Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Technology System E-Mail Archive

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Technology System E-Mail Archive

    Previous Technology Thread

    This thread is for archival and reference purposes only. For the past couple months, LJG and I have been hashing out the technology system via e-mail. These discussions have been useful for my reference, and I have decided to post them for the following reasons:

    1) It is not possible to search the e-mails by keyword in the current storage form. There are so many e-mails that I often can't find a discussion I need. Posting these allows me to easily search through them.

    2) These e-mails could be useful for anyone who wants to know why the tech model is in its current form. LGJ and I have already discussed and debated many topics, and rather than go over them again I would like to be able to point people to a reference so they can see the discussions.

    3) The ITS at our school is not the world's most reliable. I would hate to lose all of this, for reasons mentioned above. I will be graduating this year anyway, at which time the account will be purged.

    The archive will be sorted in chronological order, starting with the oldest e-mail. Each post will be the mail from one person. E-mails that I sent will be have the dark background, and LJG's e-mails will have the light background. To keep the color consistent, I will often have to put multiple e-mails in one post. When I do this, the different e-mails will be seperated by dashes with New Mail inside. Note that in normal e-mail we often use dashes to quote each other.
    [This message has been edited by Richard Bruns (edited February 01, 2000).]
    [This message has been edited by Richard Bruns (edited February 27, 2000).]

  • #2
    I have offered to help with the Clash project, and after some communication with Mark Everson he asked me to work on military technology. He suggested that I get the current technology list from you so I could connect specific military technologies to the tree. Could you send me that, as well as any other details you think would be helpful for this task?
    I have posted a technology proposal on the Apolyton forum. It is meant to complement what you already have. Could you look over that and critique it? Please keep in mind that I don't know exactly what you are currently doing with tech, as all of my information comes from the forums and the Clash webpage.
    Thank you.

    Comment


    • #3
      I'll pron not impliment any changes till i hear from u again.

      Comment


      • #4
        I will get to work adding military techs. I will also work on filling up the effects column. Also, If I see some change to something you already have that I think would be helpful, I will give a recommendation for you to consider.
        All of this should take a few weeks. For now, I will put my suggestions in words only. Actual numbers will have to be input by someone more knowledeable about the specific model, and in any case will have to be playtested to insure game balance.
        I will send you the list with changes when I am done. Can your computer read MS Word formatted documents? Wordperfect in not on the school network.
        --- New Mail ---
        Here are some examples from the tech tree.

        Pesticides: Farm output increases by some percentage. The player is partially or fully immune to a Locust Swarm natural disaster, depending on province infrastructure. Pollution increases and there is now a chance for an Algae Bloom natural disaster.
        (I don't know if these disasters exist in the game, but I think they should.)

        Radio: Ship navigation improves. Naval groups fight at increased effectiveness. Culture becomes more homogenized across any section of your civ that is served by a power grid. (The dominant cultural agent in the most advanced province is considered to be in charge of programming.) Also, it becomes easier for your government to spread propaganda.

        If this kind of thing is okay, I will fill the tech tree Effects column.


        [This message has been edited by Richard Bruns (edited February 01, 2000).]
        [This message has been edited by Richard Bruns (edited February 01, 2000).]

        Comment


        • #5
          > I will send you the list with changes when I am done. Can your
          computer

          Ok that's fine. A few weeks then. I'll prob be inputing the numbers then
          since i'm the head hancho of techs and i know about what i want them to be.

          > read MS Word formatted documents? Wordperfect in not on the school
          network.

          Shouldn't be. I'll just haveto convert it.

          Comment


          • #6
            I am working through the tree. I am currently concentrating on general framework issues, like the template tech idea I posted. Overall you have a great tech tree, but I have a few concerns:

            Clinic: What exactly is this?

            Acupuncture
            Discovery of Chi
            Dualism
            Harmony with Self
            Harmony with Nature
            Non-Interference
            Tai-Chi
            Theory of Change
            Way of Enligntenment
            I have looked over the tree and none of these seem to do anything major other than Clinic. Why would the player want to research them? Also, they show a definite preference for Eastern thought. I can work up a Template proposal that includes both these and the ideas from other cultures if I get more information from you about what you wanted to do with these.

            Way of the Blade
            Martial Arts
            Ninjitsu
            Curballi
            Katana
            Again, Culture specific techs. It should be fairly easy to make these Template techs.

            Sentient Electronic Life.
            This should have MAJOR consequences. At the very least a new cultural agant should be created. There should also be a signifigant chance of the AI rising up against you. I personally don't think this tech should be included, but I will still write the effects list.

            Genetic Engineering
            I think this one should become a Basic Technology like synthetics. It is an entire field of study, not just one thing. When it reaches certain percentages, new techs become available.

            Network
            I also recommend making it a basic tech. At a certain percentage it becomes World Wide Network.

            Architecture
            Archway
            Column
            Concrete
            I think this is getting a bit too specific. Can we wrap them all into an Architecture basic tech?

            Fine Arts: You don't have it and no one on the Clash team seems to be very knowledgeable about it. Can we make it a basic tech and have it be a soft prerequisite for some things?

            I don't mean to complain or change everything. These are just suggestions for some minor issues. However, I really think that the Template technology idea is worth pursuing. I also think that it would help to have less specific techs and more basic techs that rise in percentage. Your basic tech system is a very good idea, and I think that it can be expanded to cover many more topics.
            My view is that any process or skill like Architecture should be a continnum rather than a discrete unit. I will make a complete and detailed proposal whenever I have enough time to really work. It will not change your tech tree; it would simply do things like turn Telegraph, Telephone, and Modem into the basic tech Wire Communication. Instead of having one lead to another in huge steps, Telephone would be Wire Communication 20% while Modem is Wire Communication 50%. In between, the technology is steadily increasing. The earliest modem is 50%, a 28.8 Kbps is 80%, and a cable or satellite modem is 95%. The Network tech would require Wire Communication 60%, and when it was invented it too would become a basic tech.

            The same thing can be done for Radio and other Wireless Communication.

            Now that I have considered it more, my system really isn't a change. It simply allows RP's to be implemented instantly in the form of increased percentages, while the current system saves them up and spends them all at once.

            Sorry I'm not working faster; I currently have three major school projects and three exams to study for.

            I will have a complete list of effects like the Pesticide and Radio ones before Christmas.

            Comment


            • #7
              > I am working through the tree. I am currently concentrating on
              general
              > framework issues, like the template tech idea I posted. Overall you have
              a
              > great tech tree, but I have a few concerns:
              >
              > Clinic: What exactly is this?

              Well its basically the idea of having a place to go to see a healer or
              doctor and where he can do basic research and stuff. Also 2 or more healers
              would prob be in this area. b4 this healers/medicine men would travel around
              or have no perm set of residence.

              > Acupuncture
              > Discovery of Chi
              > Dualism
              > Harmony with Self
              > Harmony with Nature
              > Non-Interference
              > Tai-Chi
              > Theory of Change
              > Way of Enligntenment
              > I have looked over the tree and none of these seem to do anything
              major
              > other than Clinic. Why would the player want to research them? Also,
              they

              I tend to disagree on a few and will tell which a little futher down.

              > show a definite preference for Eastern thought. I can work up a Template
              > proposal that includes both these and the ideas from other cultures if I
              get
              > more information from you about what you wanted to do with these.

              Yes well a lot of techs also have western slant to them too i can even name
              a few offhand:
              knighthood, castles, cavalry, monotheism, religious infrastucture.

              Anyway Tai-Chi, harmony with self/nature and way of enlightenment do for
              sure as well as prob dualism and discovery of chi because these all
              represent the religous thought of those places which tend to not be
              montheistic (that is a western thought)

              > Way of the Blade
              > Martial Arts
              > Ninjitsu
              > Curballi
              > Katana
              > Again, Culture specific techs. It should be fairly easy to make these
              > Template techs.

              True, martial arts was also used in the primitve form called wresting in the
              west. Ninjitsu is definatly orential related but if u can find a
              non-specific one for this that's fine otherwise i still think we should have
              it. Curballi is defin a western type armor. I'm not too fam with the names
              of the armor in the east and the only reason i have curballi is because it
              is an improv over leather armor, but not as good as mail/plate armor...kinda
              a transition. I put katana in because it rep the best sword ever made. This
              really can't be argued because of the way they made it by folding the metal
              over & over in almost atom-think layers to make it stonger. The technique
              was never used in europe and is lost today, but only another katana can
              break a katana (kina like only a dimond can scratch a diamond).

              > Sentient Electronic Life.
              > This should have MAJOR consequences. At the very least a new cultural
              > agant should be created. There should also be a signifigant chance of the
              > AI rising up against you. I personally don't think this tech should be
              > included, but I will still write the effects list.

