And somehow this made money for UK citizens?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Australia gives Knighthood to Prince Philip - er, ... A Prince Philip appreciation thread
Collapse
X
-
“It is no use trying to 'see through' first principles. If you see through everything, then everything is transparent. But a wholly transparent world is an invisible world. To 'see through' all things is the same as not to see.”
― C.S. Lewis, The Abolition of Man
-
did i claim it did?"The Christian way has not been tried and found wanting, it has been found to be hard and left untried" - GK Chesterton.
"The most obvious predicition about the future is that it will be mostly like the past" - Alain de Botton
Comment
-
No. But Kentonio was about to.“It is no use trying to 'see through' first principles. If you see through everything, then everything is transparent. But a wholly transparent world is an invisible world. To 'see through' all things is the same as not to see.”
― C.S. Lewis, The Abolition of Man
Comment
-
that would be a very strange reading of what i wrote."The Christian way has not been tried and found wanting, it has been found to be hard and left untried" - GK Chesterton.
"The most obvious predicition about the future is that it will be mostly like the past" - Alain de Botton
Comment
-
Originally posted by kentonio View PostYes ok, the monarchy has no value and the vast crowds of people who visit the UK each year to watch the changing of the guard and gawp at the palaces hoping to catch a glimpse of the royals are actually just a figment of our imaginations, just like the mass media appeal of stories/pictures/scandal involving them.
Why is it so difficult to just hold an ideological position without having to try and rewritd reality to support it? Ok, you dont like the monarchy, good for you, but trying to imply it doesnt have huge mass market appeal is just dishonest.
That's a pretty blatant strawman. Nobody has claimed that the Royal Family create no revenue, have they? Simply that the notion that the revenue exceeds the costs and loss of revenue through massive inefficiency is open to robust challenge.
After all, what revenue is actually generated by watching the changing of the guard and gawping at the palaces? None. It's free.The genesis of the "evil Finn" concept- Evil, evil Finland
Comment
-
Would you like me to highlight any more howling inaccuracies in that site on the value of the monarchy, by the way? There's loads.The genesis of the "evil Finn" concept- Evil, evil Finland
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bugs ****ing Bunny View PostWould you like me to highlight any more howling inaccuracies in that site on the value of the monarchy, by the way? There's loads.
Comment
-
Originally posted by kentonio View PostThat's exactly what I'd like you to do, which is why I immediately posted that link without mentioning any reservations about how pointless it would be due to inherent biases.
Would you like to comment on the inclusion of the Crown Estates as assets on the monarchy?
Would you like to dispute the failure of Royal links to save two of the businesses closest to the Royal Family- Ardent and Duchy Originals?
Would you like to discuss the fact that they detail the long-term costs of extra public holidays from 2012 to infinity as less than the short-term cost in 2012 alone?
If this is just down to my bias, you'll be able to counter these points with a smile and a merry wink. So hop to it.The genesis of the "evil Finn" concept- Evil, evil Finland
Comment
-
I can't even begin to describe how much this bores me. The monarchy are a brand which has huge appeal internationally, which sells papers by the millions and attracts interest from citizens of countries around the world, with an inevitable result in tourism. Most of it is fairytale fantasism, but thats by the by. The brand makes money, as successful brand always do. There's a perfectly reasonably argument to be had about how the inherently anti-democractic nature of a monarchical system overrides any financial benefit that it may provide, but this endless attempt by the Republican side to claim that monarchy doesn't provide value is just tedious in the extreme. You may as well be arguing that celebrity gossip doesn't have any financial value, because basically it's the same argument. People love celebrity, and there are very few forms of celebrity that stand higher than the British monarchy in terms of brand appeal.
Comment
-
We manage to find plenty of people to gossip about without the government helping us out
Europe is so socialist the government even appoints people to be the target of gossip. We freedom-loving individualists in the United States managed to find a free-market solution in the form of hollywood at tmz.com.
Kentonio, you should just come out and straight up admit that you're kinda fond of the cutesy aspect of having ~a monarchy~ and that it swells your national pride, kinda like the space shuttle or mars rover or B-2 do here. Except wait a minute. Those actually do things.If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
){ :|:& };:
Comment
Comment