I think the analysis has at least three overlapping flaws or biases.
1. Wooly statements are rewarded. Who doesn't want a growing and vibrant economy ( except the Greens?). No-one wants more taxes and less benefits for themselves as set out in the detailed policies.
2. Only the stated policies are rewarded. If you don't mention an unpopular idea that you want to pursue, no problem, no one will know.
3. Parochial policies are being compared to broad ones. A policy that is not important to most will be more accepted than a policy that does affect most - maybe just me but I was selecting policies by process of elimination, rather than - "ooh I like that idea".
1. Wooly statements are rewarded. Who doesn't want a growing and vibrant economy ( except the Greens?). No-one wants more taxes and less benefits for themselves as set out in the detailed policies.
2. Only the stated policies are rewarded. If you don't mention an unpopular idea that you want to pursue, no problem, no one will know.
3. Parochial policies are being compared to broad ones. A policy that is not important to most will be more accepted than a policy that does affect most - maybe just me but I was selecting policies by process of elimination, rather than - "ooh I like that idea".
Comment