              I think so. Even today you'd be surprised at how advanced things are
              getting. This obviouslly is one of the "few" future techs i wanted in
              there. and your right about it having signifigant impact.Idon't know about
              the uprising though. Here me out:
              First off this was in a manga i have called "Ghost in the Shell", the idea
              atleast. Athough put in a comical way it is pretty much true. We would
              before the uprising be maintaining the robots, giving them repairs, keeping
              them well maintained, giving them what they need for free (atleast to them).
              Now when they uprise they'd have to start doing it themselves and if they
              subjigated us we'd still be doing it so what do they have to gain? Well in
              the manga all that ended up happening was they wanted to be treated kinder
              (say please and thank u basically).

              > Genetic Engineering
              > I think this one should become a Basic Technology like synthetics. It
              > is an entire field of study, not just one thing. When it reaches certain
              > percentages, new techs become available.

              Okay i'm up for that...of course u know the idea of basic techs is to help
              elim some non-basic techs and that's why were using them or we'd have too
              many.

              > Network
              > I also recommend making it a basic tech. At a certain percentage it
              > becomes World Wide Network.

              Maybe. to both. First off networks really haven't changed much. The
              technology has made them faster, but that would be handled in computers and
              as far as the WWN goes well that should also have other requirements such as
              international law (soft prereq), and other nations would haveto have similar
              levels of network then so i'm not too sure.

              > Architecture
              > Archway
              > Column
              > Concrete
              > I think this is getting a bit too specific. Can we wrap them all into
              > an Architecture basic tech?

              Well first off architecture should have been dropped from normal techs.
              maybe for archway and collum, but not concrete since it was a major
              advancement.

              > Fine Arts: You don't have it and no one on the Clash team seems to be
              very
              > knowledgeable about it. Can we make it a basic tech and have it be a soft
              > prerequisite for some things?

              I was working on some, but the prob is some aren't really tech related.
              here's what i have and i don't really want these grouped into a "fine arts"
              tech. Also i'd like some help coming up with a few specific techs related
              to these, however, i don'twant these to be era specific unless it requires a
              certain tech (animation requires film FE) This is the styles were brought
              on by people, not tech based ness and cultural rates at which were
              "advanced" (for lack of better word) varied very very widely.

              Music - includes instruments, singing, cultural changes, from stuff like
              bards and minstels to religous music to syphonies.
              Artwork - drawing, painting, scupting, architecture, etc
              Dancing - maybe put with music, but i don't know...
              Gaming - would include stuff from chess to uno and also sports (cuz they're
              games)
              Lierature - Books, poems, stories, etc. bards to novelist.

              That's all i can think of off hand and if u have any ideas dont hesitate to
              say.

              > I don't mean to complain or change everything. These are just
              > suggestions for some minor issues. However, I really think that the
              > Template technology idea is worth pursuing. I also think that it would
              help
              > to have less specific techs and more basic techs that rise in percentage.
              > Your basic tech system is a very good idea, and I think that it can be
              > expanded to cover many more topics.
              > My view is that any process or skill like Architecture should be a
              > continnum rather than a discrete unit. I will make a complete and
              detailed
              > proposal whenever I have enough time to really work. It will not change
              > your tech tree; it would simply do things like turn Telegraph, Telephone,
              > and Modem into the basic tech Wire Communication. Instead of having one
              > lead to another in huge steps, Telephone would be Wire Communication 20%
              > while Modem is Wire Communication 50%. In between, the technology is
              > steadily increasing. The earliest modem is 50%, a 28.8 Kbps is 80%, and a
              > cable or satellite modem is 95%. The Network tech would require Wire
              > Communication 60%, and when it was invented it too would become a basic
              > tech.
              >
              > The same thing can be done for Radio and other Wireless Communication.
              >
              > Now that I have considered it more, my system really isn't a change.
              It
              > simply allows RP's to be implemented instantly in the form of increased
              > percentages, while the current system saves them up and spends them all at
              > once.
              >
              > Sorry I'm not working faster; I currently have three major school projects
              > and three exams to study for.
              >
              > I will have a complete list of effects like the Pesticide and Radio ones
              > before Christmas.
              >
              Okay timewise is fine. Mainly as far as the concept is concerned i think
              there should be a lot more if its done right, but a few major ones that
              really changed (or will change) society should have to be researched sep.

              Comment


              • #8
                Yes well a lot of techs also have western slant to them too i can even name
                a few offhand:
                knighthood, castles, cavalry, monotheism, religious infrastucture.
                ----
                I did have knighthood marked but forgot to comment on it. It seems that knighthood/ninjitsu are analogous and would be good candidates for a template tech. I know that there were important differences, but at the civ level of abstraction they have the same result (knight/ninja).

                I thought most advanced societies had castles of some sort and I know that cavalry was used by almost everyone. Middle Eastern societies were the first to use it and the West just copied the idea. A Parthian cataphract is about the same thing as a western knight, and the cataphract was developed much earlier.

                I think that the best way to deal with religion is to make it a basic tech and simply rise in percentage. A certain percentage is a prerequisite for various things. That way we are not implying that one belief is more advanced or 'better' than another.
                ----
                Anyway Tai-Chi, harmony with self/nature and way of enlightenment do for
                sure as well as prob dualism and discovery of chi because these all
                represent the religous thought of those places which tend to not be
                montheistic (that is a western thought)
                ----
                But that does not change the fact that all of this does not do much at all. The only thing the player gets from these techs is ninjas; aside from that it is a massive dead end. By including all of these things, you will actually make players see them as worthless. I know they are not, but in your tech tree they lead nowhere! I might be missing something, but none of these are in the prerequisite list for anything except clinic, ninja, and each other.
                ----
                True, martial arts was also used in the primitve form called wresting in the
                west. Ninjitsu is definatly orential related but if u can find a
                non-specific one for this that's fine otherwise i still think we should have
                it.
                ----
                Perhaps I have not explained myself clearly enough. I do not want to put a dull cardboard tech in front of the player. The non-specific tech is simply a programming description. If the player is playing an eastern culture that player will see 'ninjitsu' and nothing else. If that player is playing a western culture, that player will see 'knighthood' and nothing else. But at the programming level, they are the same thing. If each of these is given a seperate slot on the tech tree, then the tech tree will be larger and needlessly more complex. The player might be forced to research both of them. Because they do the same thing as far as he player is concerned, they should be the same thing. But they should be given a different 'flavor' for different societies.
                ----
                Curballi is defin a western type armor. I'm not too fam with the names
                of the armor in the east and the only reason i have curballi is because it
                is an improv over leather armor, but not as good as mail/plate armor...kinda
                a transition.
                ----
                As someone who really studies military history I can tell you that this difference in armor type means very little to the outcome of battles. It is true that one person in a curballi will probably defeat one person in basic leather. But military victories are rarely determined by such things. Tactics, organization, and logistics all play a far bigger role. Technology in the military only makes a signigigant difference when it allows an army to do something really new. Once again, I would recommend that such fine differences be incorporated into an 'armor' basic tech and not take up space on the tree.
                ----
                I put katana in because it rep the best sword ever made.
                ----
                I know that the katana is a very impressive weapon that is able to slice a machine gun in half, but I don't think it should get a special place in the tech tree for the following reasons:
                1. The method of production was very expensive and time consuming. They could only be made for the wealthy. It would be almost impossible to equip an entire Clash sized army with this weapon.
                2. Even if you did have an entire army equipped with the best swords ever made, your army would not be much more effective. A well organized and well led fighting force with poor weapons could easily defeat your army if your army was not as skilled. This is ignoring the fact that they could equip an army ten times the size of yours for the amount of production you spent on the katanas.

                However, you are right about putting in things like the katana. It would add detail and richness ot the game. I would recommend making a 'hand to hand weapons' basic tech and have katanas be about 110% on that scale.
                ----
                I think so. Even today you'd be surprised at how advanced things are
                getting.
                ----
                Computers are doing some amazing things, but the most advanced robots have less basic brainpower than cockroaches. The difference is that we program them to do something useful. But they cannot really go beyond their programming. The human brain has a neural network architecture that engineers cannot begin to duplicate. I recommend that we stop at Artificial Intellegence that is not really self aware.
                ----
                ...of course u know the idea of basic techs is to help
                elim some non-basic techs and that's why were using them or we'd have too
                many.
                ----
                That is exactly my point. I think that most of the engineering technologies on the tech tree could be incorporated into 'basic' techs. For example, is it really necessary to give Breeding, Cellular Structure, Cloning, and Genetic Engineering their own slots? Just say that at Biology 5% you discover breeding, at 40% you discover cell structure, at 80% you discover cloning, and at 95% you learn to alter genes.

