It's deeply ironic that c0ckney is the one who sounds like a college freshman halfway through Das Kapital here.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Chilean activist destroys student debt papers worth $500m
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Lorizael View PostI don't agree with c0ckney, but his argument here would be that our environment (in the broad sense in which he was using it) affects human nature in such a way as to make stable anarchy impossible. In one sense, he's right. If we were inundated by easily accessible abundance, then economics as we know it wouldn't need to exist and people could probably get along just fine.
Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View PostThat's kind of my point, Elok.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Elok View PostYeah, I was just taking issue with "anarchy was the initial state." It was never a state--there was only very limited/local government, of tribes or families.If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
){ :|:& };:
Comment
-
Originally posted by regexcellent View PostIt's deeply ironic that c0ckney is the one who sounds like a college freshman halfway through Das Kapital here.“As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
"Capitalism ho!"
Comment
-
But those tribes had an established social structure before they were even properly human--it just shifted over time. Our common ancestor with the chimps was bound to have some small group of dominant apes calling the shots. And so on back through more primitive primates. If nothing else, the eldest member of a family would enjoy prominence. You can only say such groups are "not governed" by arbitrarily saying that it's only government once it reaches a certain size or sophistication.
XPost
Comment
-
Yeah, I know, it's just that the SoN is perhaps the central error of the Enlightenment--the basic assumption holding up the whole notion that human beings are primarily individuals, rather than members of groups. Almost everything we believe about rights, and all that rot, is based on this one misbegotten fantasy from three hundred years ago.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Elok View PostNah, there's still power and status to fight over. Most of us are (by world standards) quite well-off, but we still come on here to trade e-punches.Click here if you're having trouble sleeping.
"We confess our little faults to persuade people that we have no large ones." - François de La Rochefoucauld
Comment
-
You're on Apolyton, reg.Click here if you're having trouble sleeping.
"We confess our little faults to persuade people that we have no large ones." - François de La Rochefoucauld
Comment
Comment