Queen Elizabeth II is dead

[Serb]

[N35t0r]

Right, and at the same time Stalin was all buddy-buddy with Hitler splitting up eastern Europe.

[N35t0r]

At least the UK went to war in support of Poland, rather than stabbing them in the back.

[Serb]

Right, and at the same time Stalin was all buddy-buddy with Hitler splitting up eastern Europe.

In 1933?

[Serb]

At least the UK went to war in support of Poland, rather than stabbing them in the back.

Only if by calling a "strage war" and a tail between thier legs known as Dunkerk one year after you call a war.

That was USSR who has liberated Poland from the Nazis, not UK or Martians.

[Serb]

Tell me, why can't you be a little bit less ignoratnt and stupid?
Why, you Westerners, are always have to be so dumb and and so ignorrant about history?

Maybe, because you are so fkn brainless zombies?!

[PLATO]

In 1933?

Actually Molotov-Ribbentrop was signed in 1939.

Tell me, why can't you be a little bit less ignoratnt and stupid?
Why, you Russians, are always have to be so dumb and and so ignorrant about history?

[N35t0r]

In 1933?

Where did Hitler develop his tanks? Soviet-Nazi relations didn't spontaneously appear with Molotov-Ribbentrop

[N35t0r]

Only if by calling a "strage war" and a tail between thier legs known as Dunkerk one year after you call a war.

At that time, you were actively supplying the Nazis with resources and genociding poles and Baltic people, so I'm not sure why you think this is an argument at all...

That was USSR who has liberated Poland from the Nazis, not UK or Martians.

And you liberated it so well, you forgot to give half of it back to Poland!

[Serb]

Actually Molotov-Ribbentrop was signed in 1939.

That was the point, dummy!

[Serb]

Where did Hitler develop his tanks? Soviet-Nazi relations didn't spontaneously appear with Molotov-Ribbentrop

In Germany, obviously!
They have used tanks in the Great War, when Russia has not a single one.

[N35t0r]

In Germany, obviously!
They have used tanks in the Great War, when Russia has not a single one.

They were forbidden from having tanks by the allies after Versailles. (Edit: and didn't get confident enough to openly defy this until much later)

Holy ****ing ****, you're ignorant of the history of your own giving nation:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kama_tank_school

[N35t0r]

So, to recap:

England: king makes nazi salute once
Soviet union: helps the Nazis with their tanks

England: declares war on Germany
Soviet union: stabs Poland in the back and massacres lots of poles


Nazis: surprise attack on the Soviet Union
Soviet Union: surprised Pikachu face, survived only because of US and to a lesser degree British aid.

[PLATO]

That was the point, dummy!

Ahh! I didn't look at the magazine cover posted above. My apologies sir! I stand corrected.

[PLATO]

So, to recap:

England: king makes nazi salute once
Soviet union: helps the Nazis with their tanks

England: declares war on Germany
Soviet union: stabs Poland in the back and massacres lots of poles

Full agreement

Nazis: surprise attack on the Soviet Union
Soviet Union: surprised Pikachu face, survived only because of US and to a lesser degree British aid.

Not sure I fully agree with Russia only survived because of US and Britain. I think most of us in the West were taught this, but I think it sells short the industrial mobilization that the Soviets were able to pull off. For the most part, they equipped themselves and fielded an army of 7 Million men that had what they needed to fight the harshest battles of the entire war and win. Just as an example, Russia produced 84,000 T-34 tanks. It is propaganda in the West that they only survived because of the West. USSR 1945 was a formidable power for its time.