Base damage doesn't matter so much. The difference in average damage between a 1d4 kukri and a 1d8 longsword is just 2 points, or 4 points on a critical. Maxed out for criticals (Imp. Crit. and Keen, no WM levels), the kukri gets a critical on rolls of 12-20 (40% of the time) and the longsword gets a critical on rolls of 15-20 (25% of the time). With no other bonuses, the kukri does an average of 2.8 damage on every hit, and the longsword does an average of 5 damage on every hit. But once you've got a +6 bonus to damage, the kukri does an average of 11.2 damage per hit (at full STR bonus) and the longsword does an average of 12.5, and the damage gap continues to decrease as the damage bonus increases.
But on top of that, the kukri is a Tiny weapon, which means that even Small characters can dual-wield a pair of kukris without losing attack bonuses from holding a light weapon in the off-hand. It also means that any feats they take that apply to a single weapon type (like the Weapon Focus, Weapon Specialization, and Improved Critical feat paths and the WM favoured weapon) are applied to both weapons.
All that said, there are better weapon choices if you're a Medium or larger creature.
SP
But on top of that, the kukri is a Tiny weapon, which means that even Small characters can dual-wield a pair of kukris without losing attack bonuses from holding a light weapon in the off-hand. It also means that any feats they take that apply to a single weapon type (like the Weapon Focus, Weapon Specialization, and Improved Critical feat paths and the WM favoured weapon) are applied to both weapons.
All that said, there are better weapon choices if you're a Medium or larger creature.
SP
Comment