Tweet
Originally posted by giblets
View Post
-
Straw man fallacyI drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett Kavanaugh -
-
Looks like History is one of the worst college majors:
Hmmm I guess they're right about something.Comment
-
Originally posted by giblets View PostIt takes only one counterexample to disprove the theory of an Old Earth. Most of the "evidence" for an Old Earth is based on claims that lack testability, such as radiometric dating, and hence would not even satisfy minimum requirements for admissibility in a court of law. If each of the following 45 counterexamples to an Old Earth has merely a 10% chance of being valid, then the probability that the Earth is billions of years old is only 1%. In other words, the Earth must be young with a likelihood of 99%
though that kind of reasoning might well explain some of kid's arguments..."The Christian way has not been tried and found wanting, it has been found to be hard and left untried" - GK Chesterton.
"The most obvious predicition about the future is that it will be mostly like the past" - Alain de BottonComment
-
Biblical scientific foreknowledge is how the Bible shows a comprehension of science far ahead of its time. The Bible is a superb roadmap to future scientific discoveries. Unfortunately Bible deniers, including many atheists and evolutionists, refuse to read the Bible, and their irrational closed-mindedness against the Bible obstructs the advancement of science.
Comment
-
History of dinosaurs
Creation science asserts that the biblical account, that dinosaurs were created on day six of creation[5] approximately 6,000 years ago, along with other land animals, and therefore co-existed with humans, thus debunking the Theory of Evolution and the beliefs of evolutionary scientists about the age and creation of the earth.
Creation science posits that dinosaurs lived in harmony with other animals, (probably including in the Garden of Eden) eating only plants[6]; that pairs of each dinosaur kind were taken onto Noah's Ark during the Great Flood and were preserved from drowning[7]; that many of the fossilized dinosaur bones originated during the mass killing of the Flood[8]; and that possibly some descendants of those dinosaurs taken aboard the Ark are still around today.[9] At least 300 distinct genera of dinosaur have been identified.[10]
Archaeological, fossil, and documentary evidence supports the logical conclusion that dinosaurs co-existed with mankind until at least relatively recent times.
Because the term only came into use in the 19th century, the Bible does not use the word "dinosaur." However, there are numerous references throughout the biblical account. For example, the behemoth in Job and the leviathan in Isaiah are clearly references to dinosaurs,[11] [12] although others have claimed that Behemoth and Leviathan are references to a hippopotamus or elephant and a crocodile respectively. However, the Biblical descriptions do not fit those creatures, note that hippopotamuses and elephants do not have a "tail like a cedar". Furthermore, even if the terms did refer to other animals, this does not necessarily invalidate the existence of dinosaurs. The Creation account was not intended as a comprehensive list of all animals God created - it does not for instance state explicitly that He created the ferret. However, Genesis does state that God created all animals, which would include any not mentioned by name.
"The Christian way has not been tried and found wanting, it has been found to be hard and left untried" - GK Chesterton.
"The most obvious predicition about the future is that it will be mostly like the past" - Alain de BottonComment
-
I don't know why anyone would read that. It has nothing to do with what we were talking about. Why are you such an ass?I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett KavanaughComment
-
well, quite. but you are the one quoting conservopedia...Originally posted by Kidicious View Post"The Christian way has not been tried and found wanting, it has been found to be hard and left untried" - GK Chesterton.
"The most obvious predicition about the future is that it will be mostly like the past" - Alain de BottonComment
-
Because the issue is what conservatives call gay propaganda you ******.Originally posted by C0ckney View PostI drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett KavanaughComment
-
oh, that's easy:
you're welcome.what bigots usually mean when they refer to gay propaganda is:
a) teaching that homosexuals exist;
b) teaching that contrary to what some iron age goat herders thought, homosexuality is normal and that homosexuals shouldn't be bullied/discriminated against;
c) including the mechanics of gay sex in sex education lessons
"The Christian way has not been tried and found wanting, it has been found to be hard and left untried" - GK Chesterton.
"The most obvious predicition about the future is that it will be mostly like the past" - Alain de BottonComment
-
More propaganda. Lies.I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett KavanaughComment
-
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA... It's the other way around. They are trying to avoid being denied equal rights because the christians are trying to get everybody to conform to their morals.Originally posted by Kidicious View Post
They use information to combat christian propaganda that is being used against them.And they will use propaganda to become successful.
Yep, politics for the christians as well.Right now parents and local communities still have some control over what their children are taught. So yeah, it's politics. It's a fight, and each side is fighting to win.
National level vs local level... like that makes any difference to the child.The difference is that there's no national movement to teach every child to accept religious principles. It's done on the local level, and it's not the same thing.
Yep... using your definition, it's also propaganda.I'm not saying that religious education is inherently different.
Do you even read what you type????? Conformists (yet another attempt to label your opposition with a term with negative baggage) are trying to keep Christians from spreading their form of hate.It's the same thing, so long as there is politics involved. But on this side, Christians are trying to keep the conformists from convincing our children that what their parents are teaching them at home is hatred against others.
Informing children about "gay education" does not harm anybody. I would argue that teaching them that gays will burn in hell does more harm.I was responding to what I believe was an implication that gay education doesn't harm children. Are you saying that I was wrong to respond that way?Keep on Civin'
RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron OComment
-
That's factually incorrect. They are trying to make everyone approve of what they do. That's why you see all the shaming. That's why they accuse Christians of hate. The feminists are doing the same thing. The gays are following their lead. It's not about equal rights. It's about getting everyone to agree that there's nothing wrong with being gay. Sure it goes both ways, but it's not the same thing.Originally posted by Ming View PostI drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett KavanaughComment
-
oh, the horror.Originally posted by Kidicious View Post
"The Christian way has not been tried and found wanting, it has been found to be hard and left untried" - GK Chesterton.
"The most obvious predicition about the future is that it will be mostly like the past" - Alain de BottonComment
-
It's actually very horrible to be called homophobic when you aren't. It's a horrible thing to do. Calling good people homophobic just so that everyone will approve of everything you do, or believe everything you believe is sick.Last edited by Kidlicious; December 29, 2015, 08:27.I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett KavanaughComment
Comment