                I don't know what you meant to do by putting Cloning after Genetic Engineering, but that were cloning frogs and plants in the 50's, long before they learned to alter genetic code.
                ----
                other nations would haveto have similar
                levels of network then so i'm not too sure.
                ----
                If I wanted to, I could send data from my school's T-something line to a 600 BPS modem in an underdeveloped country.
                ----
                but not concrete since it was a major advancement.
                ----
                You are getting a bit too specific. The only use of concrete is that it allows you to build better things. This should be modeled by a rise in the Architecture tech.
                ----

                Music - includes instruments, singing, cultural changes, from stuff like
                bards and minstels to religous music to syphonies.
                Artwork - drawing, painting, scupting, architecture, etc
                Dancing - maybe put with music, but i don't know...
                Gaming - would include stuff from chess to uno and also sports (cuz they're
                games)
                Lierature - Books, poems, stories, etc. bards to novelist.

                That's all i can think of off hand and if u have any ideas dont hesitate to
                say.
                ----
                Sounds good; I didn't know you were working on it.
                ----
                but a few major ones that really changed (or will change) society should have to be researched sep.
                ----
                Of course, new things develop. But as soon as they develop that start to grow and improve. We have been cloning things since the 50's, but it was simple stuff and they are constantly improving it. The same thing is true of Planes. They developed as a revolutionary idea, but they had to improve it for years.

                As I imagine it, new technologies are invented by smart people in our society. After they have the idea, you research to rise the percentage. For example, the Wright Brothers give you Planes 1%. You cannot build an airfleet the next turn, however. You need to build up the level to the proper amount by supporting research. This research rate is of course influenced by other techs like Engineering. A simple WW1 fighter would require Planes 10% and a bomber would need Planes 15%. After that, every new plane you make has power and range based on your Planes level. I know that you already have an Air Transportation basic tech; I am recommending making it include all airplane related things.

                This should have several benefits. A player that did not care much about technology would not have to get too involved. Thay simply support research and let the numbers grow. A player that was interested in technology could ask for more detail. It would be possible to give descriptions for every 5% change in the basic tech. This technophile would get lots of messages like, "We have discovered Concrete...Our Architecture level has risen 20%." A player that didn't want such details could simply choose to turn this message off.

                I will make a chart that includes all of the current techs as percentages on basic technologies or as standalone techs. Then we can discuss it in the forums. I promise that I will really work on this in detail as soon as my many final projects have been completed. I have a very rigorous school curriculum. I have been working on and studying Clash stuff, but this is a big task as I will try to have technology effects integrated into every area of the game.

                PS How will Clash end? I never saw any consensus on this. Will it simply stop at a certain date, or is there some endgame like in civ games? Also, is the 1000 BC starting set in stone? I would like to start much earlier, about 6000 BC. The turns would be something reasonable like 20 years and the attacking (non-garrison) armies would be treated like airplanes.

                PPS Mark, I just got your e-mail. I think this addresses your concerns about simplicity. A player could get a detailed blow-by-blow account of technical progress if he or she so desired. But others wouldn't be bothered by the excess details. Remember, some people don't really care about tech and are turned off by huge trees. Your idea seems good, but I would recommend clearly marking the starting place of the new tech. That way a player knows that they have only researched a little electronics and do not know 70% of the total sum of electronics knowledge.
                You are right that players choose the tech ending point. I recommend three levels:
                Modern: Current technology
                Near Future: Predictable technologies that are currently being researched. The tech tree ends about 50 years in the future. I think I could do this one well.
                Far Future: All the sci-fi stuff like sentient computers, psionic powers, cyborgs, cloaking devices, anything that LGJ wants to put in there

                If you think this should be posted go ahead. I wanted to wait until I had a complete and more coherent proposal.

                Comment


                • #9
                  > Yes well a lot of techs also have western slant to them too i can even
                  name
                  > a few offhand:
                  > knighthood, castles, cavalry, monotheism, religious infrastucture.
                  > ----
                  > I did have knighthood marked but forgot to comment on it. It seems that
                  > knighthood/ninjitsu are analogous and would be good candidates for a
                  > template tech. I know that there were important differences, but at the
                  civ
                  > level of abstraction they have the same result (knight/ninja).
                  >
                  Actually no...its closer to say knight/samari....ninjas were usually pages,
                  diplomats and assasins...ninjitsu is a form of martial arts and weapon
                  training.

                  > I thought most advanced societies had castles of some sort and I know that
                  > cavalry was used by almost everyone. Middle Eastern societies were the
                  > first to use it and the West just copied the idea. A Parthian cataphract
                  is
                  > about the same thing as a western knight, and the cataphract was developed
                  > much earlier.

                  I guess now that i think about the cavalry ur right. but the castles were
                  nothing like european ones. Sure they had walls and has ways to defend
                  against them, but they weren't really fortresses like many of the castles of
                  europe were (until later). Nor did any of them have thick walls or much of
                  the traps that were like those of the european ones. They did have secret
                  rooms and such but no where near ad advanced (artwise maybe more so but for
                  practicality not really, but the practicallity is a realitve trerm). Lets
                  just say that a castle of european make would stand a seige in orient while
                  it wasn't true the other way around (except maybe japan but that's for
                  another reason).

                  > I think that the best way to deal with religion is to make it a basic tech
                  > and simply rise in percentage. A certain percentage is a prerequisite for
                  > various things. That way we are not implying that one belief is more
                  > advanced or 'better' than another.

                  I do have it as a basic tech but there are some religions determined by
                  historians from accross the globe that are more advanced than others. The
                  older "nature worship" and "shamanistic" and "ancestral" religions are
                  considered by a majority of historians and scolars as less advanced.
                  Polytheistic religions like babylonian, egyptian and greece (most so) are
                  more advanced. After that is tends to diverge and many religions such as
                  shintoism which is "nature worship" basically is also quite advanced because
                  it incorperates other ideas from budhism and confuscianism. Basically i
                  think we should keep a few in as follows:
                  Nature Worship (this would include shamanism and non-shamanisic religions)
                  Polytheism (such as greece and hinduism for more advanced version)
                  Monotheism (if u don't know what this means....)
                  Path of Enlightenment (Budhism basically)
                  Elemental Worship/Belief (Earth Fire Water Wind for Europe and Fire Water
                  Wind/Lightning for East sometimes wood and nature also.This wouldn't ness be
                  religion but could be)
                  Harmony with Nature (Tasoism and most other oriental religions)

                  This is certainly a chop in the religious section, but i still think chi
                  should be in there, though u may us "ka" also (this too is oriental in
                  origin though)

                  > Anyway Tai-Chi, harmony with self/nature and way of enlightenment do for
                  > sure as well as prob dualism and discovery of chi because these all
                  > represent the religous thought of those places which tend to not be
                  > montheistic (that is a western thought)
                  > ----
                  > But that does not change the fact that all of this does not do much at
                  all.
                  > The only thing the player gets from these techs is ninjas; aside from that
                  > it is a massive dead end. By including all of these things, you will
                  > actually make players see them as worthless. I know they are not, but in
                  > your tech tree they lead nowhere! I might be missing something, but none
                  of
                  > these are in the prerequisite list for anything except clinic, ninja, and
                  > each other.

                  First off they also affect culture. They also do produce samari (hehe) but
                  many other stuff. I haven't gone through and put in the details as far as
                  improv/units go thats why it looks like it doesn't do anything. That was my
                  next step when u came and helped and i would appreciate it if u could help
                  in that area cuz if we take out those we haveto take out monotheism to keep
                  things non-biased and people would wonder what happens if all u can develope
                  is polytheistic religions.

                  > True, martial arts was also used in the primitve form called wresting in
                  the
                  > west. Ninjitsu is definatly orential related but if u can find a
                  > non-specific one for this that's fine otherwise i still think we should
                  have
                  > it.
                  > ----
                  > Perhaps I have not explained myself clearly enough. I do not want to put
                  a
                  > dull cardboard tech in front of the player. The non-specific tech is
                  simply
                  > a programming description. If the player is playing an eastern culture
                  that
                  > player will see 'ninjitsu' and nothing else. If that player is playing a

                  remember were not using "eastern" or "western" cultures. Each culture
                  developes its own methods based on the conditions placed upon them and how
                  the choose to respond to them (and the player also). When u start out u
                  won't choose whether ur chinese or german like in the other civ games.
                  Instead (i'm assuming from what mark says) that u'll choose certain
                  modifiers to start ur culture off with or it will be randomly chosen for
                  each as well as where ur placed. I'm not saying what u said can't be done i
                  just want u to understand what is considered culture by me and mark. If u
                  can come with a way that's fine.

                  > I put katana in because it rep the best sword ever made.
                  > ----
                  > I know that the katana is a very impressive weapon that is able to slice a
                  > machine gun in half, but I don't think it should get a special place in
                  the
                  > tech tree for the following reasons:
                  > 1. The method of production was very expensive and time consuming. They
                  > could only be made for the wealthy. It would be almost impossible to
                  equip
                  > an entire Clash sized army with this weapon.
                  > 2. Even if you did have an entire army equipped with the best swords ever
                  > made, your army would not be much more effective. A well organized and
                  well
                  > led fighting force with poor weapons could easily defeat your army if your
                  > army was not as skilled. This is ignoring the fact that they could equip
                  an
                  > army ten times the size of yours for the amount of production you spent on
                  > the katanas.
                  > However, you are right about putting in things like the katana. It would
                  > add detail and richness ot the game. I would recommend making a 'hand to
                  > hand weapons' basic tech and have katanas be about 110% on that scale.

