Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Dance of Civilizations [Diplo Game] [Organization Thread Pt1]

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • India (DoC)
    replied
    I can tell that I'm not gona check it, but thx anyway

    Leave a comment:


  • Robert
    replied
    Everyone got a gmail account.
    You got your account info by PM

    here are the e-mail addresses:
    doc-Rome@diplo.plomp.eu
    doc-Mali@diplo.plomp.eu
    doc-Arabia@diplo.plomp.eu
    doc-Ottomans@diplo.plomp.eu
    doc-Egypt@diplo.plomp.eu
    doc-Korea@diplo.plomp.eu
    doc-Britannia@diplo.plomp.eu
    doc-Greece@diplo.plomp.eu
    doc-Russia@diplo.plomp.eu
    doc-Byzantium@diplo.plomp.eu
    doc-England@diplo.plomp.eu
    doc-Persia@diplo.plomp.eu
    doc-India@diplo.plomp.eu
    doc-Inca@diplo.plomp.eu
    doc-Natives@diplo.plomp.eu

    Please use PM primary for DoC-related communication! Not everybody may check his gmail often!

    But please use it for vote-confirmations etc. from now on, and any other stuff you need it for. I'll put game-docs in google-docs and share it with all of you. (ie. the rate-results)

    Leave a comment:


  • Robert
    replied
    It should be in your PM box somewhere! Look for pm's from WarningU2
    otherwise try your "Russia (DoC)" login (if it hasn't been changed yet)

    Leave a comment:


  • Russia (DoC)
    replied
    can't vote...
    ain't got pw...

    Leave a comment:


  • Korea (DoC)
    replied
    Go the Phillies !!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • Korea (DoC)
    replied
    I thoguht it was once 4 people into the next era. not two eras ahead

    Leave a comment:


  • OzzyKP
    replied
    Originally posted by Korea (DoC) View Post
    So all ancient Techs are now available for free trades?

    As surely more than 4 are in classical if two are in medieval already.

    Anyone want to trade with Korzan any of the Ancient Techs ? It no cost to anyone now.
    No, four have to be in the medieval era, not the classical.

    Leave a comment:


  • Orb (DoC)
    replied
    Originally posted by Rasputin View Post
    i think a better analagy for voting A or B is this

    Our monthly scores are like Football Quarter time or Basketball or any other sport played in Quarters

    We have more than 4 Quarters obviosuyl , probalby more liek 20 Sections

    But in football it is the fina lscore that matters not who won each of the quarters.

    scrores could be.

    10-0 first qtr Team A win Qtr 10 to nil
    14-6 2nd qtr Team B win Qtr 6 to 4
    19-13 3rd qtr Team B win Qtr 7 to 5
    24-22 final score team B win Qtr 9 to 5

    in your analagy you would prefer TEAM B win for winning 3 of the 4 Qtrs
    But i nrelaity Team A wins for the Greater combined score.

    Hoep this helps people see that soemtimes the total score is used..
    Hmmm replace team A with the Philadelphia Eagles and I totally get it.

    Leave a comment:


  • Korea (DoC)
    replied
    I am so surprised that not a single trade has occured.

    This is already opening a big gap to the lower civs who need to trade to survive.

    Leave a comment:


  • Rasputin
    replied
    My only thought on your rating scale for current game Robert, is that 4 should not be the "Norm"

    Everyone should rate on a scale of 1 - 7 for each section.

    If the person you rating isoutstanding vote 7 and work back from there to lower performing and NON MET tribes. Any non met tribe or tribe that has not been seen to be involved in diplomacy or war etc should gt a 1 not a 4

    but that jsut my Opinion.

    Leave a comment:


  • Rasputin
    replied
    i think a better analagy for voting A or B is this

    Our monthly scores are like Football Quarter time or Basketball or any other sport played in Quarters

    We have more than 4 Quarters obviosuyl , probalby more liek 20 Sections

    But in football it is the fina lscore that matters not who won each of the quarters.

    scrores could be.

    10-0 first qtr Team A win Qtr 10 to nil
    14-6 2nd qtr Team B win Qtr 6 to 4
    19-13 3rd qtr Team B win Qtr 7 to 5
    24-22 final score team B win Qtr 9 to 5

    in your analagy you would prefer TEAM B win for winning 3 of the 4 Qtrs
    But i nrelaity Team A wins for the Greater combined score.

    Hoep this helps people see that soemtimes the total score is used..

    Leave a comment:


  • mzprox
    replied
    In my interpretation:
    (lets assume only one category for this example)
    A, : at the end you sum every monthly score and the winner is the one with the most points

    B, : you make a rating in every month then sum those ratings, winner is the one who get the most overall rating.

    I dont see what difference does it make, but B seems better.

    Leave a comment:


  • St Jon
    replied
    I now understand, a bit anyway, better. Each month is treated as though it was alone and in effect you get just a sum of 1-15pis per month as the total winner?

    Am I right in this interpretation? If I am then I can well see the logic of it all but all your weirdo algebra just knocked me sideways.

    Leave a comment:


  • Orb (DoC)
    replied
    So lost my head is spinning. Please no more math I can't take this type of torcher.

    Leave a comment:


  • Robert
    replied
    Rasputin: the current voting system is pure average.
    This proposed system is not more or less complex. Please don't stick to it only for reaons of "let's keep it like it is"
    I just realised that I made a mistake when I designed it.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X