Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Mounties vs Mongrels 5-6-2005

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 214 to ya
    Hi, I'm RAH and I'm a Benaholic.-rah

    Comment


    • I realized I haven't posted here in awhile...so, how you doin'??

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Cuaich
        I realized I haven't posted here in awhile...so, how you doin'??
        Good, hope you are..

        Did you get 214?

        Looking forward

        Gramps
        Hi, I'm RAH and I'm a Benaholic.-rah

        Comment


        • Re: Mounties vs Mongrels 5-6-2005

          Originally posted by Grandpa Troll
          Well, a lot can be said for the new founding of the North Americans!

          A treaty between two familes headed by Canadian Cuiach [Canada] and Cousin Cuiach [America]

          There was to be a celebration and well that is until words reached the very keen ears from those packs of Mongrel Dawgs headed by Gramps Canute of the Vikings and Genghis Gramps of the Mongolians

          Indeed we will have to see how they pan out in various chosen paths!

          The way it has been set by the Lords of Apolytonia are as follows:

          Gigantic Map

          Doughnut World

          Bloodlust ON

          Pollution Off

          50% on wet/dry

          50% on warm/cold

          2 clicks from far left on Oceans/Land

          2 clicks from far left on Islands/Continent

          All Uniform

          Many Goods

          2 civs each

          I would suggest we enjoy the spoils of war from ruins

          I would ask we build no wonders


          From a Battle weary Warrior to a Gentlemen I would ask no nukes

          Now

          this one is up to you

          do you feel it is ok to pillage or even pirate?

          your choice I will be contented either way

          Enjoy as I am going to

          Gramps
          Cuiach

          Ihave Bloodlust on

          does this mean we cant build space victory



          Let me know
          we could allways just start a fresh battle game if so

          or a fresh Space game if so

          Gramps
          Hi, I'm RAH and I'm a Benaholic.-rah

          Comment


          • 215 back
            Hi, I'm RAH and I'm a Benaholic.-rah

            Comment


            • 216 back at ya
              Hi, I'm RAH and I'm a Benaholic.-rah

              Comment


              • 217 back at ya
                Hi, I'm RAH and I'm a Benaholic.-rah

                Comment


                • 218

                  hope your doing well
                  Hi, I'm RAH and I'm a Benaholic.-rah

                  Comment


                  • 219 back
                    Hi, I'm RAH and I'm a Benaholic.-rah

                    Comment


                    • 220 back atcha.

                      Sorry, hadn't looked here in awhile. Responding to an old post by this time:

                      We can certainly play bloodlust. I wasn't sure, and didn't have the intelligence to go back and check the original posts for this match. I realize you have said space race in an email to me, but if you have been building for and expecting bloodlust, then I don't want to change the rules mid-game. I do think we discussed some kind of limit(s) on warfare...what do you think is right/fair at this juncture?

                      Cuaich the confusing

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by Cuaich
                        220 back atcha.

                        Sorry, hadn't looked here in awhile. Responding to an old post by this time:

                        We can certainly play bloodlust. I wasn't sure, and didn't have the intelligence to go back and check the original posts for this match. I realize you have said space race in an email to me, but if you have been building for and expecting bloodlust, then I don't want to change the rules mid-game. I do think we discussed some kind of limit(s) on warfare...what do you think is right/fair at this juncture?

                        Cuaich the confusing
                        I kinda meant early on in game we didnt have to go fighting so early

                        I am not geared for war now would take a bit to do such

                        We can do anything you like, I just meant earlier in game we could be peaceable not necessarily having to go to war.

                        Im da confuzin one, mah baaaadddd

                        Let me know which way you would like to proceed

                        I just enjoy playing and your an excellent competitor

                        Gramps

                        P S

                        Im at work and will play turn when I return home

                        Hi, I'm RAH and I'm a Benaholic.-rah

                        Comment


                        • and 220 back
                          Hi, I'm RAH and I'm a Benaholic.-rah

                          Comment


                          • 221 to you.

                            I am also not geared for war, so it sounds like we are on equal ground. That is good...no unfair advantage either way through miscommunication. I will agree to any "end game", but would be curious to see how a "no war game" plays out...I've never played a game without at least some combat. Your call though...let me know.

                            And best of luck!!

                            Comment


                            • 221 back

                              How about we go to a certain turn and then go to war?
                              or when game ends highest score?(Combined team)

                              We could go that way?

                              Gramps
                              Hi, I'm RAH and I'm a Benaholic.-rah

                              Comment


                              • 222 back
                                Hi, I'm RAH and I'm a Benaholic.-rah

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X