Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Politics Thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Ming
    replied
    I notice you haven't brought up the Trump Mafia... and all the laws they have broken. They are the biggest crime family in politics.

    Leave a comment:


  • Berzerker
    replied
    happy 4th

    The Biden clan violated all sorts of laws Joe wrote to seriously - cruelly - punish people for money laundering and drugs. He's proud of Hunter but your kids go to prison. Meanwhile the politicians and bureaucrats argue about privilege as if justice really is their goal.

    Leave a comment:


  • BeBMan
    replied
    Taliban doing the Taliban thing:

    Women's freedoms have steadily shrunk since the Taliban seized power in 2021.


    ​

    Leave a comment:


  • -Jrabbit
    replied
    This just in. Posted for Berz's pleasure...

    Federal Prosecutor Denies He Was Prevented From Bringing Charges Against Hunter Biden

    David Weiss said he stands by his previous statement that he has "ultimate authority" over the case involving the president's son.

    By Arthur Delaney
    Jul 1, 2023, 09:54 AM EDT

    The federal prosecutor overseeing the case against President Joe Biden’s son on Friday denied that he had been hamstrung by the Justice Department.

    An IRS whistleblower has claimed that Delaware U.S. Attorney David Weiss said he couldn’t bring charges against Hunter Biden outside of Delaware, contrary to statements from U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland.

    Weiss himself previously said in a letter to congressional Republicans that he has “ultimate authority” to bring charges against Hunter Biden in any jurisdiction, and he said Friday that this is still the case.

    “I stand by what I wrote,” Weiss said in a letter to House Judiciary Committee Chair Jim Jordan (R-Ohio). Weiss has not previously responded to the whistleblower allegation.

    House Republicans have threatened to impeach Garland over the whistleblower claim, which they allege is more evidence that the Justice Department is biased against former President Donald Trump and protecting the Biden family.

    But Weiss was appointed by Trump and kept on by Joe Biden so that he could continue his investigation into Hunter Biden, whom he charged last month with tax crimes in Delaware. The younger Biden has agreed to plead guilty to misdemeanors for failing to pay federal taxes and to enter a diversion program to head off a felony charge over illegal gun ownership.

    Before the charges were brought, a supervisory special agent from the IRS criminal division named Gary Shapley claimed Weiss said during an October meeting that he couldn’t charge Biden in Washington, D.C., or California because the U.S. attorneys in those jurisdictions wouldn’t cooperate.

    Republicans made Shapley’s testimony public after Weiss announced the Biden plea deal, which they described as a slap on the wrist.

    Weiss said in his Friday letter that even if prosecutors in other states didn’t want to partner on the case, he had been “assured” that Garland would let him bring charges in Washington, California “or any other district where charges could be brought in this matter.”

    House Republicans this week asked Weiss, as well as other Justice Department and IRS officials, to sit for transcribed interviews about the Hunter Biden case, but Weiss said in his letter that he couldn’t provide details about the investigation. He denied that the Justice Department retaliated against Shapley.

    Separately on Friday, Hunter Biden attorney Abbe Lowell blasted Republicans for making Shapley’s testimony public and suggested that Shapley himself might have been under an internal investigation for misconduct.

    “The timing of the agents’ leaks and your subsequent decision to release their statements do not seem innocent ― they came shortly after there was a public filing indicating the disposition of the five-year investigation of Mr. Biden,” Lowell said in a letter to House Ways and Means Chair Jason Smith (R-Mo.). “To any objective eye your actions were intended to improperly undermine the judicial proceedings that have been scheduled in the case.”

    ​

    Leave a comment:


  • Berzerker
    replied
    well, here ya go... JD has compiled some of the evidence

    ​​​​​​https://youtu.be/-iElSovzJ5U

    Leave a comment:


  • Berzerker
    commented on 's reply
    what WHAT?

  • -Jrabbit
    replied
    Originally posted by Berzerker View Post

    As I recall, when Trump was president Democrats were warning people about his vaccine. They were the vax skeptics before the election, then they lied and mandated it under Biden.
    I call BS on your one-way selective memory.

    Leave a comment:


  • -Jrabbit
    commented on 's reply
    Give Jimy Dore a few minutes and he'll explain to you how we should have known the future results of studies not yet begun.

  • BeBMan
    replied
    Ex-president Jair Bolsonaro is barred from running for office by the top electoral court.


    Might run as Trump's VP guy instead. Not sure if legally allowed, but that was always secondary for T

    Leave a comment:


  • Berzerker
    commented on 's reply
    People did survive covid because of Ivermectin, studies on both the prophylactic and therapeutic use show a benefit. Arguing about how 'significant' that benefit is misses the point.

  • -Jrabbit
    commented on 's reply
    FTFY: Tell that to the person who believes they survived Covid because of Ivermectin.

  • Berzerker
    replied
    yeah I dont think they said that

    Leave a comment:


  • PLATO
    replied
    Originally posted by EPW View Post
    Ivermectin does nothing against COVID. We can't have a rational discussion about the safety of mRNA vaccines because nutjobs like Rogan and Bret Weinstein keep pushing the ****.
    mRNA is just simply amazing technology. I believe it can literally change the world of medicine and save millions of lives....hmmm...maybe I should say millions of MORE lives. Only someone who hasn't taken the time to understand the science and just wants to jump on conspiracy theories would believe otherwise.

    Leave a comment:


  • Berzerker
    replied
    The studies dismissing Ivermectin show it can help and dosing before infection provides even better protection. The gripe is it doesn't help enough with sick people. Tell that to the person who survived covid because of Ivermectin.

    Leave a comment:


  • EPW
    replied
    Ivermectin does nothing against COVID. We can't have a rational discussion about the safety of mRNA vaccines because nutjobs like Rogan and Bret Weinstein keep pushing the ****.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X