I see that others oppose some of his ideas, which is good I think, because opposition strengthens everything.
But what I miss in these opposing ideas is how it fits in a bigger picture.
Sometimes a single decision may, if you discuss it isolated, seem to be better in one way, while it's better in another way if you're after a bigger strategy.
So far mzprox is the only one delivering a long-term strategy, so I will continue to support him.
And I'm urging others to come with alternatives and improvements on the long-term ideas. I cannot support single ideas that may just be good for one or ten turns.
I'm not involved enoughin this game to contribute myself, but I can read up on ideas and weight arguments against eachother.
I know from mzprox that he's one of the best players I know. He has defeated me several times. (and yes, one time b/c luck was on his hands

So please understand that I'd rather side with someone who has a track record of being good at civ4, and who delivers a big picture and solid arguments.
Leave a comment: