Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

De-autocensor ***

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Ming's response was courteous and said all that was needed.
    "We may be in a hallucination here, but that's no excuse for being delusional!." K.S. Robinson, 'The Years Of Rice And Salt.'

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Dauphin
      I saw some of them this weekend.
      Cool, whereabouts?
      Concrete, Abstract, or Squoingy?
      "I don't believe in giving scripting languages because the only additional power they give users is the power to create bugs." - Mike Breitkreutz, Firaxis

      Comment


      • #33
        I say keep it censored. It's more fun that way

        Comment


        • #34
          I still think we should sensor more words... like "liberal", "democrat", and "socialist" for starters... oh, and "commie"
          Monkey!!!

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by Aramis
            Ming's response was courteous and said all that was needed.
            I think it was courteous, but it didn't say everything that was needed.
            In Soviet Russia, Fake borises YOU.

            Comment


            • #36
              How about give users the option to add/subtract words to a censor list, much like we can block users. Certain words that only have obscene uses would of course be automatically censored.
              Visit First Cultural Industries
              There are reasons why I believe mankind should live in cities and let nature reclaim all the villages with the exception of a few we keep on display as horrific reminders of rural life.-Starchild
              Meat eating and the dominance and force projected over animals that is acompanies it is a gateway or parallel to other prejudiced beliefs such as classism, misogyny, and even racism. -General Ludd

              Comment


              • #37
                How about instead of automatically censored, automatically added to the posters censor list on registration? That way people could uncensor them

                Comment


                • #38
                  Sounds good, but it is possible with the forum software?

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by Immortal Wombat

                    Cool, whereabouts?
                    I saw the cormorants on the Thames near Billingsgate, the **** was....elsewhere.
                    One day Canada will rule the world, and then we'll all be sorry.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Well I know a certain site that doesn't censor anything that would be happy to take in some sailor mouthed refugees......


                      *cough* http://www.youthrights.org *cough*
                      Captain of Team Apolyton - ISDG 2012

                      When I was younger I thought curfews were silly, but now as the daughter of a young woman, I appreciate them. - Rah

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by Dauphin
                        I saw the cormorants on the Thames near Billingsgate, the **** was....elsewhere.
                        Ah, yes. I didn't think there'd be shags up on the Thames.
                        Concrete, Abstract, or Squoingy?
                        "I don't believe in giving scripting languages because the only additional power they give users is the power to create bugs." - Mike Breitkreutz, Firaxis

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Originally posted by Japher
                          I still think we should sensor more words... like "liberal", "democrat", and "socialist" for starters... oh, and "commie"
                          Whay about "nazi" and "coward"?
                          Cuando un dedo señala la luna, los tontos miran el dedo. (del Mayo francés)

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Originally posted by Smiley
                            How about give users the option to add/subtract words to a censor list, much like we can block users. Certain words that only have obscene uses would of course be automatically censored.
                            Sounds nice, but I doubt the owners will do it.
                            In Soviet Russia, Fake borises YOU.

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              I voted , it simply doesn't bother me.
                              I watched you fall. I think I pushed.

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Non-issue to me. I mean, while ***-for-tat and latin phrases might get censored every once and a while, we still know what was basically being said without every word that has a double-meaning (one innocent, one not-so-innocent).

                                Plus, there's just the fact that we can still say these things, just in different ways.

                                The ***** **** on the floor.
                                The dog pooped on the floor.

                                ***-for-tat
                                quid pro quo

                                etc.

                                This gets a from me.
                                I'm not conceited, conceit is a fault and I have no faults...

                                Civ and WoW are my crack... just one... more... turn...

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X