Tweet
Well for us the three dimensional ants at least the time dimension is different than the other three. It has a direction.
-
Be good, and if at first you don't succeed, perhaps failure will be back in fashion soon. -- teh Spamski
Grapefruit Garden -
This does not correspond to space time theory, but merely tries to make time look as a tape that binds infinite number of 3-dimensional universes without any time dimensions, only space ones. Thus such universes experience no change and are just like images on paper, same for eternity. Analogy to this would be a notebook with a similar, but slightly different picture on each. When we browse it really fastly, it seems like if there is one picture that is moving. This is the concept of animation. This concept would show that time what we perceive, is actually feeling the difference whiel passing through infinite number of very similar, but slightly different universes on a "timetape" that intersects it.Originally posted by binTravkin
Hear what some quite competent people think about time's nature:
Time is a continual movement from one universe to another and all those universes which we have gone through co-exist with this one we are right now.
No. It corresponds only if the travel is made into parallel universes. That is not deemed so impossible as travelling through time of OUR universe.This corresponds with that frequency theorem & if its true timetravel is possible & it wont have impact to future or nowadays to change events of past..
Time is considered as 4th dimension, but it is bot yet clear what kind of 4th dimension? Is it another kind of "space" dimension, and why does it appear that it is only halfdimensional to us (except the tachyons)? Why is not whole like other dimensions, or do we just perceive time as such?Time is also considered 4th dimension and it should be very close to truth as it posesses all attributes that dimension must have..SMAC/X FAQ | Chiron Archives
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man. --G.B.ShawComment
-
There are two dimensional ants?Originally posted by HongHu
Well for us the three dimensional ants at least the time dimension is different than the other three. It has a direction.
SMAC/X FAQ | Chiron Archives
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man. --G.B.ShawComment
-
Ants that are confined to two dimensions, how about that.
Be good, and if at first you don't succeed, perhaps failure will be back in fashion soon. -- teh Spamski
Grapefruit GardenComment
-
Lifeforms can`t exist in less than three dimensions
.
SMAC/X FAQ | Chiron Archives
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man. --G.B.ShawComment
-
Come on, be a little more open up.Be good, and if at first you don't succeed, perhaps failure will be back in fashion soon. -- teh Spamski
Grapefruit GardenComment
-
This discussion seems halted. Too bad, it was interesting...
Comment
-
SMAC/X FAQ | Chiron Archives
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man. --G.B.ShawComment
-
Why the sadness in your eyes, Ob?
Comment
-
Look at your post before that.SMAC/X FAQ | Chiron Archives
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man. --G.B.ShawComment
-
I once readed a Sci-Fi novel about two-dimensional lifeforms. Not surprisingly, they were contacted through a computer.
Comment
-
Ok ok! I'll concede. There is no lifeform existing in less than three dimentions. And we are really very different from those little three dimentional ants. And there is no way to time travel if one has a tiny bit of logic.
...
Boy I better have more than a tiny bit of logic. How else am I gonna go back to my world?
Be good, and if at first you don't succeed, perhaps failure will be back in fashion soon. -- teh Spamski
Grapefruit GardenComment
-
Were they on a surface of a neutron star?Originally posted by GeoModder
I once readed a Sci-Fi novel about two-dimensional lifeforms. Not surprisingly, they were contacted through a computer.
SMAC/X FAQ | Chiron Archives
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man. --G.B.ShawComment
-
No, living on a planetary circle
And one of the parameters in their universe was that gravity reduced only half instead of a quarter for a given distance of a gravitational body.Comment
-
Then it is not the same book we read.
They were even living in two dimensional universe? Cool. At least they obide multidimensional mathemathics.SMAC/X FAQ | Chiron Archives
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man. --G.B.ShawComment
Comment