trump: immigrants eat dogs?

[Dinner]

It is just reality. I am sorry you refuse to acknowledge it. Proof is every where and easy to find if you ever decide to seek it out. It seems many prefer to remain in denial though,

[Ming]

Talk about denial... One person recanted her story, and the other found her cat in the basement.
Vance has admitted that the story isn't true, and all the city official claim there is no evidence.
But I guess you will keep believing the lies being told to you.
That is reality.

[giblets]

Dinner is the new BK

[Dinner]

TDS is a real mental illness. Hopefully, you guys will be able to make it through when Kamala loses.

[Ming]

TDS I guess calling out Trump for his lies means TDS to you
You seem to suffer from DDS

[giblets]

Are you betting any money on Trump winning?

[Geronimo]

Hilarious that you're going with "pet eating has happened" as your response. WTF does any of this have to do with the election? Neither Trump nor Harris has anything to do with this non-issue. It certainly isn't enlightening anyone about actual immigration issues. It's just another distraction to move the conversation away from Trump's Project 2025 agenda and his massive legal troubles.

Trump is constantly denying any association to this Project 2025. How can we be sure he intends to adhere to the project?

[-Jrabbit]

Don't be naïve.

[Lorizael]

It doesn't matter what Trump "intends to adhere" to. Trump doesn't have any principles. But the people he's going to put in his administration are the people who suck up to him the most, and the only people who are still willing to do that are Project 2025 people. They will be the people in power, the people running agencies, the people hiring and firing civil servants, so that's what the Federal government under Trump is going to do.

[WigIaf]

Trump doesn't have any principles.

he doesn't get a choice in that matter
"one's interest" self as a constant
Principle versus the spectrum of aPrinciple

what a principled person socially recognizes as a blue ribbon pumpkin

elite standardism etc

another one who thinks they are better than people who like tacky gold toilets

sad fashionism etc

[Geronimo]

he doesn't get a choice in that matter
"one's interest" self as a constant
Principle versus the spectrum of aPrinciple

what a principled person socially recognizes as a blue ribbon pumpkin

elite standardism etc

another one who thinks they are better than people who like tacky gold toilets

sad fashionism etc

He doesn't have an ideology. Ideology gets a bad rap so detractors don't want to put it that way but it's true. Trump has plenty of "principles" but they are perfectly arbitrary and don't seem to hang on any definable ideology other than "Trump is great". "Trumps detractors are lame."

[N35t0r]

Trump is constantly denying any association to this Project 2025. How can we be sure he intends to adhere to the project?

He has also tried to distance himself from the overturning of Roe vs. Wade after he realized the huge backlash it had on his popularity.

Plus, several of the authors of Project 2025 were in his cabinet during his presidency, and/or are expected to be in his cabinet should he win the presidency. He could more convincingly refute the association if he actually came up with an alternative, but instead he has "concepts of a plan", so...

[Geronimo]

He has also tried to distance himself from the overturning of Roe vs. Wade after he realized the huge backlash it had on his popularity.

Plus, several of the authors of Project 2025 were in his cabinet during his presidency, and/or are expected to be in his cabinet should he win the presidency. He could more convincingly refute the association if he actually came up with an alternative, but instead he has "concepts of a plan", so...

How has he possibly distanced himself from overturning Roe v Wade? He has never favored federal bans on abortion and even if he did that would be quite distinct from Roe v Wade. He claimed Roe v Wade was a bad decision because it wasn't constitutional. I'm sure if he gets a second term Project 2025 will be about as useful for predicting his actions as Mao's little red book would have been to predict Kamala's actions as president (that is to say, not much).

[giblets]

Project 2025 mastermind allegedly told colleagues he killed a dog with a shovel


Revealed: former colleagues claim Kevin Roberts told them he killed a neighbor’s pit bull around 2004

​The man behind Project 2025, the rightwing policy manifesto that includes calls for a sharp increase in immigrant deportations if Donald Trump is elected, told university colleagues about two decades ago that he had killed a neighborhood dog with a shovel because it was barking and disturbing his family, according toformer colleagues who spoke to the Guardian.

Kevin Roberts, now the president of the Heritage Foundation, is alleged to have told colleagues and dinner guests that he killed a neighbor’s pit bull around 2004 while he was working as a still relatively unknown history professor at New Mexico State University.
​

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/sep/24/project-2025-kevin-roberts-killed-dog

They're killing the dogs!!!!

[giblets]

Of course, just because the Heritage Foundation has helped Trump pick Supreme Court nominees in the past doesn't mean they will have any influence on a second Trump administration.

[Ming]

I wonder if he put him in the fridge to eat him later... kind of like Kennedy

[Uncle Sparky]

Which Kennedy did they eat? And what minority did they blame?