                  Also in a skilled hands an army equipped with melee weapons could defeat and
                  army with machine guns and such. Ur right about it being hard to create
                  though. I totally agree. But there was atleast one instances during the
                  "old west" of samari defeating one of the best gunslingers ever in a dual
                  because he was also good in martial arts and jumped behind him and stabbed
                  him. Of course this is a one-on-one battle, but if they are skilled enough
                  it could be done with an entire armies.

                  > ----
                  > I think so. Even today you'd be surprised at how advanced things are
                  > getting.
                  > ----
                  > Computers are doing some amazing things, but the most advanced robots have
                  > less basic brainpower than cockroaches. The difference is that we program
                  > them to do something useful. But they cannot really go beyond their
                  > programming. The human brain has a neural network architecture that
                  > engineers cannot begin to duplicate. I recommend that we stop at
                  Artificial
                  > Intellegence that is not really self aware.

                  Um i suggest to read a book called "The End of Work" written by a renowned
                  scientist/economist. I can't think of his name because i borrowed it from
                  the library. Your right that today most computers are quite dumb and can
                  only do programs that we tell them to, however there is currently one
                  working prototype that does learn, not like an AI learns how u play a game
                  and changes strategies, but actually learns like as close to a human as
                  possible is (ie like a Vulcan from Star Trek would, using only logic). This
                  project was actually started several years ago and there working on another
                  prototype now.

                  > I don't know what you meant to do by putting Cloning after Genetic
                  > Engineering, but that were cloning frogs and plants in the 50's, long
                  before
                  > they learned to alter genetic code.

                  Well i really didn't...i think i just put that if u have genetic engineering
                  u can get better at cloning.

                  > other nations would haveto have similar
                  > levels of network then so i'm not too sure.
                  > ----
                  > If I wanted to, I could send data from my school's T-something line to a
                  600
                  > BPS modem in an underdeveloped country.

                  Now u could because businesses invested there...10 years ago if we wanted to
                  set up a WWN we couldn't have included many of them.

                  > Music - includes instruments, singing, cultural changes, from stuff like
                  > bards and minstels to religous music to syphonies.
                  > Artwork - drawing, painting, scupting, architecture, etc
                  > Dancing - maybe put with music, but i don't know...
                  > Gaming - would include stuff from chess to uno and also sports (cuz
                  they're
                  > games)
                  > Lierature - Books, poems, stories, etc. bards to novelist.
                  >
                  > That's all i can think of off hand and if u have any ideas dont hesitate
                  to
                  > say.
                  > ----
                  > Sounds good; I didn't know you were working on it.
                  > ----
                  > but a few major ones that really changed (or will change) society should
                  > have to be researched sep.
                  > ----
                  > Of course, new things develop. But as soon as they develop that start to
                  > grow and improve. We have been cloning things since the 50's, but it was
                  > simple stuff and they are constantly improving it. The same thing is true
                  > of Planes. They developed as a revolutionary idea, but they had to
                  improve
                  > it for years.
                  >
                  > As I imagine it, new technologies are invented by smart people in our
                  > society. After they have the idea, you research to rise the percentage.
                  > For example, the Wright Brothers give you Planes 1%. You cannot build an

                  Actually it would be 0% and prob aircraft not planes so it could be even
                  more generalized because what happens when we no longer need planes but use
                  other aircraft?

                  > airfleet the next turn, however. You need to build up the level to the
                  > proper amount by supporting research. This research rate is of course
                  > influenced by other techs like Engineering. A simple WW1 fighter would
                  > require Planes 10% and a bomber would need Planes 15%. After that, every
                  > new plane you make has power and range based on your Planes level. I
                  know
                  > that you already have an Air Transportation basic tech; I am recommending
                  > making it include all airplane related things.

                  Again use that or something similar for the basic tech because as i'm seeing
                  it and the way thing are headed planes will soon be obsolete because they
                  will either be a> hybrids with helicopters b> electromatically propelled
                  aircraft c> hybrids with spaceshuttes. This is from some reasearch i've
                  been keeping track of over the years.

                  > This should have several benefits. A player that did not care much about
                  > technology would not have to get too involved. Thay simply support
                  research
                  > and let the numbers grow. A player that was interested in technology
                  could
                  > ask for more detail. It would be possible to give descriptions for every
                  5%
                  > change in the basic tech. This technophile would get lots of messages
                  like,
                  > "We have discovered Concrete...Our Architecture level has risen 20%." A
                  > player that didn't want such details could simply choose to turn this
                  > message off.

                  That sounds fine. Still i think they should be aware of new basic techs
                  reguardless.

                  > I will make a chart that includes all of the current techs as percentages
                  on
                  > basic technologies or as standalone techs. Then we can discuss it in the
                  > forums. I promise that I will really work on this in detail as soon as my
                  > many final projects have been completed. I have a very rigorous school
                  > curriculum. I have been working on and studying Clash stuff, but this is
                  a
                  > big task as I will try to have technology effects integrated into every
                  area
                  > of the game.
                  >
                  > PS How will Clash end? I never saw any consensus on this. Will it
                  simply
                  > stop at a certain date, or is there some endgame like in civ games? Also,
                  > is the 1000 BC starting set in stone? I would like to start much earlier,
                  > about 6000 BC. The turns would be something reasonable like 20 years and
                  > the attacking (non-garrison) armies would be treated like airplanes.

                  Starting date is temp set at 1000bc...this is far from set in stone. The
                  only ending I've seen is autoending at 2100, but i'd like to continue onward
                  if at all possible plus there was a *little* talk of expansions which would
                  take clash further into future as well as fantasy setting. This is of
                  course besides the point mostly for this model, but we are still keeping it
                  in mind when developing our stuff, esp technology.

                  > PPS Mark, I just got your e-mail. I think this addresses your concerns
                  > about simplicity. A player could get a detailed blow-by-blow account of
                  > technical progress if he or she so desired. But others wouldn't be
                  bothered
                  > by the excess details. Remember, some people don't really care about tech
                  > and are turned off by huge trees. Your idea seems good, but I would
                  > recommend clearly marking the starting place of the new tech. That way a
                  > player knows that they have only researched a little electronics and do
                  not
                  > know 70% of the total sum of electronics knowledge.
                  > You are right that players choose the tech ending point. I recommend
                  three
                  > levels:
                  > Modern: Current technology
                  > Near Future: Predictable technologies that are currently being
                  researched.
                  > The tech tree ends about 50 years in the future. I think I could do this
                  > one well.
                  > Far Future: All the sci-fi stuff like sentient computers, psionic powers,
                  > cyborgs, cloaking devices, anything that LGJ wants to put in there

                  hehe and contacts with other alien civs *chuckles*

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Actually no...its closer to say knight/samari....ninjas were usually pages,
                    diplomats and assasins...ninjitsu is a form of martial arts and weapon
                    training.
                    ---
                    You're right; I forgot.
                    ---
                    but the castles were
                    nothing like european ones. Sure they had walls and has ways to defend
                    against them, but they weren't really fortresses like many of the castles of
                    europe were (until later). Nor did any of them have thick walls or much of
                    the traps that were like those of the european ones. They did have secret
                    rooms and such but no where near ad advanced (artwise maybe more so but for
                    practicality not really, but the practicallity is a realitve trerm). Lets
                    just say that a castle of european make would stand a seige in orient while
                    it wasn't true the other way around (except maybe japan but that's for
                    another reason).
                    ---
                    So Europeans had Fortification of about 70% and Oriental cultures had Fortification of about 40%
                    ---
                    Basically i think we should keep a few in as follows:
                    Nature Worship (this would include shamanism and non-shamanisic religions)
                    Polytheism (such as greece and hinduism for more advanced version)
                    Monotheism (if u don't know what this means....)
                    Path of Enlightenment (Budhism basically)
                    Elemental Worship/Belief (Earth Fire Water Wind for Europe and Fire Water
                    Wind/Lightning for East sometimes wood and nature also.This wouldn't ness be
                    religion but could be)
                    Harmony with Nature (Tasoism and most other oriental religions)

