The Atlantic is untrustworthy
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Robert F Kennedy for President?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Berzerker View PostI identified an untrustworthy sourceIndifference is Bliss
Comment
-
Originally posted by N35t0r View Post
Which would imply you knew how to distinguish it from a trustworthy source. (Also, pretty rich coming from a guy who rarely gives a source for anything, and when he does it's just a rando YouTube video).
Comment
-
Originally posted by Berzerker View Post
No, it 'implies' I know how to recognize an untrustworthy source. Trustworthy sources are much harder to identify and I just posted several links in response to your request for evidence of vax risk in kids from studies in Thailand and Taiwan. So instead of addressing that evidence you're complaining about the links you wanted.
Incidentally, from the paper you linked:
Conclusion: Cardiac symptoms are common after the second dose of BNT162b2 vaccine, but the incidences of significant arrhythmias and myocarditis are only 0.1%. The serial ECG screening method has high sensitivity and specificity for significant cardiac adverse effect but cost effect needs further discussed.
If you actually want to support your claim that the vaccines in kids are worse than useless, you'd also need to find evidence that unvaccinated kids don't have more complications from COVID than vaccinated kids.Indifference is Bliss
Comment
-
You asked for links in post 36 and I posted 3 links about 2 studies. I didn't say the vax was worse than useless, I said it's a risk that can outweigh the reward. I never said there was no reward, only that the reward is largest for old sick people. The reward shrinks and the risk increases in younger (healthy) people. Parents have to assess risk for their kids and Fauci et al lied to us. We were told kids wouldn't get covid or give it to the grandfolks. That was a lie, the vaccinated were getting covid and spreading it to the unvaccinated who were blamed and demonized.
How do you calculate the complications from the vax? Isn't that something we wont know for years/decades? I think the people bringing us messages from Pfizer will continue lying about the vax. If you want people to vaccinate children you need evidence the risk is worth the reward and you dont even know what the vax does now much less what it will do to them in the future. Pray... I am.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Berzerker View PostYou asked for links in post 36 and I posted 3 links about 2 studies. I didn't say the vax was worse than useless, I said it's a risk that can outweigh the reward. I never said there was no reward, only that the reward is largest for old sick people. The reward shrinks and the risk increases in younger (healthy) people. Parents have to assess risk for their kids and Fauci et al lied to us. We were told kids wouldn't get covid or give it to the grandfolks. That was a lie, the vaccinated were getting covid and spreading it to the unvaccinated who were blamed and demonized.
How do you calculate the complications from the vax? Isn't that something we wont know for years/decades? I think the people bringing us messages from Pfizer will continue lying about the vax. If you want people to vaccinate children you need evidence the risk is worth the reward and you dont even know what the vax does now much less what it will do to them in the future. Pray... I am.
That was really easy.
[Edit:] also, your links only addressed a small part of the claims in the post you refer.Indifference is Bliss
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by N35t0r View Post
How do you calculate complications from COVID? Isn't that something we won't know for years/decades? I think the people bringing us anti-healthcare messages will continue lying about the vax. If you want people not to vaccinate children you need evidence that the risk is not worth the reward and you don't even know what COVID does now Mitch less what it will do to them in future.
That was really easy.
[Edit:] also, your links only addressed a small part of the claims in the post you refer.
Comment
-
This is actually a very good interview. It is a shame he has to go to a U.K. outlet to get coverage simply because the DNC corruptly is in bed with left wing media in the U.S..
Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Some good, some bad, I would like to see him debate Biden. Oh, wait, the DNC is completely corrupt and hates democracy so it cancelled all debates to protect a brain dead fossil who very few people like.
Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dinner View PostSome good, some bad, I would like to see him debate Biden. Oh, wait, the DNC is completely corrupt and hates democracy so it cancelled all debates to protect a brain dead fossil who very few people like."I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration somehow you're not patriotic. We should stand up and say we are Americans and we have a right to debate and disagree with any administration." - Hillary Clinton, 2003
- Likes 2
Comment
-
A sitting president usually only has a primary if he is very weak.
Most Democrats don't consider Biden to be very weak, even if they would prefer someone else. The reason they would prefer someone else is primarily because of his age. I think it is a real weakness against someone like DeSantis (DeSantis might have the problems though... ), but not against Trump probably.
If you were to ask Democrats about a primary to select the VP, I think there would be broad support from Democrats for such a primary.
JMJon Miller-
I AM.CANADIAN
GENERATION 35: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social experiment.
Comment
Comment