Almost forgot. Ecostats.
MY 2165
Morgan:
minerals: 95 (+32 support=127) Decrease= -6+2=-4
credits: 222
labs: 30
production: 25 rows
Sparta:
minerals: 150 (+31 support=181) Increase= 3+1=4
credits: -2
labs: 33.6
production: 16 rows (+3 MM)
MY 2166
Morgan:
minerals: 92 (+36=128) Increase= -3+4=1
credits: 250
labs: 3
production: 19 rows
Sparta:
minerals: 143 (+36=179) Decrease= -7+5=-2
credits: -4
labs: 32.8
production: 26 rows (+6 MM)
With "production" I mean what's the worth in mineral rows of all the stuff we'll finish the year after. Eg for us that'll be extraordinary well: six crawlers, some aircraft etc... Advantage of this measurement is that it corrects for the SE Industry bonus, takes into account energy hurrying etc, instead of having to measure them seperately. Drawback is that there's a lots of variance in this value, making it harder to compare the size of our economies. For example in '64 we produced 5 rows, in '62 40...
with "MM" I mean Maniac Manoeuvre/Method, ie the cash in crawler, and retire unit design method. You have to count that seperately, else you'd be counting crawlers built for that purpose twice in your production value.
Oh yeah, as you can see, due to our war production,our support costs are taking up a bigger and bigger portion of our total mineral production which is hardly growing.
(So let's popboom to solve that
)
MY 2165
Morgan:
minerals: 95 (+32 support=127) Decrease= -6+2=-4
credits: 222
labs: 30
production: 25 rows
Sparta:
minerals: 150 (+31 support=181) Increase= 3+1=4
credits: -2
labs: 33.6
production: 16 rows (+3 MM)
MY 2166
Morgan:
minerals: 92 (+36=128) Increase= -3+4=1
credits: 250
labs: 3
production: 19 rows
Sparta:
minerals: 143 (+36=179) Decrease= -7+5=-2
credits: -4
labs: 32.8
production: 26 rows (+6 MM)
With "production" I mean what's the worth in mineral rows of all the stuff we'll finish the year after. Eg for us that'll be extraordinary well: six crawlers, some aircraft etc... Advantage of this measurement is that it corrects for the SE Industry bonus, takes into account energy hurrying etc, instead of having to measure them seperately. Drawback is that there's a lots of variance in this value, making it harder to compare the size of our economies. For example in '64 we produced 5 rows, in '62 40...
with "MM" I mean Maniac Manoeuvre/Method, ie the cash in crawler, and retire unit design method. You have to count that seperately, else you'd be counting crawlers built for that purpose twice in your production value.
Oh yeah, as you can see, due to our war production,our support costs are taking up a bigger and bigger portion of our total mineral production which is hardly growing.


Comment