                    This is certainly a chop in the religious section, but i still think chi
                    should be in there, though u may us "ka" also (this too is oriental in
                    origin though)
                    ---
                    These are fine, but I think they should simply be certain percentages on the religion tech, modified by culture.
                    ---
                    I haven't gone through and put in the details as far as
                    improv/units go thats why it looks like it doesn't do anything. That was my
                    next step when u came and helped and i would appreciate it if u could help
                    in that area cuz if we take out those we haveto take out monotheism to keep
                    things non-biased and people would wonder what happens if all u can develope
                    is polytheistic religions.
                    ---
                    Once again, these techs could be wrapped into the Philosophy basic tech and be a certain percentage in that tech. The level of your philosophy has an impact on your society.
                    ---
                    remember were not using "eastern" or "western" cultures. Each culture
                    developes its own methods based on the conditions placed upon them and how
                    the choose to respond to them (and the player also). When u start out u
                    won't choose whether ur chinese or german like in the other civ games.
                    Instead (i'm assuming from what mark says) that u'll choose certain
                    modifiers to start ur culture off with or it will be randomly chosen for
                    each as well as where ur placed. I'm not saying what u said can't be done i
                    just want u to understand what is considered culture by me and mark. If u
                    can come with a way that's fine.
                    ---
                    I know that, but when I refer to culture I maen, "artistic and religious preference." The player chooses that at the beginning. It is like the city style in civ2. It affects nothing in terms of gameplay; it just looks different.
                    ---
                    Also in a skilled hands an army equipped with melee weapons could defeat and
                    army with machine guns and such. Ur right about it being hard to create
                    though. I totally agree. But there was atleast one instances during the
                    "old west" of samari defeating one of the best gunslingers ever in a dual
                    because he was also good in martial arts and jumped behind him and stabbed
                    him. Of course this is a one-on-one battle, but if they are skilled enough
                    it could be done with an entire armies.
                    ---
                    I was saying that tactics are more important than technology. The martial artist could have stabbed the gunslinger no matter what kind of sword he was using and what kind of gun the gunslinger was using. There should be a Tactics basic technology that affects your armies. I am working on this in more detail, but it isn't really important right now.
                    ---
                    however there is currently one
                    working prototype that does learn, not like an AI learns how u play a game
                    and changes strategies, but actually learns like as close to a human as
                    possible is (ie like a Vulcan from Star Trek would, using only logic). This
                    project was actually started several years ago and there working on another
                    prototype now.
                    ---
                    This probably should still be in far futute, not near future. There is a big difference between learning and being self aware. Insects can learn things, but they are not intellegent.
                    ---
                    Well i really didn't...i think i just put that if u have genetic engineering
                    u can get better at cloning.
                    ---
                    You had genetic engineering as a hard prerequisite for cloning. This is a common misconception, but you are right in that it does help. I would like to wrap all of that into a basic technology.
                    ---
                    Now u could because businesses invested there...10 years ago if we wanted to
                    set up a WWN we couldn't have included many of them.
                    ---
                    World Network probably shouldn't be on the tech tree anyway. It is more like a social and political decision. I didn't think that through enough.
                    ---
                    Actually it would be 0% and prob aircraft not planes so it could be even
                    more generalized because what happens when we no longer need planes but use
                    other aircraft?
                    ---
                    I thought that 0% was no knowledge whatsoever. You have 0% Aircraft in 1000 BC. I used plane as a generic aircraft name.
                    ---
                    Again use that or something similar for the basic tech because as i'm seeing
                    it and the way thing are headed planes will soon be obsolete because they
                    will either be a> hybrids with helicopters b> electromatically propelled
                    aircraft c> hybrids with spaceshuttes. This is from some reasearch i've
                    been keeping track of over the years.
                    ---
                    I would consider all of those to be airplanes, at least as far as the game engine is concerned.
                    ---
                    That sounds fine. Still i think they should be aware of new basic techs
                    reguardless.
                    ---
                    Definitely.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      > but the castles were
                      > nothing like european ones. Sure they had walls and has ways to defend
                      > against them, but they weren't really fortresses like many of the castles
                      of
                      > europe were (until later). Nor did any of them have thick walls or much
                      of
                      > the traps that were like those of the european ones. They did have secret
                      > rooms and such but no where near ad advanced (artwise maybe more so but
                      for
                      > practicality not really, but the practicallity is a realitve trerm). Lets
                      > just say that a castle of european make would stand a seige in orient
                      while
                      > it wasn't true the other way around (except maybe japan but that's for
                      > another reason).
                      > ---
                      > So Europeans had Fortification of about 70% and Oriental cultures had
                      > Fortification of about 40%

                      Well maybe 60 for europe...70's a little high anywhere cept england.

                      > Basically i think we should keep a few in as follows:
                      > Nature Worship (this would include shamanism and non-shamanisic religions)
                      > Polytheism (such as greece and hinduism for more advanced version)
                      > Monotheism (if u don't know what this means....)
                      > Path of Enlightenment (Budhism basically)
                      > Elemental Worship/Belief (Earth Fire Water Wind for Europe and Fire Water
                      > Wind/Lightning for East sometimes wood and nature also.This wouldn't ness
                      be
                      > religion but could be)
                      > Harmony with Nature (Tasoism and most other oriental religions)
                      >
                      > This is certainly a chop in the religious section, but i still think chi
                      > should be in there, though u may us "ka" also (this too is oriental in
                      > origin though)
                      > ---
                      > These are fine, but I think they should simply be certain percentages on
                      the
                      > religion tech, modified by culture.

                      Well maybe for some, but they should also reflect cultures...many didn't and
                      still haven't atleast accepted monotheism while others had religions based
                      around the elements some just used them to augment there religion. Some
                      like path of enlightenment could be for more general purposes though.
                      Basically monotheism and, elemetal worship (not belief) and harmony with
                      nature should be carefully done for differnt cultures. I say it for the
                      latter also since many western religions, esp. Christianity, consider humans
                      need to control nature, not live in harmony with it, of course there can be
                      variations and even mixtures of all these i pointed out.

                      > I haven't gone through and put in the details as far as
                      > improv/units go thats why it looks like it doesn't do anything. That was
                      my
                      > next step when u came and helped and i would appreciate it if u could help
                      > in that area cuz if we take out those we haveto take out monotheism to
                      keep
                      > things non-biased and people would wonder what happens if all u can
                      develope
                      > is polytheistic religions.
                      > ---
                      > Once again, these techs could be wrapped into the Philosophy basic tech
                      and
                      > be a certain percentage in that tech. The level of your philosophy has an
                      > impact on your society.

                      As i refered above that's true but it doesn't needs to also address cultural
                      aspects as well as tech level.

                      > remember were not using "eastern" or "western" cultures. Each culture
                      > developes its own methods based on the conditions placed upon them and how
                      > the choose to respond to them (and the player also). When u start out u
                      > won't choose whether ur chinese or german like in the other civ games.
                      > Instead (i'm assuming from what mark says) that u'll choose certain
                      > modifiers to start ur culture off with or it will be randomly chosen for
                      > each as well as where ur placed. I'm not saying what u said can't be done
                      i
                      > just want u to understand what is considered culture by me and mark. If u
                      > can come with a way that's fine.
                      > ---
                      > I know that, but when I refer to culture I maen, "artistic and religious
                      > preference." The player chooses that at the beginning. It is like the
                      city
                      > style in civ2. It affects nothing in terms of gameplay; it just looks
                      > different.

                      Ok...so what types would we have. since this isn't too hard to impliment I'm
                      thinking we should have more than 4 listen in civ2 and also have other
                      modifiers that could affect how it looks slightly. This would also have to
                      be discussed in the graphics forum.

                      > Also in a skilled hands an army equipped with melee weapons could defeat
                      and
                      > army with machine guns and such. Ur right about it being hard to create
                      > though. I totally agree. But there was atleast one instances during the
                      > "old west" of samari defeating one of the best gunslingers ever in a dual
                      > because he was also good in martial arts and jumped behind him and stabbed
                      > him. Of course this is a one-on-one battle, but if they are skilled
                      enough
                      > it could be done with an entire armies.
                      > ---
                      > I was saying that tactics are more important than technology. The martial
                      > artist could have stabbed the gunslinger no matter what kind of sword he
                      was
                      > using and what kind of gun the gunslinger was using. There should be a
                      > Tactics basic technology that affects your armies. I am working on this
                      in
                      > more detail, but it isn't really important right now.

                      True, but technology is quite important. U could be the greatest tactician
                      ever but if ur army is equipped with bows and swords and ur enemy is
                      equipped with tanks, rifles and rockets ur going to loose. Sure you could
                      probably slow them down a lot, but unless u pumped up the tech research ur
                      screwed.

                      > however there is currently one
                      > working prototype that does learn, not like an AI learns how u play a game
                      > and changes strategies, but actually learns like as close to a human as
                      > possible is (ie like a Vulcan from Star Trek would, using only logic).
                      This
                      > project was actually started several years ago and there working on
                      another
                      > prototype now.
                      > ---
                      > This probably should still be in far futute, not near future. There is a
                      > big difference between learning and being self aware. Insects can learn
                      > things, but they are not intellegent.

                      Well we'll see how it goes.

