Originally posted by Tingkai
You're suggesting that I unfairly labelled him a third string goalie for purely subjective reasons when all I was stating was the fact that he was number three behind Raycroft and Aubin. And he was number 3 because of his performance.
I never said that he would forever be a third-string goalie.
You're suggesting that I unfairly labelled him a third string goalie for purely subjective reasons when all I was stating was the fact that he was number three behind Raycroft and Aubin. And he was number 3 because of his performance.
I never said that he would forever be a third-string goalie.
Comment