Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Destroying colony pods

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    You can always divide the number by 10 and drop fractions
    (\__/) 07/07/1937 - Never forget
    (='.'=) "Claims demand evidence; extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence." -- Carl Sagan
    (")_(") "Starting the fire from within."

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Googlie
      Well - when your size-1 base commissions its first terraformer, (f you're like me and invest that first row of minerals in a terraformer), you are immediately tying up over 1/3rd of that base's population if it's just 1000.
      That is true, but also note that if you continue snooping around in that file, you will see that all units have certain amounts of people...terraformers also weren't built in the very, very beginning, as you can see in the stories of SMAC, but it took about 1 or 2 years...long enough for the population of SMAC to easily double, considering the age of most of the people...

      I forgot the name of the file, but it'd be nice if the staff on the colony pod was posted as well...

      Comment


      • #33
        Back when SMAC first came out I was hoping that the flavor of struggling in a hostile environment would more thoroughly permeate the game.

        I saw it as a terraformer was literally one set of machinery, crew and support personnel, perhaps 50-100 people. Same with military units, more like platoons rather than Civ-esque battalion+ sized.
        (\__/) Save a bunny, eat more Smurf!
        (='.'=) Sponsored by the National Smurfmeat Council
        (")_(") Smurf, the original blue meat! © 1999, patent pending, ® and ™ (except that "Smurf" bit)

        Comment


        • #34
          here it is:

          extracted from flavor.txt
          #COLONY MODULE
          Complement: 1000+
          Composition: Prefab plastic
          Hydroponics rating: indef.
          Armament: Sidearms only
          Armor: Passive (Applique)

          Comment


          • #35
            Destoying a Pod doesn't mean killing 1000 people, only destroying their equipment for setting up a colony. The people then make their way to whatever shelter they can find.
            (\__/) Save a bunny, eat more Smurf!
            (='.'=) Sponsored by the National Smurfmeat Council
            (")_(") Smurf, the original blue meat! © 1999, patent pending, ® and ™ (except that "Smurf" bit)

            Comment


            • #36
              Yeah, because without their equipment and miles from the nearest base, they're just going to make oxygen out of thin air

              Comment


              • #37
                Actually, the air on Alpha Centauri is pretty thick, and contains a half-decent amount of oxygen.
                "Cutlery confused Stalin"
                -BBC news

                Comment


                • #38
                  yeah, but nitrogen narcosis is fun too.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    It might be at that, as suggested by the word "narcosis". However, I'm sure that it's quite toxic.
                    "Cutlery confused Stalin"
                    -BBC news

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      without roughly the air supply % we have here on earth,you would quickly die afaik. rasing the % would raise your metabolism(with - effects) and less would make you sleepy and ineffective
                      if you want to stop terrorism; stop participating in it

                      ''Oh,Commissar,if we could put the potatoes in one pile,they would reach the foot of God''.But,replied the commissar,''This is the Soviet Union.There is no God''.''Thats all right'' said the worker,''There are no potatoes''

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        People can survive, after acclimatization, on about .07 atmospheres partial pressure O2 (which is about what the top of Everest has). Planet has .15 atmospheres partial pressure O2, higher than many high-altitude places where people live on Earth, so oxygen's not the problem, at least at sea level. Nitrogen is substantially more prevelant, at 1.6 atm partial pressure vs .79 atm on Earth, but I'm not sure what the effects of that concentration are. It doesn't seem high enough to cause serious problems. CO2 concentrations are lower on Planet, of course, and the only other gas listed is argon, which is inert.
                        "Cutlery confused Stalin"
                        -BBC news

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          As Chaos Theory already pointed out, Chiron’s atmosphere is denser therefore exercising a partial pressure of 1.6~1.8 atmospheres. When we take percentage of oxygen into account this leads to partial pressure of oxygen roughly 70% that of our own. Chiron’s atmosphere is breathable, albeit barely at sea level. Without breathing equipment or genetic enhanchment Chironians should have difficulty breathing so I think they would wear air masks.

                          Another consequence of increased gravity on Chiron (1.31 of Earth gravity) is that partial pressure of oxygen decreases quickly with altitude. Colonists who would work on high altitudes would certainly need more breathing equipment if not oxygen supply. This effect also decreases the likelihood and danger of fires on planet which is probably why we never sight forestfire events.
                          SMAC/X FAQ | Chiron Archives
                          The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man. --G.B.Shaw

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Would the pressure at sea level not be enough that nitrogen diffuses into bloodstream, then forms bubbles?

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              If the pressure can't cause nitrogen narcosis, I don't believe it can cause such an effect.
                              SMAC/X FAQ | Chiron Archives
                              The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man. --G.B.Shaw

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Senethro: you're referring to the bends, which results from decompression when a large amount of nitrogen is already dissolved in the blood. If you were to remain at a constant pressure, no amount of atmospheric nitrogen could cause the bends, since there would be no decompression.
                                "Cutlery confused Stalin"
                                -BBC news

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X