                      > Now u could because businesses invested there...10 years ago if we wanted
                      to
                      > set up a WWN we couldn't have included many of them.
                      > ---
                      > World Network probably shouldn't be on the tech tree anyway. It is more
                      > like a social and political decision. I didn't think that through enough.

                      Hmm well i think it should as a "possible" implimentation or improvement
                      similar to the wonders in civ2, only this would require other civs to help
                      out.

                      > Actually it would be 0% and prob aircraft not planes so it could be even
                      > more generalized because what happens when we no longer need planes but
                      use
                      > other aircraft?
                      > ---
                      > I thought that 0% was no knowledge whatsoever. You have 0% Aircraft in
                      1000
                      > BC. I used plane as a generic aircraft name.

                      No 0% is no knowledge beyond the basic level. And as far as 1000 bc goes
                      they've begun to question that from many findings that they did have
                      knowlege of aircraft of some sort. FE an model airplane was found in an
                      egyptian tomb and it could actually fly. Somewhere in SA there was a ruins
                      where the site looks exactly like a rocket launching site from several years
                      ago, cept there's no rocket (and its made of stone), in india they have some
                      ruins which represent part of a starmap 128,000 years ago, yet the earliest
                      recorded history of civilization wasn't until 40,000 bc. The pyramids in
                      eqypt are also arranged in the exact same pattern. I guess i got really
                      carried away there, but i just hate that most places keep out this stuff cuz
                      it doesn't go with what they have and don't want to change history because
                      they might be proven wrong.

                      > Again use that or something similar for the basic tech because as i'm
                      seeing
                      > it and the way thing are headed planes will soon be obsolete because they
                      > will either be a> hybrids with helicopters b> electromatically propelled
                      > aircraft c> hybrids with spaceshuttes. This is from some reasearch i've
                      > been keeping track of over the years.
                      > ---
                      > I would consider all of those to be airplanes, at least as far as the game
                      > engine is concerned.

                      That's why i say it should just be aircraft istead. FE would u consider a
                      helicopter a plane? and if not then should a hybrid of that go with planes
                      or with helicopters? Space shuttles aren't planes so should the hybrid go
                      with that or spacecraft? That ones trickier. But having aircraft only will
                      allow us to put blimps, hot air balloons, etc in there also.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Well maybe 60 for europe...70's a little high anywhere cept england.
                        ---
                        The numbers I am giving are just general estimates.
                        ---
                        Well maybe for some, but they should also reflect cultures...many didn't and
                        still haven't atleast accepted monotheism while others had religions based
                        around the elements some just used them to augment there religion. Some
                        like path of enlightenment could be for more general purposes though.
                        Basically monotheism and, elemetal worship (not belief) and harmony with
                        nature should be carefully done for differnt cultures. I say it for the
                        latter also since many western religions, esp. Christianity, consider humans
                        need to control nature, not live in harmony with it, of course there can be
                        variations and even mixtures of all these i pointed out.
                        ---
                        This is exactly why I recommend not using one tech tree for everyone. Each culture group should have a unique religion tech; the progression different for everyone. I think that we should stay with history on this one.
                        ---
                        As i refered above that's true but it doesn't needs to also address cultural
                        aspects as well as tech level.
                        ---
                        Once again, use the template tech idea for culture. Everyone's Philiosphy is different, but does about the same thing. As far as the game engine is concerned everything is just Philosophy X%, but the player sees a tech progression that is accurate to the culture they chose.
                        ---
                        Ok...so what types would we have. since this isn't too hard to impliment I'm
                        thinking we should have more than 4 listen in civ2 and also have other
                        modifiers that could affect how it looks slightly. This would also have to
                        be discussed in the graphics forum.
                        ---
                        The main culture groups I can think of at the moment:
                        North American Natives
                        South American Natives
                        African Natives
                        Pacific Islanders
                        Northern European (Vikings, Scandinavians, Germanic Tribes)
                        Southern European (Greek, Roman, Feudal System)
                        Arab (Islamic)
                        Eurasian Tribes (Mongols, Scythians)
                        Southeast Asia/India
                        China/Japan
                        If you want to change the Asian cultures, go ahead. That was just a rough grouping.
                        ---
                        True, but technology is quite important. U could be the greatest tactician
                        ever but if ur army is equipped with bows and swords and ur enemy is
                        equipped with tanks, rifles and rockets ur going to loose. Sure you could
                        probably slow them down a lot, but unless u pumped up the tech research ur
                        screwed.
                        ---
                        Of Course. I was referring to minor changes like Leather vs. Curballi and Katana vs. a basic sword.
                        ---
                        Well we'll see how it goes.
                        ---
                        For the near future I would include AI that can run a factory, but I think that emotions and sentience are a long way off. Can we agree on that cutoff?
                        ---
                        Hmm well i think it should as a "possible" implimentation or improvement
                        similar to the wonders in civ2, only this would require other civs to help
                        out.
                        ---
                        Exactly. It belongs in Diplomacy.
                        ---
                        No 0% is no knowledge beyond the basic level.
                        ---
                        I was considering 1% flight the ability to get a human off the ground with a powered machine. 1% is the ability to do the minimum level of something.
                        ---
                        And as far as 1000 bc goes they've begun to question that from many findings that they did have knowlege of aircraft of some sort.
                        ---
                        There is a big difference between knowledge and speculation. People have always wanted to fly and have always been dreaming up ways to do it. There is a story from Roman times about someone going to the moon. But people did not actually lift off until 1903. I think the tech tree should measure the ability to actually do something.
                        ---
                        FE an model airplane was found in an egyptian tomb and it could actually fly.
                        ---
                        Any kid can make a rubber band airplane or a balsa wood glider, but it takes a lot of technical skill to make an airplane with a motor capable of moving a person. The egyptians might have known a bit about aerodymanics, but they didn't have the ability to make a motor so they could never fly.
                        ---
                        Somewhere in SA there was a ruins where the site looks exactly like a rocket launching site from several years ago, cept there's no rocket (and its made of stone), in india they have some ruins which represent part of a starmap 128,000 years ago, yet the earliest recorded history of civilization wasn't until 40,000 bc. The pyramids in eqypt are also arranged in the exact same pattern. I guess i got really carried away there, but i just hate that most places keep out this stuff cuz it doesn't go with what they have and don't want to change history because they might be proven wrong.
                        ---
                        I don't think any of this will fit in Clash. It is too far in the past and it is not documented; we don't know what really happened. I think Clash should start when people started recording their history. 6000 BC was about the time of the first big city and the first real writing.
                        ---
                        That's why i say it should just be aircraft istead. FE would u consider a
                        helicopter a plane? and if not then should a hybrid of that go with planes
                        or with helicopters? Space shuttles aren't planes so should the hybrid go
                        with that or spacecraft? That ones trickier. But having aircraft only will
                        allow us to put blimps, hot air balloons, etc in there also.
                        ---
                        Sorry I wasn't being clear. I was using plane to mean any heavier than air craft that uses fixed wings to provide lift. I think that hovering craft should be an entirely different technology. From a military tactics standpoint there are things you can do with helocopters that you simply cannot do with planes. Lumping them into one category would erase that distinction.
                        The hybrid cutoff is based on what the thing can do. If it can hover for extended periods of time it goes with Hovering Flight. If not it goes with Powered Flight. If it goes into space it is an aspect of Space Flight. Otherwise it is still Powered Flight.
                        As for balloons, I would recommend that Lighter than Air Flight is also a seperate technology.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          > Well maybe for some, but they should also reflect cultures...many didn't
                          and
                          > still haven't atleast accepted monotheism while others had religions based
                          > around the elements some just used them to augment there religion. Some
                          > like path of enlightenment could be for more general purposes though.
                          > Basically monotheism and, elemetal worship (not belief) and harmony with
                          > nature should be carefully done for differnt cultures. I say it for the
                          > latter also since many western religions, esp. Christianity, consider
                          humans
                          > need to control nature, not live in harmony with it, of course there can
                          be
                          > variations and even mixtures of all these i pointed out.
                          > ---
                          > This is exactly why I recommend not using one tech tree for everyone.
                          Each
                          > culture group should have a unique religion tech; the progression
                          different
                          > for everyone. I think that we should stay with history on this one.
                          > ---
                          > As i refered above that's true but it doesn't needs to also address
                          cultural
                          > aspects as well as tech level.
                          > ---
                          > Once again, use the template tech idea for culture. Everyone's Philiosphy
                          > is different, but does about the same thing. As far as the game engine is
                          > concerned everything is just Philosophy X%, but the player sees a tech
                          > progression that is accurate to the culture they chose.

