The Missing Civ

[Aro]

Originally posted by Locutus
Why wait 40 years? There's a fair share of civvers who've passed the 50 on this site already, and a number of 60+ people too

He's right. I'm still here!

Go Vikings!!!

[Alex]

Aro!! Long time no see. Good to know you're still civin'.

[Alexander I]

Originally posted by Alex
Aro!! Long time no see. Good to know you're still civin'.

Can't live w/o civ.

[Aro]

Yep, I'm still civin'. And a proud Apolytonian!
What's up, folks?

[Nikolai]

Well, for one we newly found a lost civ.

[Alexander I]

Originally posted by Nikolai
Well, for one we newly found a lost civ.

Huzzah!

[mhkhosravi]

Greeks MUST be in cIV, cIV without greeks ?!?!?! Athen is always my target in wars
in addition to Egypt, african civ must be included too, one of intersting features is to have deal with various faces and civs offcourse.
I think maybe having Civs to be seperated in many other civs during the game is better, for example , the game starts with persia but after few thousand years, because of some reasons , it seperates to Azerbayjan,Armenia,Georgia,Torkmanistan,Ghazaghist an, Uzbekistan,Tajikestan,Afghanistan,United Arab Emirates,Bahrain,Pakistan,... and then the leader only leads the main empire, for example Iran. hm?

[Alexander I]

Originally posted by mhkhosravi
Greeks MUST be in cIV, cIV without greeks ?!?!?! Athen is always my target in wars
in addition to Egypt, african civ must be included too, one of intersting features is to have deal with various faces and civs offcourse.
I think maybe having Civs to be seperated in many other civs during the game is better, for example , the game starts with persia but after few thousand years, because of some reasons , it seperates to Azerbayjan,Armenia,Georgia,Torkmanistan,Ghazaghist an, Uzbekistan,Tajikestan,Afghanistan,United Arab Emirates,Bahrain,Pakistan,... and then the leader only leads the main empire, for example Iran. hm?

Greeks are definitely in, but I don't know about your civ-splitting idea.

[Jon Shafer]

Originally posted by Aro
Yep, I'm still civin'. And a proud Apolytonian!
What's up, folks?

Welcome back Aro, nice to see you're still around.

[Nikolai]

Originally posted by Alexander01
Greeks are definitely in, but I don't know about your civ-splitting idea.

It would be a good idea for a civ-like, much extended game, but not suitable for the scope of civ really.

[GeoModder]

Perhaps an idea for Humanitas?

[Vince278]

Originally posted by mhkhosravi
Greeks MUST be in cIV, cIV without greeks ?!?!?! Athen is always my target in wars

Yet another good reason to include Greece.

[Nikolai]

Originally posted by GeoModder
Perhaps an idea for Humanitas?

Perhaps. Anyway, Paradox's games is a good example on how it can be done.

[mhkhosravi]

Originally posted by GeoModder
Perhaps an idea for Humanitas?

I attacked athens to present them democracy
seriously I agree with humanities, and perhaps a UN that have some power to help poor civs and attack invaders must be included.
may be UN can use the military of the nation that builds it.

I think it is needed.
some times when I forget to build more armies, and I am scientifically and industrially advanced, another civ (Greece ) attacks me and destroys many of my cities. I think in new ages UN must have some power to stop these treats. or more bad effects on other countries that have some trades and good relations with me.(even without Mutual Protection Pack)

[Alexander I]

So which civ does everyone think will be dropped from the game?

Babylon or the Incas? I personally am hoping that the Incas are, as Babylon is the only represent of Mesopotamia, and the contributions of the Mesopotamian world to civilization are myriad.