Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

How much damage are activist judges doing to the democratic party and the courts themselves?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by kentonio View Post

    Feel free to explain how filling his cabinet with super rich corporate executives with financial ties to Russia counts as 'draining the swamp'.
    Not the EU. If you don't know what the Swamp is do research.
    I have to march because my mother couldn't get an abortion. - Maxine Waters
    you're demonstrating your misogyny by calling p*ssy caps Vagina hats.-rah
    If they're hiding it [mental illness] from their doctor because they want to buy a gun, I have no problem with it. - rah

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Kidicious View Post
      Not the EU. If you don't know what the Swamp is do research.
      Well so far the 'swamp' seems to include scientists, experts, diplomats, any and all Democrats and anyone who doesn't think poor people should die of easily treatable illnesses or starvation. Am I missing anyone out?

      Comment


      • #33
        Anti-Americans.
        I have to march because my mother couldn't get an abortion. - Maxine Waters
        you're demonstrating your misogyny by calling p*ssy caps Vagina hats.-rah
        If they're hiding it [mental illness] from their doctor because they want to buy a gun, I have no problem with it. - rah

        Comment


        • #34
          Ah yes. The hated Anti-Nationals.
          Me fail english? That's unpossible!

          Comment


          • #35
            I'm just reading comments made in public by an activist FBI director. Unbelievable!!!
            Blah

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by kentonio View Post

              Feel free to explain how filling his cabinet with super rich corporate executives with financial ties to Russia counts as 'draining the swamp'.
              the WH is the drain

              Comment


              • #37
                Draining the swamp and keeping the mud, and the crap that was floating on top. He needs a good base for when he re-fills the swamp.
                Me fail english? That's unpossible!

                Comment


                • #38
                  He meant to say drain the fountain, so he could scoop out all the change at the bottom.
                  Kidiot, Justifying acting like an asshat by calling it trolling is just additional douchery. Simple as that.
                  RIP Tony Bogey & Baron O

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by Kidicious View Post

                    Why do you think the liberals are doing this Berz. It can't be on principles. They don't have any. I can't figure out their game plan. Are they just all butt hurt little children?
                    obstructionism is the general rule except when both parties make a profit, but the problem is the nature of this war - its 'perpetual' and the courts are reluctant to expand the power of the prez as if we were fighting for our very existence. I want the courts to be a check, they went awol in the drug war and let the politicians ignore the constitutional limits on their power. I'm sure FDR didn't have to deal much with obstructionist courts when managing wwii, they even let him imprison americans of japanese descent.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by Berzerker View Post

                      obstructionism is the general rule except when both parties make a profit, but the problem is the nature of this war - its 'perpetual' and the courts are reluctant to expand the power of the prez as if we were fighting for our very existence. I want the courts to be a check, they went awol in the drug war and let the politicians ignore the constitutional limits on their power. I'm sure FDR didn't have to deal much with obstructionist courts when managing wwii, they even let him imprison americans of japanese descent.
                      If Trump is going to win in the end how does this help them? Judges aren't supposed to make laws. Everyone knows that. This is lawlessness. So how does it pay off?
                      I have to march because my mother couldn't get an abortion. - Maxine Waters
                      you're demonstrating your misogyny by calling p*ssy caps Vagina hats.-rah
                      If they're hiding it [mental illness] from their doctor because they want to buy a gun, I have no problem with it. - rah

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        What law did the judge make? This is the process required by our laws, had the judge ruled in Trump's favor the plaintiff would appeal up the chain. I just happen to think the SCOTUS will continue expanding executive power as is the practice during 'wars'. Judges are stuck in the position of deciding what is or isn't needed to wage these wars, both foreign and domestic. Actually, your drug war is a big reason why we have judges in that position. The whole effing reason for the 4th Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and seizures was the impolite practice of no-knock raids and seized property by the King's troops, but we do it now because its a "war against drugs".

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Originally posted by Berzerker View Post
                          What law did the judge make? This is the process required by our laws, had the judge ruled in Trump's favor the plaintiff would appeal up the chain. I just happen to think the SCOTUS will continue expanding executive power as is the practice during 'wars'. Judges are stuck in the position of deciding what is or isn't needed to wage these wars, both foreign and domestic. Actually, your drug war is a big reason why we have judges in that position. The whole effing reason for the 4th Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and seizures was the impolite practice of no-knock raids and seized property by the King's troops, but we do it now because its a "war against drugs".
                          If you are comparing the war on drugs to the war on terrorism I fail to see the connection unless you mean to say that citizens should have the right to request for anyone to immigrate to the country. That's basically the law that this judge created, and it certainly wasn't the law before. As you mentioned, the president has the right to restrict immigration of anyone who HE judges to be a threat to the country. It is NOT the decision of judges.
                          ​​​
                          I have to march because my mother couldn't get an abortion. - Maxine Waters
                          you're demonstrating your misogyny by calling p*ssy caps Vagina hats.-rah
                          If they're hiding it [mental illness] from their doctor because they want to buy a gun, I have no problem with it. - rah

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Do you believe that the President should obey the Constitution?
                            <p style="font-size:1024px">HTML is disabled in signatures :( :( :(</p>

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Originally posted by Kidicious View Post

                              If you are comparing the war on drugs to the war on terrorism I fail to see the connection unless you mean to say that citizens should have the right to request for anyone to immigrate to the country. That's basically the law that this judge created, and it certainly wasn't the law before. As you mentioned, the president has the right to restrict immigration of anyone who HE judges to be a threat to the country. It is NOT the decision of judges.
                              Both wars are open doors to politicians to exceed the constitution - thats why we have the prolific practice of no-knock raids, seized (stolen) property and widespread spying, and your party is even more guilty than the Dems... But the judge didn't pretend to write immigration law - the judge is undoubtedly trying to apply the laws written by Congress that the prez' executive order conflicts with... This war on terror is ill-defined, there are no borders, no one to declare war on, yet we're at war. Judges are left deciding how far the prez should be allowed to go.

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Originally posted by loinburger View Post
                                Do you believe that the President should obey the Constitution?
                                Everyone should
                                I have to march because my mother couldn't get an abortion. - Maxine Waters
                                you're demonstrating your misogyny by calling p*ssy caps Vagina hats.-rah
                                If they're hiding it [mental illness] from their doctor because they want to buy a gun, I have no problem with it. - rah

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X