                          Ok so how are we going to impliment this. And how many philosophies are
                          there and would it be possible to mix and match from differnt philosophies
                          (i'm asking cuz this is very much so related to the formation of new
                          religions and philosophies as discussed in the social model)

                          > The main culture groups I can think of at the moment:
                          > North American Natives
                          > South American Natives
                          > African Natives
                          > Pacific Islanders
                          > Northern European (Vikings, Scandinavians, Germanic Tribes)
                          > Southern European (Greek, Roman, Feudal System)
                          > Arab (Islamic)
                          > Eurasian Tribes (Mongols, Scythians)
                          > Southeast Asia/India
                          > China/Japan
                          > If you want to change the Asian cultures, go ahead. That was just a rough
                          > grouping.

                          Some more to add:
                          Celtic Natives
                          Arab (Pre-islamic)

                          These should diverge somewhat later or condense FE:
                          Japan and China were 2 completly differnt countries do to several affects
                          mongolian invasion of china, japan's feudal system, but in the begining
                          that's fine.
                          SE asia is completly differnt from india in the way things should be
                          presented and shown
                          .
                          Also we still have to deal with what they'd look like in modern days and how
                          many differnt types they're be. Heres my proposal. Note that all these are
                          post-industial:

                          African Natives
                          Northern Europe
                          Southern Europe
                          Eastern Europe/Russia
                          Eastern US/E. Canada
                          Western US/W/NW Canada
                          Central/S. Americas
                          Arabian/Sahara Deserts
                          Central and Southern Africa
                          India
                          SE Asia
                          China
                          Japan
                          Oceana

                          Anyway this is just a rouge guess so feel free to edit it.

                          > For the near future I would include AI that can run a factory, but I think
                          > that emotions and sentience are a long way off. Can we agree on that
                          > cutoff?

                          Yea fully automated factories is fine.

                          > No 0% is no knowledge beyond the basic level.
                          > ---
                          > I was considering 1% flight the ability to get a human off the ground with
                          a
                          > powered machine. 1% is the ability to do the minimum level of something.

                          We'll haveto see cuz that was completly differnt from what i had.

                          > I don't think any of this will fit in Clash. It is too far in the past
                          and
                          > it is not documented; we don't know what really happened. I think Clash
                          > should start when people started recording their history. 6000 BC was
                          about
                          > the time of the first big city and the first real writing.

                          That's fine its just we should give ancient cultures a measure of well
                          diginity that they were more advanced than we were/are in some area. This
                          would be modeled in a loss over time. I don't think that every culture in
                          ancient times should be represented as it was in civ2, ie really
                          technologically inferior in every way. Sure they didn't have cars or planes
                          but they were exceellent architects, astonomers, engineers, etc. Civ2 was
                          made on outdated data and we know now that these cultures weren't as dumb as
                          we thought.

                          > That's why i say it should just be aircraft istead. FE would u consider a
                          > helicopter a plane? and if not then should a hybrid of that go with
                          planes
                          > or with helicopters? Space shuttles aren't planes so should the hybrid go
                          > with that or spacecraft? That ones trickier. But having aircraft only
                          will
                          > allow us to put blimps, hot air balloons, etc in there also.
                          > ---
                          > Sorry I wasn't being clear. I was using plane to mean any heavier than
                          air
                          > craft that uses fixed wings to provide lift. I think that hovering craft
                          > should be an entirely different technology. From a military tactics
                          > standpoint there are things you can do with helocopters that you simply
                          > cannot do with planes. Lumping them into one category would erase that
                          > distinction.
                          > The hybrid cutoff is based on what the thing can do. If it can hover for
                          > extended periods of time it goes with Hovering Flight. If not it goes
                          with
                          > Powered Flight. If it goes into space it is an aspect of Space Flight.

                          Okay what if it could go in space, but not to orbit, but just for better
                          speed between cities? And hovering a helicopter or rotaty-bladed hovering
                          isn't the same as electro-magnetic hovering.

                          > As for balloons, I would recommend that Lighter than Air Flight is also a
                          > seperate technology.

                          So how many do we have then?

                          Some things on the basic tech chart would also require seperate things being
                          discovered that wouldn't be learned on the basic techs as they progress (ie
                          the major breakthroughs in history that mark was talking about)
                          ---
                          I was planning on including that. Foe Example, You can never get Ships
                          beyond a certain level if you don't have Steel Working.

                          Well i meant that in this case steel working wouldn't be linked with an
                          instant discovery based on metallurgy tech level but would have to be
                          reasearched seperatly. Also i think u should be careful on how u limit the
                          advancement of ships and others since even today we're improving the quality
                          of these ships (mainly for sports and leisure, but it would still be
                          practical if the tech levels wouldn't have changed)

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Ok so how are we going to impliment this. And how many philosophies are
                            there and would it be possible to mix and match from differnt philosophies
                            (i'm asking cuz this is very much so related to the formation of new
                            religions and philosophies as discussed in the social model)
                            ---
                            When I was discussing philosophy, I was refererring to things like Chivalry or Way of the Blade that almost everyone in your society will accept.
                            But your concerns about the social model do need to be considered. They should fit into this model. The religion/philosophy that you choose is the dominant one. All of the others are minority cultural agents that develop after you meet other cultures. This can change if your civ is doing badly; if another civ is doing better than yours, your people will start to look up to them and shift to their culture.
                            Also, it is still possible to have competing philosophies within a broad cultural group. There were many competing Greek philosophied like Stoic and Epicurean, but they were all Greek.
                            ---
                            Some more to add:
                            Celtic Natives
                            Arab (Pre-islamic)
                            ---
                            Arabs developed Islam just as Europeans developed Christianity. They were still the same people. This culture group would develop Islam eventually, just as Oriental cultures would develop Chi aftr a while.
                            I think that making Celts seperate is too much detail. I would consider them part of the Northern European group that also includes vikings, germanic tribes, etc. If we had a seperate culture for every tribe like that there would be thousands of cultures. For example, Thai and Vietmanese are different in more ways than Celts and Vikings are different.
                            ---
                            These should diverge somewhat later or condense FE:
                            Japan and China were 2 completly differnt countries do to several affects
                            mongolian invasion of china, japan's feudal system, but in the begining
                            that's fine.
                            ---
                            Remember that I consider government to be independent of culture in this context.
                            ---
                            SE asia is completly differnt from india in the way things should be
                            presented and shown
                            ---
                            You're right.
                            ---
                            Also we still have to deal with what they'd look like in modern days and how
                            many differnt types they're be. Heres my proposal. Note that all these are
                            post-industial:

                            African Natives -OK
                            Northern Europe -OK
                            Southern Europe -OK
                            Eastern Europe/Russia -I forgot them.
                            Eastern US/E. Canada -?
                            Western US/W/NW Canada -How are these two really different?
                            Central/S. Americas -OK
                            Arabian/Sahara Deserts -OK
                            Central and Southern Africa -How is this different from African Natives?
                            India -OK
                            SE Asia -OK
                            China -
                            Japan -In terms of art and religion, Japanese and Chinese cultures are very similar; or close enough at the macro level.
                            Oceana -Pacific Islanders?

                            We'll haveto see cuz [1% vs. 0%] was completly differnt from what i had.
                            ---
                            Could you elaborate?
                            ---
                            That's fine its just we should give ancient cultures a measure of well
                            diginity that they were more advanced than we were/are in some area. This
                            would be modeled in a loss over time. I don't think that every culture in
                            ancient times should be represented as it was in civ2, ie really
                            technologically inferior in every way. Sure they didn't have cars or planes
                            but they were exceellent architects, astonomers, engineers, etc. Civ2 was
                            made on outdated data and we know now that these cultures weren't as dumb as
                            we thought.
                            ---
                            It is true that ancient cultures often did very well with what they had, but the simple fact is that we have far more. Consider astronomy. Ancient astronomers did amazing things, considering they only had eyesight and simple math. But that does not change the fact that we know far more than they did about every aspect of the skies. We simply have better technology to look at and analyze the stars, and as a result we know more than they did by a factor of millions.
                            When it comes to things like art I totally agree. I would put almost any ancient culture at 150% of modern ability in the Fine Arts.
                            ---
                            Okay what if it could go in space, but not to orbit, but just for better
                            speed between cities? And hovering a helicopter or rotaty-bladed hovering
                            isn't the same as electro-magnetic hovering.
                            ---
                            If the purpose of something is move from point A to point B on Earth, then it would be Powered Flight.
                            How are helicopter really different from EM hovercrafts? They do the same thing. We have propellers, jets, and stealth all lumped into the one technology of Powered Flight, so why is this different enough to be seperate?
                            ---
                            So how many do we have then?
                            ---
                            Powered Flight, Hover Flight, and Lighter than Air Flight.
                            ---
                            Well i meant that in this case steel working wouldn't be linked with an
                            instant discovery based on metallurgy tech level but would have to be
                            reasearched seperatly. Also i think u should be careful on how u limit the
                            advancement of ships and others since even today we're improving the quality
                            of these ships (mainly for sports and leisure, but it would still be
                            practical if the tech levels wouldn't have changed)
                            ---
                            I would consider the very first Steel working to be Metal Working of maybe 35%. They had steel weapons around 100 BC. After that it slowly increased until they were able to use steel for many more things. There was no single revolutionary thing except maybe the Bessemer Process. And the result of that would be equivalent of raising Metal Working about 10% at most. Technology usually does not advance in huge leaps. It increases as a result of people slowly improving things over many years.
                            With the limiting factors, I was thinking more in terms of soft prerequisites. After you get ships of X%, it becomes harder to increase them. The difficulty increases the farther you advance beyond that percentage.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              > Ok so how are we going to impliment this. And how many philosophies are
                              > there and would it be possible to mix and match from differnt philosophies
                              > (i'm asking cuz this is very much so related to the formation of new
                              > religions and philosophies as discussed in the social model)
                              > ---
                              > When I was discussing philosophy, I was refererring to things like
                              Chivalry
                              > or Way of the Blade that almost everyone in your society will accept.
                              > But your concerns about the social model do need to be considered. They
                              > should fit into this model. The religion/philosophy that you choose is
                              the
                              > dominant one. All of the others are minority cultural agents that develop
                              > after you meet other cultures. This can change if your civ is doing
                              badly;
                              > if another civ is doing better than yours, your people will start to look
                              up
                              > to them and shift to their culture.
                              > Also, it is still possible to have competing philosophies within a broad
                              > cultural group. There were many competing Greek philosophied like Stoic
                              and
                              > Epicurean, but they were all Greek.

