Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Witch Hunt Revealed

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 119
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 26 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 46 86 119 template Next
  • #526
    Modern GOP debating style, translated to parenting actions:

    Kid1 gets busted for dealing weed at high school. Immediately upon hearing the news, Mom calls Kid2, who has been away in college for 3 years and is making straight A's, and starts yelling at Kid2 for throwing a ball in the house 6 years prior.

    Comment

    • #527
      The irony in all this is Hillary's campaign was paying an outfit to find dirt on Trump, hence the Steele Dossier. Steele was British intel... From what I understand, Trump didn't have to pay for his dirt on Hillary and didn't even get it from the Russians, wikileaks got it. Both of them were dealing with foreigners trying to influence the election.

      Comment

      • #528
        Free Beacon and several other republicans originally paid for dirt on Trump.
        For there is [another] kind of violence, slower but just as deadly, destructive as the shot or the bomb in the night. This is the violence of institutions -- indifference, inaction, and decay. This is the violence that afflicts the poor, that poisons relations between men because their skin has different colors. - Bobby Kennedy (Mindless Menance of Violence)

        Comment

        • #529
          Originally posted by JohnT View Post
          Yo, Kid, you may wish to send Hillary an invoice for all that space she's taking up in your head. Maybe start charging her rent?
          I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
          - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

          Comment

          • #530
            But Hillary...

            This is all I hear on this site from the forum clown. He is claiming to ignore me. If there really was case the republican led House would be after her... Or at least the republican led Department of Justice.

            Trumps own DOJ is investigating him.
            For there is [another] kind of violence, slower but just as deadly, destructive as the shot or the bomb in the night. This is the violence of institutions -- indifference, inaction, and decay. This is the violence that afflicts the poor, that poisons relations between men because their skin has different colors. - Bobby Kennedy (Mindless Menance of Violence)

            Comment

            • #531
              los on January 27, 2017. Second, the FBI reportedly interviewed Mifsud in early-to-mid February, 2017 in Washington DC, when Mifsud spoke at the Global Ties conference. Third, the FBI interviewed Papadopoulos again on February 16, 2017. The April 2017 application should have included details from these interviews, especially details from its interview of Mifsud, who, after all, supposedly provided the information that launched Crossfire Hurricane.

              But the page-plus summary of Papadopoulos’ role in the Trump campaign and his supposed nexus to “coordinated efforts to influence the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election” remained unchanged. (Compare pages 93-94 with pages 191-192 of the released FISA applications available here.) The only apparent change in that section came in the concluding paragraph, detailing Page’s “established relationships with Russian Government officials,” with a slight addition to the footnote. (See page 192 of the FISA Application file.)

              Of particular note, the footnote included a new Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request exemption notation, b7D-1, which allows the government to withhold information that “could reasonably be expected to disclose the identity of a confidential source.”

              These facts indicate that the DOJ did not inform the FISA court of the FBI interviews with Papadopoulos and Mifsud. But it should have, especially if Mifsud denied Papadopoulos’ claim that the Maltese professor had bragged that the Russians had dirt on Hillary. Or was Mifsud an FBI informant or an asset of a foreign government, and was that instead what the DOJ told the FISA court?

              It’s time for the FBI to come clean: Who was Mifsud, and what was his role in the launch of Crossfire Hurricane? And did the State Department assist the FBI in handling Mifsud? Congress and the president supposedly hold power over these agencies. They, and we, need the answers.
              FISA Applications Reveal More Mysteries About Joseph Mifsud
              http://thefederalist.com/2018/08/02/inspect-fisa-applications-closely-mysteries-arise-joseph-mifsud/
              What began as a deep-dive into the Trump Tower meeting unearthed yet further proof of the DOJ and FBI’s abuse of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.
              I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
              - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

              Comment

              • #532
                The federalist lmao... You couldn't have picked a worse source. A bunch of nonissues. Remember Hillary isn't subject to criminal investigation, nor is the FBI. Trump and many his colleagues are.
                For there is [another] kind of violence, slower but just as deadly, destructive as the shot or the bomb in the night. This is the violence of institutions -- indifference, inaction, and decay. This is the violence that afflicts the poor, that poisons relations between men because their skin has different colors. - Bobby Kennedy (Mindless Menance of Violence)

                Comment

                • #533
                  "Second, the FBI reportedly interviewed Mifsud in early-to-mid February, 2017 in Washington DC, when Mifsud spoke at the Global Ties conference. Third, the FBI interviewed Papadopoulos again on February 16, 2017. The April 2017 application should have included details from these interviews, especially details from its interview of Mifsud, who, after all, supposedly provided the information that launched Crossfire Hurricane."

                  "Reportedly". "supposedly". "Should have".

                  We post opinion pieces, complete with self-referential citations, as fact now? Damn, this place has changed!

                  Comment

                  • #534
                    Papadopolous is in prison. Hillary is free. But Hillary...

                    I wouldn't wipe my ass with the federalist. Its on the same level as infowars.
                    For there is [another] kind of violence, slower but just as deadly, destructive as the shot or the bomb in the night. This is the violence of institutions -- indifference, inaction, and decay. This is the violence that afflicts the poor, that poisons relations between men because their skin has different colors. - Bobby Kennedy (Mindless Menance of Violence)

                    Comment

                    • #535
                      It would also hurt. Monitor edges can be sharp, and phones are expensive.

                      Comment

                      • #536
                        Originally posted by JohnT View Post
                        We post opinion pieces, complete with self-referential citations, as fact now? Damn, this place has changed!
                        well, to be fair its mostly kidicious.

                        BUT WHAT ABOUT HILLARY'S EMAILS? BEMGHAZI PIZZA DELIVERY SERVICE!
                        I wasn't born with enough middle fingers.
                        [Brandon Roderick? You mean Brock's Toadie?][Hanged from Yggdrasil]

                        Comment

                        • #537
                          Lol, Dotard the first, very Stable Genius and expert negotiator, just implemented the Iranian sanctions which he lifted when he scuttled the nuclear deal.

                          Comment

                          • #538
                            JohnT gets triggered by populist opinions now too.
                            I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
                            - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

                            Comment

                            • #539
                              Naw, but citing an opinion as a fact doesn't do your argument well at all.

                              Here is a proper citation. Example used for illustrative purposes only.

                              x.com
                              https://twitter.com/DonaldJTrumpJr/status/884789418455953413?s=19


                              And another:

                              x.com
                              https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1026084333315153924?s=19

                              Comment

                              • #540
                                Originally posted by JohnT View Post
                                Naw, but citing an opinion as a fact doesn't do your argument well at all.

                                Here is a proper citation. Example used for illustrative purposes only.

                                https://twitter.com/DonaldJTrumpJr/s...455953413?s=19

                                And another:

                                https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/...315153924?s=19
                                "Reportedly" indicates fact. FACT!
                                I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
                                - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

                                Comment

                                • -Jrabbit
                                  #540.1
                                  -Jrabbit commented
                                  August 6, 2018, 15:58
                                  Editing a comment
                                  Um, no. In fact, the word "reportedly" is used to indicate that the referenced statement is NOT a proven fact. All it means is that someone reported it. It says nothing about whether the report is true or not.
                                  Here, have some actual dictionary definitions:

                                  Oxford English Dictionary:
                                  Reportedly (adverb) -- according to what some say (used to express the speaker's belief that the information given is not necessarily true).

                                  American Heritage Dictionary:
                                  Reportedly (adverb) -- by report; supposedly

                                  Collins English Dictionary:
                                  Reportedly (adverb) according to rumor or report
                              Previous 1 26 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 46 86 119 template Next
                              Working...
                              X