Even if someone were to try to argue that you need to be in the country legally (citizen or no) to be afforded constitutional protection it would follow in nearly all cases other than perhaps someone caught right at the border or under continuous observation since illegally crossing the border, that it would be absolutely necessary to establish through legal process that they were not in the country legally before denying them any of those constitutional protections. If you didn't, you'd offer government a loophole to all constitutional rights large enough to steer a fleet of cargo ships through.
If someone is passionate about illegal immigration for whatever reason they'd better focus their political energies on the border and on due process within the borders. No government could be trusted with a loophole so vast.
If someone is passionate about illegal immigration for whatever reason they'd better focus their political energies on the border and on due process within the borders. No government could be trusted with a loophole so vast.
Comment