Dumping a rookie in there with the way they played this season will probably be disastrous. The Colts are garbage without Peyton.
You really think the Colts will do Peyton dirty like that by just cutting him, though? I don't know. He's done too much for the Colts for them to be like that. I know it's business but I can't see them not doing right by him.
-
My preference hinges on Manning being healthy enough to play. If he's not, I'm always skeptical of the idea of dumping a rookie QB on the field to adjust to the NFL on the job. I think it can ruin a good QB prospect.Leave a comment:
-
That's an awful lot of money they could use to get some kind of a supporting cast though. Also, how likely is Manning to get hurt again? Will he be able to still throw like he did before? I think that he gets the $$ if he is there in March, so not really all that much time to evaluate his recovery...Originally posted by Mojotronica View PostLeave a comment:
-
So they're definitely drafting Luck? I always imagined before Manning's injury that the Colts would draft a 2nd or 3rd round developmental guy, develop him for 2 years or so while Peyton played and then bring him out. Guess they're going all in for Luck.Leave a comment:
-
Draft Luck, Play Manning and let Luck carry a clipboard and develop his game. Assuming that Manning is able to play again.Leave a comment:
-
The Peyton Manning debate
Draft Luck, Cut Manning, and use the 28 million to get some decent players around Luck?
or
Draft Luck, Play him and let him grow under Manning's teachings?
or
Draft Luck, Play Peyton, and let Luck develop "normally"?
Leave a comment: