Trump is an incurious, ignorant blowhard. W was a simpleminded chimp. These are the two Republican presidents I have direct knowledge of. Yeah, I was alive for both Reagan and Bush Sr., but I was too young to really have any awareness or knowledge of them. So when I look at my assessment of these presidents and take note of my general political lean (crazy, yes, but left-ish), my spidey sense tingles. That is, it feels like confirmation bias.
So I wish I had a model of a basically competent Republican president I could point to and say, "Look, that guy is not on the same side of the political spectrum as you, but he appears to at least have all his marbles. Trump and W, on the other hand, are nincompoops. There's a difference and you're not hopelessly biased!" And I am aware that there are relatively recent Republican presidents (Bush Sr.? Ford? Eisenhower?) who are generally regarded as sane and with it, but I have no firsthand knowledge of them. So I can't be sure that were I transplanted to their respective eras, I wouldn't have thought they were blithering morons.
So, older folks with more direct awareness of past Republican presidents, were there basically decent ones who make our two most recent Rs seem anomalously awful? Or is it the nature of politics to be hopelessly biased and incapable of seeing the opposition as anything other than screamingly idiotic? (I'll note that I suspect both McCain and Romney would have been reasonably okay presidents (even though I voted for neither of them), but I can't actually know how I would have felt had they won.)
I used "so" a lot in this post. Sigh, I'm tired.
So I wish I had a model of a basically competent Republican president I could point to and say, "Look, that guy is not on the same side of the political spectrum as you, but he appears to at least have all his marbles. Trump and W, on the other hand, are nincompoops. There's a difference and you're not hopelessly biased!" And I am aware that there are relatively recent Republican presidents (Bush Sr.? Ford? Eisenhower?) who are generally regarded as sane and with it, but I have no firsthand knowledge of them. So I can't be sure that were I transplanted to their respective eras, I wouldn't have thought they were blithering morons.
So, older folks with more direct awareness of past Republican presidents, were there basically decent ones who make our two most recent Rs seem anomalously awful? Or is it the nature of politics to be hopelessly biased and incapable of seeing the opposition as anything other than screamingly idiotic? (I'll note that I suspect both McCain and Romney would have been reasonably okay presidents (even though I voted for neither of them), but I can't actually know how I would have felt had they won.)
I used "so" a lot in this post. Sigh, I'm tired.
Comment