lots of CivGroups.

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Asuka
            Ack, more people wearing dull little icons like some stupid badges. Those would be better in the member profile pages.
            wow, did someone put on their cranky-pants this morning?

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by Asuka


              The Civgroups pages serve that purpose better, IMO.
              The Civgroups are little tucked away things that I doubt (m)any of the n00bs that could use them most notice. Badges work nicely as they are, thank you.
              meet the new boss, same as the old boss

              Comment


              • #22
                is there a Freeciv civgroup?
                American by birth, smarter than the average tropical fruit by the grace of Me. -me
                I try not to break the rules but merely to test their elasticity. -- Bill Veeck | Don't listed to the Linux Satanist, people. - St. Leo | If patching security holes was the top priority of any of us(no matter the OS), we'd do nothing else. - Me, in a tired and accidental attempt to draw fire from all three sides.
                Posted with Mozilla Firebird running under Sawfish on a Slackware Linux install.:p
                XGalaga.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Why would there need to be?

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    I can't think of any reason why. I was just curious.
                    American by birth, smarter than the average tropical fruit by the grace of Me. -me
                    I try not to break the rules but merely to test their elasticity. -- Bill Veeck | Don't listed to the Linux Satanist, people. - St. Leo | If patching security holes was the top priority of any of us(no matter the OS), we'd do nothing else. - Me, in a tired and accidental attempt to draw fire from all three sides.
                    Posted with Mozilla Firebird running under Sawfish on a Slackware Linux install.:p
                    XGalaga.

                    Comment


                    • #25


                      Cool, but we can always use more active DG participants.

                      Especially in the Civ2DG.

                      Lots of positions open in our next elections. Don't like the current administration, you can run yourself.
                      Scouse Git (2) La Fayette Adam Smith Solomwi and Loinburger will not be forgotten.
                      "Remember the night we broke the windows in this old house? This is what I wished for..."
                      2015 APOLYTON FANTASY FOOTBALL CHAMPION!

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Maybe we should add a HoF civgroup, get all the people in that need to be, and then is there a way to restrict membership past that?
                        meet the new boss, same as the old boss

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by Asuka
                          The Civgroups pages serve that purpose better, IMO.
                          Nope, a lot of the people there are inactive, so that page means little for some groups.
                          Administrator of WePlayCiv -- Civ5 Info Centre | Forum | Gallery

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            And who here really visits the civgroup pages anyway? without the sidebar links to them under people's names, they're a pain to visit
                            -->Visit CGN!
                            -->"Production! More Production! Production creates Wealth! Production creates more Jobs!"-Wendell Willkie -1944

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Meh, wear your fancy icons then. However they simply clutter the left column of the postbit and make the avatar less visible.
                              "Kids, don't listen to uncle Solver unless you want your parents to spank you." - Solver

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                It looks a bit chaotic at times I agree but it serves it purpose well.
                                Why does it make the avatar less visible?

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X