Nobody's gonna be rewriting history through CivIV...
So do I understand correctly that many seem to think that adding more playable female leaders would somehow detract from the game? I mean is it really going to hamper your gameplay if someone wants to play Joan of Arc?
I don't understand why so many seem to have a problem with something like this...
EDIT: The only problem I can foresee as to how gameplay might be affected by adding many more leaders (female or not) is how each leader incorporates specific traits that influence game strategy. Coming up with these traits might be rather complicated.
So do I understand correctly that many seem to think that adding more playable female leaders would somehow detract from the game? I mean is it really going to hamper your gameplay if someone wants to play Joan of Arc?
I don't understand why so many seem to have a problem with something like this...
EDIT: The only problem I can foresee as to how gameplay might be affected by adding many more leaders (female or not) is how each leader incorporates specific traits that influence game strategy. Coming up with these traits might be rather complicated.
Comment