Trump.

[giblets]

Harris hasn't said anything that's as economically illiterate as Trump claiming he can replace the federal income tax with tariffs

[N35t0r]

Apparently, for some people, enacting anti-price-gauging laws on the federal level == price controls.

[Elok]

If the government is saying it will punish you for raising the price above a certain point (which may or may not be well-defined), that would be a price control, yes.

[N35t0r]

Then I guess most of your already live under price controls, so I don't really see the fuss.

[Lorizael]

...

sarcasm, folks. Racism was on display at Madison Square Garden. Racism and nativism and hate.

[N35t0r]

...

sarcasm, folks. Racism was on display at Madison Square Garden. Racism and nativism and hate.

Yeah, but the other side might make it illegal to raise TP prices when a hurricane is announced!

[giblets]

...

sarcasm, folks. Racism was on display at Madison Square Garden. Racism and nativism and hate.

He's been doing that for his entire political career???

[Lorizael]

True, and you should only ever mention a bad thing happening the first time it happens.

[Elok]

Then I guess most of your already live under price controls, so I don't really see the fuss.

Thankfully, those laws are at least sometimes ignored, because they're idiotic. Prices raise for a reason, and forcing them to stay low causes the quickest shoppers to buy what they don't need "just in case" while the remainder go without. Then nobody comes in with more because it's not worth the hassle of moving goods through jacked-up roads for the same sale price you can get selling them in a pristine neighborhood. As someone who's been through the aftermath of a cat 5, I think "price gouging" is the normal and correct response to abrupt scarcity.

Also, it is not clear that Kamala would restrain herself to mere post-disaster scenarios, as she unveiled the plan in the context of nationwide inflation. She is certainly stupid enough to try it, as she also proposed unrealized gains taxes that would make the stock market basically unworkable by taxing borderline-hypothetical money. Not that Trump is not a complete nincompoop on economics as well, but yes, she certainly does seem to be proposing government micromanagement of the food market. She isn't being terribly specific (about that or anything else) but that's her own damn fault, and she's said enough stupid **** that she does not deserve the benefit of the doubt.

[Geronimo]

...

sarcasm, folks. Racism was on display at Madison Square Garden. Racism and nativism and hate.

how much of the rally did you watch? for the record I haven't yet watched any of it. I only subject myself to his diction when I'm fact checking an extraordinary claim by his critics or when I want to feel better about my lousy diction,

[Elok]

I have not watched it because Trump/affiliated greasy people saying ignorant things is not news and I have very important old JRPGs to play. But it should be noted that

1. Trump is still doing very well among minorities by historical GOP standards, so whatever he's saying, at least some people aren't hearing or don't care.
2. People have been calling Trump a racist sexist etc for eight years now and it doesn't seem to have hurt him much, but this does distract from criticism on abortion, where he is actually vulnerable.

[Lorizael]

She isn't being terribly specific (about that or anything else) but that's her own damn fault, and she's said enough stupid **** that she does not deserve the benefit of the doubt.

I mean you can read her 82-page policy book. She will call on Congress to enact a Federal ban on price gouging so that corporations don't "exploit consumers during times of crisis." The document then goes through the details of currently enacted laws in Texas, North Carolina, New York, and Florida, which mostly amount to those states sometimes suing companies after disasters in response to complaints.

Maybe that's all stupid, but there's not really any evidence to suggest she's going to micromanage the food market across the country, and price gouging in general isn't something she's talked a lot about since announcing the proposal in August, and obviously it's very unlikely to become law... but sure let's argue she'll be just as bad on the economy as the guy whose entire economic plan, repeated at every opportunity, is to raise massive tariffs on everything through unchecked executive action as soon as he gets into office and to increase housing supply by using the military to deport all the "illegals."

[Elok]

I was referring to her public statements, not a book I didn't realize existed. Fair enough. I don't think we know who will be in practice worse for the economy, because ... er, did Trump release a policy book? Probably not. God knows what he wants to do, or if he'll succeed in implementing any of it, but it'll probably be stupid. It's basically a complete roll of the dice vs. an endorsement of a whole gamut of awful ideas. Actually, when you put it that way, it might be better if she were less specific. Let a man hope. As is, I'm kind of hoping for whichever one wins to be obstructed to complete immobility.

[Bereta_Eder]

snip snip

[Bereta_Eder]

snip snip