214 to ya
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Mounties vs Mongrels 5-6-2005
Collapse
X
-
Re: Mounties vs Mongrels 5-6-2005
Originally posted by Grandpa Troll
Well, a lot can be said for the new founding of the North Americans!
A treaty between two familes headed by Canadian Cuiach [Canada] and Cousin Cuiach [America]
There was to be a celebration and well that is until words reached the very keen ears from those packs of Mongrel Dawgs headed by Gramps Canute of the Vikings and Genghis Gramps of the Mongolians
Indeed we will have to see how they pan out in various chosen paths!
The way it has been set by the Lords of Apolytonia are as follows:
Gigantic Map
Doughnut World
Bloodlust ON
Pollution Off
50% on wet/dry
50% on warm/cold
2 clicks from far left on Oceans/Land
2 clicks from far left on Islands/Continent
All Uniform
Many Goods
2 civs each
I would suggest we enjoy the spoils of war from ruins
I would ask we build no wonders
From a Battle weary Warrior to a Gentlemen I would ask no nukes
Now
this one is up to you
do you feel it is ok to pillage or even pirate?
your choice I will be contented either way
Enjoy as I am going to
Gramps
Ihave Bloodlust on
does this mean we cant build space victory
Let me know
we could allways just start a fresh battle game if so
or a fresh Space game if so
GrampsHi, I'm RAH and I'm a Benaholic.-rah
Comment
-
220 back atcha.
Sorry, hadn't looked here in awhile. Responding to an old post by this time:
We can certainly play bloodlust. I wasn't sure, and didn't have the intelligence to go back and check the original posts for this match. I realize you have said space race in an email to me, but if you have been building for and expecting bloodlust, then I don't want to change the rules mid-game. I do think we discussed some kind of limit(s) on warfare...what do you think is right/fair at this juncture?
Cuaich the confusing
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cuaich
220 back atcha.
Sorry, hadn't looked here in awhile. Responding to an old post by this time:
We can certainly play bloodlust. I wasn't sure, and didn't have the intelligence to go back and check the original posts for this match. I realize you have said space race in an email to me, but if you have been building for and expecting bloodlust, then I don't want to change the rules mid-game. I do think we discussed some kind of limit(s) on warfare...what do you think is right/fair at this juncture?
Cuaich the confusing
I am not geared for war now would take a bit to do such
We can do anything you like, I just meant earlier in game we could be peaceable not necessarily having to go to war.
Im da confuzin one, mah baaaadddd
Let me know which way you would like to proceed
I just enjoy playing and your an excellent competitor
Gramps
P S
Im at work and will play turn when I return home
Hi, I'm RAH and I'm a Benaholic.-rah
Comment
-
221 to you.
I am also not geared for war, so it sounds like we are on equal ground. That is good...no unfair advantage either way through miscommunication. I will agree to any "end game", but would be curious to see how a "no war game" plays out...I've never played a game without at least some combat. Your call though...let me know.
And best of luck!!
Comment
Comment