Originally posted by Colon™
View Post
the problem with greece at start of the crisis was that it had a debt (caused by lax public finances) that it couldn't pay. the plan to 'save' it was not to write off the debt, but to give greece loans and impose conditions that would inevitably shrink the economy; on its face the plan appeared to be absolute madness: a country that couldn't pay its debts being offered more debt as a solution.
it's important to understand the motivations of those involved. default for greece would have meant leaving the euro, possibly the EU; in other words humiliation for any mainstream national politician (and we must not forget just how attached to the EU mainstream politicians in the EU are) who took that course. on the EU side everyone was worried that a greek default and exit would provoke contagion: the other PIIGS leaving the euro and a banking collapse; perhaps you recall the various reports from banks predicting famine, war, and pestilence if greece defaulted, which could be summarised thus: banks say banking collapse would be bad.
if we look at the 'rescues' as if they were intended to resolve greece's problems, then they appear completely unworkable and an abject failure; they appear absurd in fact (and this was pointed out at the time). however, if we look at them as if they were intended to save the euro and shore up the banking system, then they make sense, and have in fact worked. the euro is still standing and banking system, while still somewhat shaky, is in much better shape than it was in 2008/9. the greek people though have paid the price. they were given a plan which couldn't possibly have worked and were blamed for its failure.
Comment