2026 RAH Memorial Poly FF League

[Demonbinder]

I am ok with those as well. But I always thought that 3 was too high for INT. It's not always the fault of the QB. Many times it is tipped. I would prefer 2 for that, certainly not 4!

[Berzerker]

2 pd, 1 tl, 3 ff, 2 fr or 3 for both sounds good

do ints count as pds and sacks as tackles for loss?

if ints get 1+ for pd then that's 4 while a ff or fr is 2, so I can see bumping them to 3 or 3 and 2

[-Jrabbit]

2 pd, 1 tl, 3 ff, 2 fr or 3 for both sounds good

do ints count as pds and sacks as tackles for loss?

if ints get 1+ for pd then that's 4 while a ff or fr is 2, so I can see bumping them to 3 or 3 and 2

Your questions about INTs also counting as Passes Defended and Sacks also counting as Tackles for Loss (or, for that matter, TFLs also counting as tackles) are not options the commish gets to choose. But INTs definitely do not count as a Pass Defended. We've seen that for years.

Tackles For Loss should result in, essentially +1 for Solo Tackle and another +1 for being behind the line of scrimmage. Frankly, I'd be shocked if Yahoo also uses it to further pad Sacks. But as I said, it's just a category on a page in the Commissioner's Tools; no full description. If we add it, it is what it is.

Also, a note: Several years back, we increased the values of INTs from 2 to 3, and increased fumble scoring by adding Fumble Recovered to Forced Fumble. IMHO that's been working fine. I see no actual reason to further inflate turnovers.

[EPW]

[-Jrabbit]

Everyone has checked in, so it looks like we've got our 10-team league again, with LannyW joining to replace SlowwHand. Here's the list:

• Vicious Rabbits (Jack, commish)
• Bzzz (Berz)
• Culverhouse Party (ColdWizard)
• Demonballers (Demonbinder)
• Mingapolcos (Ming)
• Abilene Eagles (Craig)
• Nimrods (Mark Guth)
• Omaha Steaks (Flatlander Fox)
• Teh Peeled Bananas REBORN (Eric)
• Lanny's Lumberjacks (LannyW)

Huzzah!