Tweet
-
-
wait why is he still banned? hasn't it been like a month?Comment
-
it's been a few weeks yea, but he hasn't begged so he's not unbanned.Comment
-
I had a boss once who refused to hire people until they, well, you KNOW. She was arrested thank god
Comment
-
Are you suggesting anyone on staff here would want to see him beg?
Enjoy Slurm - it's highly addictive!Comment
-
it is not a suggestion.Comment
-
There were several demands that Ming wanted Asher to meet before unbanning him. Being as how those two are not the most agreeable of individuals, it didn't happen.Originally posted by Wiglaf
wait why is he still banned? hasn't it been like a month?Click here if you're having trouble sleeping.
"We confess our little faults to persuade people that we have no large ones." - François de La RochefoucauldComment
-
Do you always just make stuff up when you have no clue what you are talking about?Originally posted by Lorizael
There were several demands that Ming wanted Asher to meet before unbanning him. Being as how those two are not the most agreeable of individuals, it didn't happen.
Keep on Civin'
RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron OComment
-
I was under the impression that he hadn't successfully convinced you...Originally posted by Ming
Asher has been banned for breaking the rules repeatedly. He will be released when he convinces us that he will play by the rules... He made that promise that he would as he was posting PM's at another site, which is also against the rules. He has proven repeatedly that he has no interest in following the rules.
What am I making up?Click here if you're having trouble sleeping.
"We confess our little faults to persuade people that we have no large ones." - François de La RochefoucauldComment
-
That is a LOT different than this...Asher has been banned for breaking the rules repeatedly. He will be released when he convinces us that he will play by the rules... He made that promise that he would as he was posting PM's at another site, which is also against the rules. He has proven repeatedly that he has no interest in following the rules.
Yes, ALL THE OWNERS OF THIS SITE would like him to convince us that he won't continue to insult people on this site, and continue to cause the disruptions he's so famous for before he is allowed to post again... especially since he has made similar promises in the past, and not lived up to them... He has not even attempted to do so to date.Originally posted by Lorizael
There were several demands that Ming wanted Asher to meet before unbanning him. Being as how those two are not the most agreeable of individuals, it didn't happen.
But that's not what you claim. Your response is just something you made up with no basis of fact.Keep on Civin'
RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron OComment
-
Pekka? Fez? This does not sound like you, Ming.Originally posted by Ming
Your response is just something you made up with no basis of fact.
Anyways, this is a stupid argument and I have no desire to engage in it. Asher is still banned because he didn't do what you (you, the owners, Apolyton, whatever) wanted him to do. Anything else is just semantics - something I am paid money to deal with.Click here if you're having trouble sleeping.
"We confess our little faults to persuade people that we have no large ones." - François de La RochefoucauldComment
-
No. You're being petty, Ming.Originally posted by Ming
That is a LOT different than this...
Lorizael was giving a perfectly acceptable, simple explanation of the situation and you misread them as being an intentionally twisted acount because you know Lorizael didn't/doesn't agree with how things went.Comment
-
QFTOriginally posted by Mercator
No. You're being petty, Ming.
Lorizael was giving a perfectly acceptable, simple explanation of the situation and you misread them as being an intentionally twisted acount because you know Lorizael didn't/doesn't agree with how things went.“I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
- John 13:34-35 (NRSV)Comment
-
Originally posted by Mercator
No. You're being petty, Ming.
Petty... gee, I'm not the one that typed...
Being as how those two are not the most agreeable of individualsKeep on Civin'
RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron OComment
-
Im glad he got banned. He deserved it.*"Winning is still the goal, and we cannot win if we lose (gawd, that was brilliant - you can quote me on that if you want. And con - I don't want to see that in your sig."- BetaComment
Comment