As Ade says. When the big debate (for some)/brawl (for others) broke out between the P4 and the CCCP over this issue
, I disagreed with TKG over the necessity of "maximum rate of technological progress" versus "sufficient technological progress in concert with a diversified social base."
It ended with TKG replying to me or another with "that's not my point" and leaving it there. Agreeing to disagree like that is a result of philosophical differences about the definition of "optimum". It will be up to representatives of differing positions to convince the people however they might before such a matter is put to vote- I very much hope reason
winds up carrying more weight than posturing
in the course of that process.
![rant](https://apolyton.net/core/images/smilies/rant.gif)
It ended with TKG replying to me or another with "that's not my point" and leaving it there. Agreeing to disagree like that is a result of philosophical differences about the definition of "optimum". It will be up to representatives of differing positions to convince the people however they might before such a matter is put to vote- I very much hope reason
![yeah right!](https://apolyton.net/core/images/smilies/hm.gif)
![I said do it!!](https://apolyton.net/core/images/smilies//doitnow3.gif)
Comment