As Ade says. When the big debate (for some)/brawl (for others) broke out between the P4 and the CCCP over this issue, I disagreed with TKG over the necessity of "maximum rate of technological progress" versus "sufficient technological progress in concert with a diversified social base."
It ended with TKG replying to me or another with "that's not my point" and leaving it there. Agreeing to disagree like that is a result of philosophical differences about the definition of "optimum". It will be up to representatives of differing positions to convince the people however they might before such a matter is put to vote- I very much hope reason winds up carrying more weight than posturing in the course of that process.
It ended with TKG replying to me or another with "that's not my point" and leaving it there. Agreeing to disagree like that is a result of philosophical differences about the definition of "optimum". It will be up to representatives of differing positions to convince the people however they might before such a matter is put to vote- I very much hope reason winds up carrying more weight than posturing in the course of that process.
Comment