Thread for obviously newsworthy stuff

[Proteus_MST]

The only person that has anything to worry about is Creepy Porn Lawyer and his associate.

Of course ... that Arvenatti has more to fear than Kavanaugh is as sure as it was, that Cohen would never flip on Trump

[Giancarlo]

TOS violations mean nothing but she is right wing. That's your argument, that she is right wing, not a valid argument. I didn't say she was objective. I said she is somewhat objective, and I demonstrated that she can be objective. You said she gushes over Trump. Let's see it. I don't believe it.

She was a big moron just like you. Psychotic too. And she was never objective. She would cite herself as a source. That is a sign of delusions.

[Giancarlo]

And the unsupported idiocy continues...

[Kidlicious]

He wasn't "deservedly banned" you fool. One of the reasons they gave was "showed a video of a minor being pushed to the ground."

[Kidlicious]

Your denial is obviously false. Furthermore you don't have a real argument. It wouldn't even matter if she gushed over Trump. She is a body language expert. The only thing that matters is her analysis.

[Kidlicious]

This is not good for Creepy Porn Lawyer!

• Julie Swetnick, the third woman to accuse Brett Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct in high school, faced allegations from her former employer that she engaged in “unwelcome, sexually offensive conduct” in 2000.
• WebTrends alleged in a lawsuit that, after the company determined she had engaged in “inappropriate conduct,” Swetnick made “false and retaliatory allegations” of sexual harassment against two male co-workers.
• Kavanaugh vehemently denied Swetnick’s claims, and her lawyer, Michael Avenatti, called the case “bogus,” pointing out that WebTrends dismissed its case.

[Proteus_MST]

Well, the right wing even cried "persecution" and "censorship" when this right wing conspiracy theorist Alex Jones was (deservedly) banned from Youtube, Twitter & Co

IMHO it is funny:
When Twitter & Co announced that they would now would be more strict with banning fake accounts and accounts that violate the TOS, Trump (and many of his fans) were happy and expected a massive banning of mainstream media accounts as well as left wing accounts.
When this backfired, as there are more rightwing accounts who are fake accounts or violate the TOS, and it was rather lots of rightwing bot accounts and (TOS violating) right wing conspiracy theorists which were banned, they suddenly scream "persecution".


It reminds me of the constant chants about locking up Hillary Clinton.

One of those people who cried loudest to "lock her up", Michael Flynn, is himself getting locked up soon

[Aeson]

TOS violations mean nothing but she is right wing. That's your argument, that she is right wing, not a valid argument.

It’s not an argument, it was a statement of fact. I’d have rather she kept her channel ... watching her gush over Trumps promises he obviously wasn’t going to keep would be even more entertaining in retrospect!

There’s still plenty of right wing channels on YouTube, and plenty of left wing ones that have been kicked off. Your claim that being right wing is all a TOS violation means is obviously false.

[Aeson]

That even you hedge on her objectivity speaks volumes

If she still has the old videos I can’t find them. Too bad, they were hilarious!

[Kidlicious]

Yes they are.

[Kidlicious]

[Kidlicious]

She’s not objective... I watched her old channel for laughs the way I read your posts. In her videos every liberal is automatically lying, and every conservative is telling the truth. The funniest was how she would gush about Trump’s honesty

The old channel was Bombards Body Language. Seems she got 3 TOS violations and had that account shut down. I don’t know what the policy violations were.

TOS violations mean nothing but she is right wing. That's your argument, that she is right wing, not a valid argument. I didn't say she was objective. I said she is somewhat objective, and I demonstrated that she can be objective. You said she gushes over Trump. Let's see it. I don't believe it.

[Aeson]

She’s not objective... I watched her old channel for laughs the way I read your posts. In her videos every liberal is automatically lying, and every conservative is telling the truth. The funniest was how she would gush about Trump’s honesty

The old channel was Bombards Body Language. Seems she got 3 TOS violations and had that account shut down. I don’t know what the policy violations were.

[Kidlicious]

I’ve watched her channel before ... it was called something else back then ... she took down all the old videos. A lot of them gushing over Trump for being so honest throughout the campaign.

Of the videos she’s left up I’ve only seen part of one... the NK summit... I made it all the way to where she started talking about Trump being wiser

I bet this is untrue. Here's an analysis of Kav's exgirlfriends. It seems somewhat objective.

https://www.*****ute.com/video/caKA00cE9Vpx/

[Kidlicious]

Some good news from a Donnie tweet (rare enough)

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/...30634103025664



He writes that in contrast to the NBC reporting, he didn't constrain the FBIs scope with regards to investigating Kavanaugh, but instead gives them full freedom to interview whomever they wish.
Guess that means that the FBI also is allowed to investigate the allegations of Julia Swetnick (Arvenattis Client). Something that, according to some WH official in the NBC article, they were forbidden from doing.

The only person that has anything to worry about is Creepy Porn Lawyer and his associate.