I just spent most of the day play-testing this map as various civs in SP (deity level) and my results were surprising. The Tier 1&2 civs were much easier against the AI then even the Tier 6 civs. The AI did not attack so it was easy to optimize development with so many resources to win the cultural battle for Europe and claim more resource rich land. In contrast the Tier 4 & 5 civs were much more challenging to get anywhere with so many barb attacks and difficult to build the Great Wall (which may be the most important wonder race in this game) before some European civ does.
Perhaps it was just the poor AI or my particular style of play but I do not think the Tier division accurately reflects the level of difficulties of the various civs. There is no guarantee that the crowded european civs will be more aggressive towards each other in a human game either (in fact it seems unlikely given that capitals cannot be captured) so central europe will appeal to Builders while the Fringe civs will appeal to WarMongers.
I recommend reserving the Tier 6 for the weakest players in the game as they could be quite unbalanced in the hands of skilled players (I particularly fear isolated Japan's REX capabilities) but open up the rest of the civs to whoever wants them based upon their play style (Warmonger or Builder).
Perhaps it was just the poor AI or my particular style of play but I do not think the Tier division accurately reflects the level of difficulties of the various civs. There is no guarantee that the crowded european civs will be more aggressive towards each other in a human game either (in fact it seems unlikely given that capitals cannot be captured) so central europe will appeal to Builders while the Fringe civs will appeal to WarMongers.
I recommend reserving the Tier 6 for the weakest players in the game as they could be quite unbalanced in the hands of skilled players (I particularly fear isolated Japan's REX capabilities) but open up the rest of the civs to whoever wants them based upon their play style (Warmonger or Builder).
Comment