                              Ok I'll wait and see when its done...Any idea since i know this is really my
                              last week as to when that might be the case?

                              > Some more to add:
                              > Celtic Natives
                              > Arab (Pre-islamic)
                              > ---
                              > Arabs developed Islam just as Europeans developed Christianity. They were
                              > still the same people. This culture group would develop Islam eventually,
                              > just as Oriental cultures would develop Chi aftr a while.
                              > I think that making Celts seperate is too much detail. I would consider
                              > them part of the Northern European group that also includes vikings,
                              > germanic tribes, etc. If we had a seperate culture for every tribe like
                              > that there would be thousands of cultures. For example, Thai and
                              Vietmanese
                              > are different in more ways than Celts and Vikings are different.

                              Actually, no, not really before Christinaity most of Europe was either
                              Greeko-Roman or Germanic-like. Same was true for arabia and Islam.

                              > These should diverge somewhat later or condense FE:
                              > Japan and China were 2 completly differnt countries do to several affects
                              > mongolian invasion of china, japan's feudal system, but in the begining
                              > that's fine.
                              > ---
                              > Remember that I consider government to be independent of culture in this
                              > context.

                              If its art ur talking about that's okay, but culturally they were vastly
                              diff.

                              > SE asia is completly differnt from india in the way things should be
                              > presented and shown
                              > ---
                              > You're right.

                              > Also we still have to deal with what they'd look like in modern days and
                              how
                              > many differnt types they're be. Heres my proposal. Note that all these
                              are
                              > post-industial:
                              >
                              > African Natives -OK
                              > Northern Europe -OK
                              > Southern Europe -OK
                              > Eastern Europe/Russia -I forgot them.
                              > Eastern US/E. Canada -?
                              > Western US/W/NW Canada -How are these two really different?
                              > Central/S. Americas -OK
                              > Arabian/Sahara Deserts -OK
                              > Central and Southern Africa -How is this different from African Natives?
                              > India -OK
                              > SE Asia -OK
                              > China -
                              > Japan -In terms of art and religion, Japanese and Chinese cultures are
                              very
                              > similar; or close enough at the macro level.
                              > Oceana -Pacific Islanders?

                              If u've lived in one side of the US and the other you'll see a drastic diff.
                              In the way people live. Out in the west, cept along coast, people are much
                              more spread out and have diff values in many places which go against
                              enviroemental ways also. In the east there are many more cities and roads
                              and the lifestyle is completely diff.

                              Art is the same basically. Religion for modern day China/Japan isn't. Its
                              almost compeletly diff as can be. China is still rooted very much to its
                              old ways cept for Christianity and Japan has embraced secularism and ways of
                              US cept for Christianity and Islam. They still have things like Christmas
                              (secular reason) and some psudeo-Christian/Shintoism type religions, but its
                              not the same (2% total pop.) so in terms of modern day Japan is both a
                              western and eastern country which is why it needs its own i think for modern
                              times, maybe not ancient. Then again Japan was the only country to have
                              samari and ninja types. China, Korea, Mongolia, etc didn't. Anyway it
                              doesn't really matter for the latter if its just artwise and religion wise
                              ur talking about.

                              > We'll haveto see cuz [1% vs. 0%] was completly differnt from what i had.
                              > ---
                              > Could you elaborate?

                              0% in my terms would be the very basic knowledge of what is ness to know
                              that basic tech. 100% would be double basic knowledge. It won't appear
                              until u've got the related techs ness to develope them so ur right when u
                              say a lot of things will be at 0%, but they will not even show up as
                              possible so in essence its like saying there at -1% or something. I'm
                              assuming for urs 100% is equal to modern times since 1% is ness for any
                              implimentation.

                              > That's fine its just we should give ancient cultures a measure of well
                              > diginity that they were more advanced than we were/are in some area. This
                              > would be modeled in a loss over time. I don't think that every culture in
                              > ancient times should be represented as it was in civ2, ie really
                              > technologically inferior in every way. Sure they didn't have cars or
                              planes
                              > but they were exceellent architects, astonomers, engineers, etc. Civ2 was
                              > made on outdated data and we know now that these cultures weren't as dumb
                              as
                              > we thought.
                              > ---
                              > It is true that ancient cultures often did very well with what they had,
                              but
                              > the simple fact is that we have far more. Consider astronomy. Ancient
                              > astronomers did amazing things, considering they only had eyesight and
                              > simple math. But that does not change the fact that we know far more than
                              > they did about every aspect of the skies. We simply have better
                              technology
                              > to look at and analyze the stars, and as a result we know more than they
                              did
                              > by a factor of millions.
                              > When it comes to things like art I totally agree. I would put almost any
                              > ancient culture at 150% of modern ability in the Fine Arts.

                              Yes we have progressed far more so than many of the ancient cultures. But
                              that was only recently, 1800s or somewhere around then. There are still a
                              few things they were higher at than were still are (such as the egyptians
                              and their tech related to sound), but that's not relivant to this model i
                              don't think. Basically up until near the end of Rome in the west and very
                              ancient times in India and about 800 or so in China was when things were
                              still remembered. As far as art goes this was true of many cities in
                              ancient times, but maybe not quite that high, with a few exceptions.

                              > Okay what if it could go in space, but not to orbit, but just for better
                              > speed between cities? And hovering a helicopter or rotaty-bladed hovering
                              > isn't the same as electro-magnetic hovering.
                              > ---
                              > If the purpose of something is move from point A to point B on Earth, then
                              > it would be Powered Flight.
                              > How are helicopter really different from EM hovercrafts? They do the same
                              > thing. We have propellers, jets, and stealth all lumped into the one
                              > technology of Powered Flight, so why is this different enough to be
                              > seperate?

                              EM propulsion is vastly diff. It uses a whole different way of keeping
                              above ground, propelling and movement. Proppeller like craft keep
                              themselves up by esentially trying to lighten themselves by wind currents so
                              they can take off and keep them spinning to continue movement. EM
                              propulsion uses the eletro-magnetic spectrum to "charge" the craft with
                              energy which can repel it off of the surface like opposite magnets. The
                              charge has to be maintained, but the way its done is so fundamentally diff
                              than any other way we've tried to fly.

                              > So how many do we have then?
                              > ---
                              > Powered Flight, Hover Flight, and Lighter than Air Flight.

                              > Well i meant that in this case steel working wouldn't be linked with an
                              > instant discovery based on metallurgy tech level but would have to be
                              > reasearched seperatly. Also i think u should be careful on how u limit
                              the
                              > advancement of ships and others since even today we're improving the
                              quality
                              > of these ships (mainly for sports and leisure, but it would still be
                              > practical if the tech levels wouldn't have changed)
                              > ---
                              > I would consider the very first Steel working to be Metal Working of maybe
                              > 35%. They had steel weapons around 100 BC. After that it slowly
                              increased
                              > until they were able to use steel for many more things. There was no
                              single
                              > revolutionary thing except maybe the Bessemer Process. And the result of
                              > that would be equivalent of raising Metal Working about 10% at most.
                              > Technology usually does not advance in huge leaps. It increases as a
                              result
                              > of people slowly improving things over many years.
                              > With the limiting factors, I was thinking more in terms of soft
                              > prerequisites. After you get ships of X%, it becomes harder to increase
                              > them. The difficulty increases the farther you advance beyond that
                              > percentage.

                              Ok well remember that things like iron and copper working still have to have
                              access to appropraite materials before they can be discovered at all.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X