Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
					
						
						
							
							
							
							
								
								
								
								
									View Post
								
							
						
					
				
				
			
		Announcement
				
					Collapse
				
			
		
	
		
			
				No announcement yet.
				
			
				
	
UK: Obese woman blames government
				
					Collapse
				
			
		
	X
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
 Johnson certainly isn't anti-business.DISCLAIMER: the author of the above written texts does not warrant or assume any legal liability or responsibility for any offence and insult; disrespect, arrogance and related forms of demeaning behaviour; discrimination based on race, gender, age, income class, body mass, living area, political voting-record, football fan-ship and musical preference; insensitivity towards material, emotional or spiritual distress; and attempted emotional or financial black-mailing, skirt-chasing or death-threats perceived by the reader of the said written texts.
 
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
 the guardian can hardly be described as very left-wing. it's a slightly left-of-centre liberal (big and small l) establishment paper.Originally posted by kentonio View PostPlease feel free to explain what a couple of random quotes from news sites is supposed to actually mean btw. You do understand for instance that The Guardian is a very left wing paper, and their 'analysis' of the Tory party is usually going to be on the level of 'Well after they rose from the 9th circle of hell..'."The Christian way has not been tried and found wanting, it has been found to be hard and left untried" - GK Chesterton.
 
 "The most obvious predicition about the future is that it will be mostly like the past" - Alain de Botton
 Comment
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
 It's not particularly left wing if you're a left winger. If you're on the right, it's a daily version of Mao's Little Red Book.Originally posted by C0ckney View Postthe guardian can hardly be described as very left-wing. it's a slightly left-of-centre liberal (big and small l) establishment paper.  
 Comment
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
 of course one's own perspective comes into it, but i'm really curious as to why you think the guardian is left wing?"The Christian way has not been tried and found wanting, it has been found to be hard and left untried" - GK Chesterton.
 
 "The most obvious predicition about the future is that it will be mostly like the past" - Alain de Botton
 Comment
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
 I laugh at both sides to be honest, but from a centrist standpoint the Guardian is quite left wing. Not as left wing as the Telegraph and Paper-that-Shall-Not-be-Named are right wing, but definitely left wing. Sometime I find it a really interesting read, but sometimes it just frustrates the hell out of me with it's naivety.Originally posted by C0ckney View Postof course one's own perspective comes into it, but i'm really curious as to why you think the guardian is left wing?
 Comment
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
 well it does have a few writers who can be described as left-wing, but it's editorial line is pretty centrist (what kind of left-wing newspaper would have a leader entitled "in praise of ian duncan smith"?!), its principal writers straddle both sides of the centre ground, and electorally it supports the liberal democrats.
 
 i suppose the focus on identity politics leads to people to think it's a left-wing paper, but to me that says more about its urban (perhaps metropolitan would be better here), liberal, middle class outlook.Last edited by C0ckney; October 23, 2014, 08:47."The Christian way has not been tried and found wanting, it has been found to be hard and left untried" - GK Chesterton.
 
 "The most obvious predicition about the future is that it will be mostly like the past" - Alain de Botton
 Comment
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
 Johnson is above all weird. People who hold business responsible for social injustices usually also believe welfare ought to rectify those injustices through redistribution. Anti-business sentiments go hand in hand with pro-welfare sentiments.Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui View PostHe's definitely pro-welfare state though.DISCLAIMER: the author of the above written texts does not warrant or assume any legal liability or responsibility for any offence and insult; disrespect, arrogance and related forms of demeaning behaviour; discrimination based on race, gender, age, income class, body mass, living area, political voting-record, football fan-ship and musical preference; insensitivity towards material, emotional or spiritual distress; and attempted emotional or financial black-mailing, skirt-chasing or death-threats perceived by the reader of the said written texts.
 Comment
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
 The Guardian is very slanted in reports that concern business and finance.DISCLAIMER: the author of the above written texts does not warrant or assume any legal liability or responsibility for any offence and insult; disrespect, arrogance and related forms of demeaning behaviour; discrimination based on race, gender, age, income class, body mass, living area, political voting-record, football fan-ship and musical preference; insensitivity towards material, emotional or spiritual distress; and attempted emotional or financial black-mailing, skirt-chasing or death-threats perceived by the reader of the said written texts.
 Comment
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
 I don't think anyone is holding bussinesses responsible for social inustices. That's like holding chimpazees responsible for not having invented the cure for cancer.Originally posted by Colon™ View PostJohnson is above all weird. People who hold business responsible for social injustices usually also believe welfare ought to rectify those injustices through redistribution. Anti-business sentiments go hand in hand with pro-welfare sentiments.
 Comment
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
 Fix your debts first!DISCLAIMER: the author of the above written texts does not warrant or assume any legal liability or responsibility for any offence and insult; disrespect, arrogance and related forms of demeaning behaviour; discrimination based on race, gender, age, income class, body mass, living area, political voting-record, football fan-ship and musical preference; insensitivity towards material, emotional or spiritual distress; and attempted emotional or financial black-mailing, skirt-chasing or death-threats perceived by the reader of the said written texts.
 Comment
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
 I have sympathy for this for the working poor since making cheap healthy food is pretty time consuming and fast food is pretty good at hitting both fast and cheap. But if you don't have a ****ing job you have plenty of time to boil bean and ****.Stop Quoting Ben
 Comment
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
 Marxists are.Originally posted by Bereta_Eder View PostI don't think anyone is holding bussinesses responsible for social inustices. That's like holding chimpazees responsible for not having invented the cure for cancer.I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
 - Justice Brett Kavanaugh
 Comment

Comment