I really don't understand why we talk about "gender assigned at birth". Was there anything indelible about the "assignment" and isn't gender just a cultural construct anyway? Shouldn't all physiological sex related differences fall under the umbrella categories of male, female or intersex? If someone is experiencing gender dysphoria from lack of agreement between a gender they personally identify with and some other gender that others want to ascribe to that person why would the mutilations of surgical modifications of their healthy bodies be characterized as "gender affirming treatment"? We don't perform surgery on genders. Genders and sex are totally different. Gender is a role and sex is a spectrum of biological and physiological differences that comprise sexual differentiation in a species. If you want to affirm a gender surgery isn't going to cut it (see what I did there?).
For the most part gender seems totally unnecessary on both an individual and species level. What do we need gender for anyway? If gender dysphoria is traumatic why not just do away with gender as a society before we advocate for surgeries intended to make the patient's body more closely resemble the kind of sexual physiology more typically associated with their chosen gender?
For the most part gender seems totally unnecessary on both an individual and species level. What do we need gender for anyway? If gender dysphoria is traumatic why not just do away with gender as a society before we advocate for surgeries intended to make the patient's body more closely resemble the kind of sexual physiology more typically associated with their chosen gender?
Comment