Tweet
let them cry systemic result
instead of abject failure on all counts
willfully
instead of abject failure on all counts
willfully
-
-
and bull**** "war on drugs"
domestic terrorism
that's the government
terrorizing the peopleComment
-
**** the fallen
**** the police
god hates cops
god hates fedsComment
-
what a joke
a police state that can't secure a rooftop in nowhere pennsylvania-manComment
-
a pathetic national failure
usa the failed stateComment
-
I am not delusional! Now if you'll excuse me, i'm gonna go dance with the purple wombat who's playing show-tunes in my coffee cup!
Rules are like Egg's. They're fun when thrown out the window!
Difference is irrelevant when dosage is higher than recommended!Comment
-
What type of autistic person spams eight pages of garbage?Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.Comment
-
Trump had faced charges stemming from special counsel Jack Smith's investigation into his possession of classified materials at Trump's Mar-a-Lago residence. He pleaded not guilty to all 37 felony counts from Smith’s probe, including willful retention of national defense information, conspiracy to obstruct justice and false statements. 37 bogus charges thrown in the garbage. In NY convicted of all. See the difference between law and a kangaroo court ming???Comment
-
If Smith's appointment was improper than Smith also brought the politically motivated case in D.C..Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.Comment
-
Yep... In New York, the law actually worked. While in the documents case, a biased judge that he appointed threw out the case for reasons that had actually nothing do with the actual charges, and will be appealed. I do indeed see the difference.Originally posted by My Wife Hates CIV View PostKeep on Civin'
RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron OComment
-
-
For those interested in reality the court found that the DOJ needs to actually follow the constitution and that means principal officers have to be nominated by the president and confirmed by the Senate. None of that was done with Jack Smith. Furthermore, the DOJ has been illegally diverting funds earmarked for a special counsel but Congress had repealed the law authorizing special counsels. So the law the DOJ used to justify appointing Jack Smith doesn't even exist because Congress repealed it
A completely unlawful partisan witch hunt from start to finish.
Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.Comment
-
It is amazing that Ming didn't bother to learn even the basics of the ruling, much less the legal facts, yet still wants to falsely claim bias simply because the facts of the case didn't support the partisan outcome he wanted.Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.Comment
-
Most political parties in Canada let all the members of that party vote in leadership races, either through mail-in ballots, or on-line. Delegate conventions often cater to special interest groups, so what do you do if you are a party member in the US, and your party has been taken over by a special interest group?
And wasn't it the US founding fathers that started the 'ballots or bullets' movement?Last edited by Uncle Sparky; July 15, 2024, 16:34.There's nothing wrong with the dream, my friend, the problem lies with the dreamer.Comment
-
Gee... I noticed you didn't even mention the first case he was actually convicted on by a court of law. All legal.Originally posted by Dinner View Post
In the second case, you seem to claim that I want a specific outcome. BS. I never said I did, just your normal partisan hack job.
If he is indeed guilty of crimes with the documents, he should be held accountable just like anybody else.
If not. So be it.
And we will see how everything goes on appeal.
It must be nice to be Trump... All the money in the world to hire the best lawyers, deal with judges he appointed, and get the type of "justice" that most people can't. A true two tier justice system.Keep on Civin'
RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron OComment
Comment